From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from SNT004-OMC2S41.hotmail.com (snt004-omc2s41.hotmail.com [65.54.61.92]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA35D11D4 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 21:15:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from IND01-BO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.90.73]) by SNT004-OMC2S41.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:15:39 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=SO8adA8UnoutLfmNb3FkRwSqBUw1i7xGcV4HklYAq4Q=; b=DIiSsrvgCTeFuvOPa/mjIJGgnMNpiSquG90WoP6YjxoaT48kS5suvECLGh2FhmOvMpN4uiVUW2yO2PjJVxewueabhod0iSmh7E0YzhZaGf23u1K/BufXZKMDCNsm3InhhmCMwSFznryhU85z0u7zI7HVH+WviTKGirzQWzat2gW6przb7853z7jN7NI4DxywszwQDnYjvlx5qjb76CL/E7wU8ZadRLoya6ZvW7lcGVX4HQa7eQGmWeg953myxEC0c+dQPUj05E1fQSM9vU2niqMMWOWbYkpHiBfwD6bJgamqwytcw/0EySHh13ttfPz1Aczma927lNxQUgN8hVDSTw== Received: from BO1IND01FT003.eop-IND01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.202.52) by BO1IND01HT010.eop-IND01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.202.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.587.6; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:15:36 +0000 Received: from MAXPR01MB0315.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.202.54) by BO1IND01FT003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.202.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.587.6 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:15:35 +0000 Received: from MAXPR01MB0315.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.150.135]) by MAXPR01MB0315.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.150.135]) with mapi id 15.01.0587.013; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:15:33 +0000 From: Sarthak Ray To: "users@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-users] rte_eal_init fails with --socket-mem set to more than 192MB per socket Thread-Index: AQHSA7sl8b/+rXx5hESEAPuv9lK7+g== Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:15:33 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 10.152.202.54) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; dpdk.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dpdk.org; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=outlook.com; received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning outlook.com discourages use of 10.152.202.54 as permitted sender) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [Z7fLs2Ib3DOvWYZyxOUXyfur85wTjidW] x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:10.152.202.54; IPV:NLI; CTRY:; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BO1IND01HT010; H:MAXPR01MB0315.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BO1IND01HT010; 6:lIRXmUgOrYVl9byb+yx45gW95Bnif7X7hJJd/CxdR37YLqOZSM1xsk4kzLGX0ILQ2XUpvfK386v+mxulXPldxkmhQtNVgtoMPPWajJJ1kR1eXzoQ7lnPuXL3HLh7WjVbzdt5TVfWqm+uihFrgB9Rav1ViXfIMLgdjGy3cF1D9Mti8ND7tZPW/s56Yd+BixikmVkp4oX/9/nM2KgKw7dwVle1QVd5KragzBEtLEJjoxWMSGYzMnCuaGKgzA3bWf/Wmhu12OAPwWGYu5DHhC2MfastncgAUQwaMf8ycYAczNs+3E1XZ5qLPnaEpMr5793h; 5:WoLrFJpw9OSLyjlX6nIzZ6PIGr74k5/g4cqZWanJ5HJuux6QtInkxfERKSIefa8PGtfcrNaZo0rG8lcmt2K8sgizzncfCb/zg9h4+gIKvA7/FAr8Jm3NrR96s7zDPOP2/1A3NqnDX4ppoSaYivB6ZQ==; 24:yNH4Jjui/qGu5dPSDJpe1m5yg1yqESSk6nZNR3EcO2ndavyLG9E62vGaH8fRWT7GA7v6GYYHsScmc6fSYST8UNUgPloqpWEjfOE9Qb61D/o=; 7:TpUL8NfelnRSpfhfCtKmMJyBgXDogTHuTQavjGKUhEaroxibgHf728bW0QFZuYgn7Z6uYTSHm8bbAN9Rzh4BUOaubWoDWmuFrUSF826tU9ql15tuMGaPbtDrIVE9URbC8q8Kuta+PBS/lvJWbl6G55Kv6e+aRerJeozxR28WdBY20cSrBVfQgULofa1ciCb3JpzUCVbTuB3BDo8GMUhKHOwRXiu4y/l6k756Yxu1m1YEIE8gdvbyFDJv+SRcN+ME x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6f07139f-0893-4fc9-bd9b-08d3d1d32e65 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(1601124038)(1603103078)(1601125047); SRVR:BO1IND01HT010; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:BO1IND01HT010; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BO1IND01HT010; x-forefront-prvs: 00514A2FE6 spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Aug 2016 19:15:33.4084 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BO1IND01HT010 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2016 19:15:39.0366 (UTC) FILETIME=[0F5D1860:01D203BC] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] rte_eal_init fails with --socket-mem set to more than 192MB per socket X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:15:40 -0000 Hi, I am using dpdk-2.1.0 and I am not able to reserve memory beyond 192MB per = socket by using --socket-mem option. I see below error logs, though my syst= em has enough free memory. EAL: Not enough memory available on socket 0! Requested: 256MB, available: = 192MB PANIC in rte_eal_init(): # numactl -H available: 2 nodes (0-1) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 36 37 38 39 40 41 = 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 node 0 size: 65170 MB node 0 free: 47433 MB node 1 cpus: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 54 55 56= 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 node 1 size: 65536 MB node 1 free: 49999 MB node distances: node 0 1 0: 10 21 1: 21 10 Is there any max limit for reserving memory per socket? If yes, then please= suggest me how to increase that limit. Thanks in advance, Sarthak