* Re: [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage [not found] ` <HE1PR0701MB2572F65064C5ED08388C8E0B813A0@HE1PR0701MB2572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> @ 2017-11-28 10:34 ` Gabriel Ganne 2017-11-28 11:31 ` Marco Varlese 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Gabriel Ganne @ 2017-11-28 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marco Varlese, Dave Wallace, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio, users; +Cc: vpp-dev Adding dpdk-user ML. I had a look with an older dpdk archive I found. The folder archived has been renamed from *dpdk-17.08* to *dpdk-stable-17.08* This is the only difference, but it is enough to make the md5sum fail. -- Gabriel Ganne ________________________________ From: Gabriel Ganne Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:13:23 AM To: Marco Varlese; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage Hi Marco, I believe http://fast.dpdk.org/rel redirects to http://static.dpdk.org/rel/ I disagree on the md5 hashs. I have the following (NOK on 17.08, and OK on 17.11) : $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.08.tar.xz # is 0641f59ea8ea98afefa7cfa2699f6241 in dpdk/Makefile MD5(dpdk-17.08.tar.xz)= 537ff038915fefd0f210905fafcadb4b $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.11.tar.xz $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.11.tar.xz MD5(dpdk-17.11.tar.xz)= 53ee9e054a8797c9e67ffa0eb5d0c701 Though I agree that if the "recheck" button made the build pass, there must be something wrong on my side. ... what did I miss ? -- Gabriel Ganne ________________________________ From: Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:55:49 AM To: Gabriel Ganne; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage Hi Gabriel, On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:19 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote: Hi, I also have this issue on my machine, and I see on http://static.dpdk.org/rel/<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=YXtwE6d2zZdJXheJMCdO_SuDEoEQrdHCdgK6mO-4uDZ2Bj4ObdPrE5Fn6cirFxtZy34K57yMEhszksJbrY2fvTBetWB77s_CJWkpQyyah6_rFbLQmG-dY-qWniIVsFMMRdRMvyqh0lqUak-Q_B9fQ1OiLTvnngJ7HyAk1jgaPeLkV0WU1HDSfBiGhal1ybeY3rdJxuTArJeYn2n4LUfPpkcz-j2_0PTyMVbDfGIpu8o> that dpdk-17.08.tar.xz was written yesterday (27-Nov-2017 13:00) Wouldn't it be possible that the archive was overwritten ? The DPDK tarball in VPP is downloaded from http://fast.dpdk.org/rel<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=sI-Qn1OsaRXnxl6lIQOxUZGRD-xaVnPckQwB6CApx-aEpU2UjOwTOfDJA0lq7_Gt1VGQkE6h9MX8Bk9XrgJVo3hCjx0joHpm7zsqXSWsSRqfNFPpowBhGN6XywZqIk3LQZuUWd8ZzZ4GB3xv9bDSmK_j0r1RjBHuNRKrWVhBBEd_Ex_JIhXR3UfOngNNGAe6XmP6AtdokoxpJhyUHUq1pw> According to http://dpdk.org/rel<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=sI-Qn1OsaRXnxl6lIQOxUZGRD-xaVnPckQwB6CApx-aEpU2UjOwTOfDJA0lq7_Gt1VGQkE6h9MX8Bk9XrgJVo3hCjx0joHpm7zsqXSWsSRqfNFPpowBhGN6XywZqIk3LQZuUWd8ZzZ4GB3xv9bDSmK_j0r1RjBHuNRKrWVhBBEd_Ex_JIhXR3UfOngNNGAe6XmP6AtdokoxpJhyUHUq1pw> the MD5 used in VPP for the DPDK 17.08 release is correct. In which case, the hash would need to be updated. Right, if the tarball was a newer and different one then the MD5 hash should be updated in VPP for the the checksum performed... However, in the case described by Dave below, a simple 'recheck' which triggers a new build (with the same code/scripts/etc. hence the same MD5 hash) solved it. Also, this would probably not be seen by people who had the dpdk-install-dev package already installed. Who should I ask to check this ? I've added Sergio who might have further thoughts on this one. Best regards -- Gabriel Ganne From: vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io> on behalf of Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 9:19:37 AM To: Dave Wallace Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage Dear Dave, By the look of it is seemed to have been an hiccup with the download or that something spurious was left on the filesystem... === 12:08:13 Bad Checksum! Please remove /w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- opensuse/dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz and retry 12:08:13 Makefile:267: recipe for target '/w/workspace/vpp-verify- master-opensuse/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok' failed 12:08:13 make[3]: *** [/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/build- root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok] Error 1 12:08:13 make[3]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- opensuse/dpdk' 12:08:13 Makefile:460: recipe for target 'ebuild-build' failed 12:08:13 make[2]: *** [ebuild-build] Error 2 12:08:13 make[2]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- opensuse/dpdk' 12:08:13 Makefile:682: recipe for target 'dpdk-build' failed 12:08:13 make[1]: *** [dpdk-build] Error 2 12:08:13 make[1]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- opensuse/build-root' 12:08:13 Makefile:333: recipe for target 'build-release' failed 12:08:13 make: *** [build-release] Error 2 12:08:13 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure === Since the MD5 checksum on the DPDK tarball fails; to answer your question, no, it has never happened to me to see this specific issue before. I don't think there's anything specific to the openSUSE setup and/or scripts being executed. I'd rather feel is - as I said earlier - something to do with an hiccup on the infrastructure side. The fact that a 'recheck' made it passing I suppose it confirms my current theory. An idea: maybe, if it happens again, we might want to ask Vanessa to see what's the status on the slave-node? Not sure if that could give us some more insight of what's going on. Cheers, Marco On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 11:04 -0500, Dave Wallace wrote: > Marco, > > Can you please take a look at the build failure encountered with http > s://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9582/ on the vpp-verify-master-opensuse > jenkins job: > > ----- %< ----- > fd.io JJB 7:56 AM > Patch Set 2: Verified-1 > Build Failed > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/459/<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=bSD_r9PFEyUeYK2sLQKAy2WL9BnY5kTrXCUuKUrPP9OQ7IBGKhjB5ocTORNFqDvxZSYlHbjt3iggbnpFxgM_Oybv6bXiZXxrK-lf_rZF8zGbD-WZXDzMK7PjFKj9mU8TJRgrL-Lh_HI4zy27A_UbQA7FiZ3rhkPs3CGLz57kaquUwiEfwfsIgfEbUbE2JNkyu1uT6zWxMqm05snDrIbcZI5pGcgFos0nhmVycif1cP3S5tp-prl2UPqAPqEn6oBBQGLcTn4UP-4dL7fSiTjm1g> : FAILURE > No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred, > please add a suitable Cause for it. ( https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-v<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=HPvq91kiezi7o40LB46GoU_VrbxtDBkQXU5NOJN_42q7wmrEnrwscRiZwyjmDXZOEmLd8JMBdpFe-7JiVzZkw4P2Ihs_YR6Sk9t1pjqzLuIudy-9VE0hgoBXW6H29wrv7L_K5Aqoyg78Nd5HU7OZO_asCpJAANWfs8j1RlQt4ZgVhZQ2MbpFnIS0JhjKATBUVrd-UJqu3fJ4NV72nr9EXIBKBo3TEwddeXt60-f6fY4> > erify-master-opensuse/459/ ) > Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=RTpZiGUHQDsP_NHKLHjL0vSodFxLttA5Axm0FF4Ba7Z_7XdX4q7ysiiijQ4SbYGfN4l8JkEWeWAQqcc6Embmgh6M0RYuRYKS56AaKXqb6hjUUMQMY55wxIWegV-oFHm4t1n9qPio_oM_07npfY6TAWw2UrFyU00Farp2o3CAJjNk4Lm-J4piiZkdu7FFCApKttRX190YxUS0tjKTz4c5TqKeV8umjOaEWX4jl9cshT_50M9ejJt2tEYt5eAglzbujgAy5y_LWjAa7ZqsJ-tOmQ> > master-opensuse/459 > ----- %< ------ > > From the logs, it appears that there is an issue related to building > dpdk. Have you seen this issue before? If so, it this an > infrastructure issue or something else? > > Thanks, > -daw- > _______________________________________________ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=x-0-WzGI6FM6bK_0y0wK-wa_kz5kTgJK0gAroY5hLIlDHyVofzSdxoUykmXKBcnKoIPJ8AerStHA272WfvwPTEfWez9UcPBjc6kB8arPadIKKH6TYBe8HjzfX8Hy08QqX01wl9RPNsq5OEaPRD7mDUak3_J5vjy5oimChKo1j47p83Tcn1zZ5KXEcIDfanVjw0WrJHG7vBBSGaoVvQKPK70sQ2NhCdAwIaMRCPzaJq_P-I3imaTGYdXc7R0xTP8s> _______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=x-0-WzGI6FM6bK_0y0wK-wa_kz5kTgJK0gAroY5hLIlDHyVofzSdxoUykmXKBcnKoIPJ8AerStHA272WfvwPTEfWez9UcPBjc6kB8arPadIKKH6TYBe8HjzfX8Hy08QqX01wl9RPNsq5OEaPRD7mDUak3_J5vjy5oimChKo1j47p83Tcn1zZ5KXEcIDfanVjw0WrJHG7vBBSGaoVvQKPK70sQ2NhCdAwIaMRCPzaJq_P-I3imaTGYdXc7R0xTP8s> -- Marco V SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage 2017-11-28 10:34 ` [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage Gabriel Ganne @ 2017-11-28 11:31 ` Marco Varlese 2017-11-29 11:20 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Marco Varlese @ 2017-11-28 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gabriel Ganne, Dave Wallace, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio, users; +Cc: vpp-dev Hi Gabriel, I just submitted a patch (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9597/) to VPP to fix thisissue. I've added you to the review so you can take a look. In order to verify that the new patch fixes the issue, people should first run: $ rpm -e vpp-dpdk-devel && rm dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz to trigger a rebuild and reinstall of the dpdk package... Cheers, Marco On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:34 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote: > Adding dpdk-user ML. > > I had a look with an older dpdk archive I found. > The folder archived has been renamed from *dpdk-17.08* to *dpdk-stable-17.08* > This is the only difference, but it is enough to make the md5sum fail. > > -- > Gabriel Ganne > From: Gabriel Ganne > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:13:23 AM > To: Marco Varlese; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage > > Hi Marco, > > I believe http://fast.dpdk.org/rel redirects to http://static.dpdk.org/rel/ > > I disagree on the md5 hashs. > I have the following (NOK on 17.08, and OK on 17.11) : > > $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz > $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.08.tar.xz # is 0641f59ea8ea98afefa7cfa2699f6241 in > dpdk/Makefile > MD5(dpdk-17.08.tar.xz)= 537ff038915fefd0f210905fafcadb4b > > $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.11.tar.xz > $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.11.tar.xz > MD5(dpdk-17.11.tar.xz)= 53ee9e054a8797c9e67ffa0eb5d0c701 > > Though I agree that if the "recheck" button made the build pass, there must be > something wrong on my side. > ... what did I miss ? > > -- > Gabriel Ganne > From: Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:55:49 AM > To: Gabriel Ganne; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage > > Hi Gabriel, > > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:19 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I also have this issue on my machine, and I see on http://static.dpdk.org/re > > l/ that dpdk-17.08.tar.xz was written yesterday (27-Nov-2017 13:00) > > Wouldn't it be possible that the archive was overwritten ? > > The DPDK tarball in VPP is downloaded from http://fast.dpdk.org/rel > According to http://dpdk.org/rel the MD5 used in VPP for the DPDK 17.08 > release is correct. > > In which case, the hash would need to be updated. > > Right, if the tarball was a newer and different one then the MD5 hash should > be updated in VPP for the the checksum performed... > However, in the case described by Dave below, a simple 'recheck' which > triggers a new build (with the same code/scripts/etc. hence the same MD5 hash) > solved it. > > > Also, this would probably not be seen by people who had the dpdk-install-dev > > package already installed. > > > > Who should I ask to check this ? > > I've added Sergio who might have further thoughts on this one. > > > Best regards > > > > -- > > Gabriel Ganne > > From: vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io> on behalf of > > Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 9:19:37 AM > > To: Dave Wallace > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage > > > > Dear Dave, > > > > By the look of it is seemed to have been an hiccup with the download or > > that something spurious was left on the filesystem... > > === > > 12:08:13 Bad Checksum! Please remove /w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > opensuse/dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz and retry > > 12:08:13 Makefile:267: recipe for target '/w/workspace/vpp-verify- > > master-opensuse/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok' failed > > 12:08:13 make[3]: *** [/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/build- > > root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok] Error 1 > > 12:08:13 make[3]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > opensuse/dpdk' > > 12:08:13 Makefile:460: recipe for target 'ebuild-build' failed > > 12:08:13 make[2]: *** [ebuild-build] Error 2 > > 12:08:13 make[2]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > opensuse/dpdk' > > 12:08:13 Makefile:682: recipe for target 'dpdk-build' failed > > 12:08:13 make[1]: *** [dpdk-build] Error 2 > > 12:08:13 make[1]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > opensuse/build-root' > > 12:08:13 Makefile:333: recipe for target 'build-release' failed > > 12:08:13 make: *** [build-release] Error 2 > > 12:08:13 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > > === > > > > Since the MD5 checksum on the DPDK tarball fails; to answer your > > question, no, it has never happened to me to see this specific issue > > before. > > > > I don't think there's anything specific to the openSUSE setup and/or > > scripts being executed. I'd rather feel is - as I said earlier - > > something to do with an hiccup on the infrastructure side. The fact > > that a 'recheck' made it passing I suppose it confirms my current > > theory. > > > > An idea: maybe, if it happens again, we might want to ask Vanessa to > > see what's the status on the slave-node? Not sure if that could give us > > some more insight of what's going on. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Marco > > > > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 11:04 -0500, Dave Wallace wrote: > > > Marco, > > > > > > Can you please take a look at the build failure encountered with http > > > s://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9582/ on the vpp-verify-master-opensuse > > > jenkins job: > > > > > > ----- %< ----- > > > fd.io JJB 7:56 AM > > > Patch Set 2: Verified-1 > > > Build Failed > > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/459/ : FAILURE > > > No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred, > > > please add a suitable Cause for it. ( https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-v > > > erify-master-opensuse/459/ ) > > > Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify- > > > master-opensuse/459 > > > ----- %< ------ > > > > > > From the logs, it appears that there is an issue related to building > > > dpdk. Have you seen this issue before? If so, it this an > > > infrastructure issue or something else? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -daw- > > > _______________________________________________ > > > vpp-dev mailing list > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > vpp-dev mailing list > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > -- > Marco V > > SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg -- Marco V SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage 2017-11-28 11:31 ` Marco Varlese @ 2017-11-29 11:20 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2017-11-29 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marco Varlese, Gabriel Ganne Cc: users, Dave Wallace, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio, vpp-dev, yliu Hi, It is an error on DPDK side. It seems the tarball for DPDK 17.08 has been overwritten by the stable release process. I have restored the original tarball and we are checking what went wrong. fast.dpdk.org is a CDN for static.dpdk.org. It may take time to get the restored tarball on all CDN nodes. Sorry for the noise 28/11/2017 12:31, Marco Varlese: > Hi Gabriel, > > I just submitted a patch (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9597/) to VPP to fix thisissue. > I've added you to the review so you can take a look. > > In order to verify that the new patch fixes the issue, people should first run: > > $ rpm -e vpp-dpdk-devel && rm dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz > > to trigger a rebuild and reinstall of the dpdk package... > > > Cheers, > Marco > > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:34 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote: > > Adding dpdk-user ML. > > > > I had a look with an older dpdk archive I found. > > The folder archived has been renamed from *dpdk-17.08* to *dpdk-stable-17.08* > > This is the only difference, but it is enough to make the md5sum fail. > > > > -- > > Gabriel Ganne > > From: Gabriel Ganne > > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:13:23 AM > > To: Marco Varlese; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage > > > > Hi Marco, > > > > I believe http://fast.dpdk.org/rel redirects to http://static.dpdk.org/rel/ > > > > I disagree on the md5 hashs. > > I have the following (NOK on 17.08, and OK on 17.11) : > > > > $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz > > $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.08.tar.xz # is 0641f59ea8ea98afefa7cfa2699f6241 in > > dpdk/Makefile > > MD5(dpdk-17.08.tar.xz)= 537ff038915fefd0f210905fafcadb4b > > > > $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.11.tar.xz > > $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.11.tar.xz > > MD5(dpdk-17.11.tar.xz)= 53ee9e054a8797c9e67ffa0eb5d0c701 > > > > Though I agree that if the "recheck" button made the build pass, there must be > > something wrong on my side. > > ... what did I miss ? > > > > -- > > Gabriel Ganne > > From: Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:55:49 AM > > To: Gabriel Ganne; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage > > > > Hi Gabriel, > > > > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:19 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I also have this issue on my machine, and I see on http://static.dpdk.org/re > > > l/ that dpdk-17.08.tar.xz was written yesterday (27-Nov-2017 13:00) > > > Wouldn't it be possible that the archive was overwritten ? > > > > The DPDK tarball in VPP is downloaded from http://fast.dpdk.org/rel > > According to http://dpdk.org/rel the MD5 used in VPP for the DPDK 17.08 > > release is correct. > > > In which case, the hash would need to be updated. > > > > Right, if the tarball was a newer and different one then the MD5 hash should > > be updated in VPP for the the checksum performed... > > However, in the case described by Dave below, a simple 'recheck' which > > triggers a new build (with the same code/scripts/etc. hence the same MD5 hash) > > solved it. > > > > > Also, this would probably not be seen by people who had the dpdk-install-dev > > > package already installed. > > > > > > Who should I ask to check this ? > > > > I've added Sergio who might have further thoughts on this one. > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > -- > > > Gabriel Ganne > > > From: vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io> on behalf of > > > Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 9:19:37 AM > > > To: Dave Wallace > > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage > > > > > > Dear Dave, > > > > > > By the look of it is seemed to have been an hiccup with the download or > > > that something spurious was left on the filesystem... > > > === > > > 12:08:13 Bad Checksum! Please remove /w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > > opensuse/dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz and retry > > > 12:08:13 Makefile:267: recipe for target '/w/workspace/vpp-verify- > > > master-opensuse/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok' failed > > > 12:08:13 make[3]: *** [/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/build- > > > root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok] Error 1 > > > 12:08:13 make[3]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > > opensuse/dpdk' > > > 12:08:13 Makefile:460: recipe for target 'ebuild-build' failed > > > 12:08:13 make[2]: *** [ebuild-build] Error 2 > > > 12:08:13 make[2]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > > opensuse/dpdk' > > > 12:08:13 Makefile:682: recipe for target 'dpdk-build' failed > > > 12:08:13 make[1]: *** [dpdk-build] Error 2 > > > 12:08:13 make[1]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > > opensuse/build-root' > > > 12:08:13 Makefile:333: recipe for target 'build-release' failed > > > 12:08:13 make: *** [build-release] Error 2 > > > 12:08:13 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > > > === > > > > > > Since the MD5 checksum on the DPDK tarball fails; to answer your > > > question, no, it has never happened to me to see this specific issue > > > before. > > > > > > I don't think there's anything specific to the openSUSE setup and/or > > > scripts being executed. I'd rather feel is - as I said earlier - > > > something to do with an hiccup on the infrastructure side. The fact > > > that a 'recheck' made it passing I suppose it confirms my current > > > theory. > > > > > > An idea: maybe, if it happens again, we might want to ask Vanessa to > > > see what's the status on the slave-node? Not sure if that could give us > > > some more insight of what's going on. > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Marco > > > > > > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 11:04 -0500, Dave Wallace wrote: > > > > Marco, > > > > > > > > Can you please take a look at the build failure encountered with http > > > > s://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9582/ on the vpp-verify-master-opensuse > > > > jenkins job: > > > > > > > > ----- %< ----- > > > > fd.io JJB 7:56 AM > > > > Patch Set 2: Verified-1 > > > > Build Failed > > > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/459/ : FAILURE > > > > No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred, > > > > please add a suitable Cause for it. ( https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-v > > > > erify-master-opensuse/459/ ) > > > > Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify- > > > > master-opensuse/459 > > > > ----- %< ------ > > > > > > > > From the logs, it appears that there is an issue related to building > > > > dpdk. Have you seen this issue before? If so, it this an > > > > infrastructure issue or something else? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -daw- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > vpp-dev mailing list > > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > > > vpp-dev mailing list > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > > > Marco V > > > > SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton > > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-29 11:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <a7d857a8-1475-bf4c-b1e1-afef931ccc43@gmail.com> [not found] ` <1511857177.2474.13.camel@suse.de> [not found] ` <HE1PR0701MB257242CC3FB3662C8C106236813A0@HE1PR0701MB2572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> [not found] ` <1511862949.2292.5.camel@suse.de> [not found] ` <HE1PR0701MB2572F65064C5ED08388C8E0B813A0@HE1PR0701MB2572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> 2017-11-28 10:34 ` [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage Gabriel Ganne 2017-11-28 11:31 ` Marco Varlese 2017-11-29 11:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).