From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
To: "Dariusz Sosnowski" <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>,
"Slava Ovsiienko" <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
韩康康 <961373042@qq.com>, "Ori Kam" <orika@nvidia.com>
Cc: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: net/mlx5: mellanox cx5 experiences "rx_phy_discard_packets" under low bandwidth conditions.
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 07:02:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH7PR12MB69059E026DBEEA69D29A04D6D0812@PH7PR12MB6905.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CH3PR12MB846064573D4E42AFEFE70777A4812@CH3PR12MB8460.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Thanks a lot. I didn't notice that the emails were incorrect in the original email.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 3:01 PM
> To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; 韩康康 <961373042@qq.com>; Ori Kam
> <orika@nvidia.com>
> Cc: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: net/mlx5: mellanox cx5 experiences "rx_phy_discard_packets"
> under low bandwidth conditions.
>
> Adding correct mail addresses for users mailing list and to Ori Kam.
>
> > From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 9:00 AM
> > To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; 韩康康 <961373042@qq.com>;
> > Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>; orika <orika@nivida.com>
> > Cc: users <users@dpdk.com>
> > Subject: RE: net/mlx5: mellanox cx5 experiences "rx_phy_discard_packets"
> under low bandwidth conditions.
> >
> > Hi Kangkang,
> >
> > Please take the DPDK performance report and the configurations under DOC
> link of dpdk.org for a reference.
> > It shows how to configure the HW and how to run the testpmd / l2fwd for
> SCP / ZPL testing. Or searching for the DPDK testing white paper from CTC
> as well(中国电信DPDK测试白皮书).
> > In the docs, the NUMA / PCIe / lcore affinity / queue depths will all be
> explained inside.
> >
> > From: Slava Ovsiienko <mailto:viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 1:57 PM
> > To: 韩康康 <mailto:961373042@qq.com>; Dariusz Sosnowski
> > <mailto:dsosnowski@nvidia.com>; Bing Zhao <mailto:bingz@nvidia.com>;
> > orika <mailto:orika@nivida.com>
> > Cc: users <mailto:users@dpdk.com>
> > Subject: RE: net/mlx5: mellanox cx5 experiences "rx_phy_discard_packets"
> under low bandwidth conditions.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > First of all, please, increase the number of queues and handling cores.
> For 100GBps link from 4 to 8 queue/cores usually are needed.
> > Also, you can try combinations of multiple queues per core (2..4 queues
> handled by one core).
> > And there are the offload options “inline” and mprq might be useful to
> gain the wire speed for the small packets.
> > Please see the Nvidia/Mellanox performance reports
> (https://core.dpdk.org/perf-reports/) for the details.
> >
> > With best regards,
> > Slava
> >
> > From: 韩康康 <mailto:961373042@qq.com>
> > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 1:36 PM
> > To: Dariusz Sosnowski <mailto:dsosnowski@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> > <mailto:viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Bing Zhao <mailto:bingz@nvidia.com>;
> > orika <mailto:orika@nivida.com>
> > Cc: users <mailto:users@dpdk.com>
> > Subject: net/mlx5: mellanox cx5 experiences "rx_phy_discard_packets"
> under low bandwidth conditions.
> >
> >
> > You don't often get email from mailto:961373042@qq.com.
> > https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I am using dpdk-testpmd and pkt generator to test bandwith according to
> RFC2544.
> > However, I observed that CX5 rx_phy_discard_packets at low bandwith,
> resulting in abnormal measurements under zero packet loss conditions.
> >
> > dpdk version: dpdk-21.11.5
> > ethtool -i enp161s0f1np1:
> > driver: mlx5_core
> > version: 5.8-6.0.4
> > firmware-version: 16.32.1010
> > Hardware: AMD EPYC 7742 64-core Processor
> > dpdk-testpmd:
> > dpdk-testpmd -l 96-111 -n 4 -a 0000:a1:00.1 -- -i --rxq=1 --txq=1
> > --txd=8192 --rxd=8192 --nb-cores=1 --burst=128 -a --mbcache=512 --rss-
> udp test result:
> > frame size(bytes) offerd Load(%) packet loss rate
> > 128 15.69 0.000211
> > 256 14.148 0.0004
> > 512 14.148 0.00008
> > 1518 14.92 0.00099
> >
> > i'd like to ask, is this an issue with CX5 NIC? How can i debug it to
> eliminate the packet drops?
> >
> > 韩康康
> > mailto:961373042@qq.com
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-28 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tencent_32F472A487C557D466BA2338E4FDF710A609@qq.com>
[not found] ` <MN6PR12MB85678369DDCB1509C887F66ADF812@MN6PR12MB8567.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <PH7PR12MB69057F67A8521352451073A3D0812@PH7PR12MB6905.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
2025-04-28 7:01 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2025-04-28 7:02 ` Bing Zhao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH7PR12MB69059E026DBEEA69D29A04D6D0812@PH7PR12MB6905.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=bingz@nvidia.com \
--cc=961373042@qq.com \
--cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).