From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62E511C5 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:00:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id r129so140369284wmr.1 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zt14yTP3y+BEbbqJaeEnJNKWvxQ82hVtsQf2BWJvfJ8=; b=NX/V1iXINITzdBGDs/tdkaNW6TmInm3d+Qc7+SWOtFo/p4ZdDba2p6civhjPrI5ysq dlboZShh7x0z8kbkJ3TcwylVPrZornznpEskypZkqSX/4W03pzsHn6WWVFedRWUEhzNQ ronsPG6SZMWEQ8F6Ox745j9fpty7o3Nvw4bgQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zt14yTP3y+BEbbqJaeEnJNKWvxQ82hVtsQf2BWJvfJ8=; b=j/FZK/JN2ZTfXyx1gVLRXA4MKBGmsZRdGItp/6uy9hTCNmhF7G7pHBQ9cLd8sn9rZ7 dH3Cn1tKomZvCyEILgka+6g/b/NbCoZJ7nhpmYHUQJ95VCTYvXzztOyr9xTgkkBKhCwh 3JSzikFNRLR8U+tPXO5r2RU2J3mDWZYfYFryRxB5bMs7lk79wwuLXSi3Pef/tavWzQlP aJ3IlmE4JrezFuz7Vn9vTtizoRNnfcPWD4eRZMjeXawoQlT1X9bedXkRWCB/7Q5o8vlL bzGbtyqGaAm2BXoCqZ3+WxO1FBcP4kFBcL9f1vjJjRru2Hqb9RAp+Rqt4P8KGHv7K5hJ SUZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJXXUytJrwGuQId9GGO400MOVJwN2Q5hPuLSYJoKPH5krbQ0+75z60VkOpcGmAKU6N8U2qDIMDSPidoLtn6 X-Received: by 10.28.22.213 with SMTP id 204mr28142121wmw.12.1458745207579; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Murali Krishna References: <23529361.xgbDrcMi19@xps13> <9791503.gmfYu7J9gH@xps13> In-Reply-To: <9791503.gmfYu7J9gH@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJRxtgJpEYobZtFz0Nf6pAO+CmszwGc+ChDAn9POBgCICIM8J40t4ZQ Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:30:07 +0530 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] dpdk 2.2.0 build failure on Rhel 6.8 Beta 1 Kernel X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:00:08 -0000 After disabling KNI(CONFIG_RTE_KNI_KMOD=3Dn), dpdk 2.2.0 got compiled successfully on Rhel 6.8 Kernel(2.6.32-621.el6.x86_64). Thanks, Murali -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:20 PM To: Murali Krishna Cc: users@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] dpdk 2.2.0 build failure on Rhel 6.8 Beta 1 Kerne= l 2016-03-23 20:08, Murali Krishna: > Hi Thomas, > > I tried workaround 1, 2 and 3. > > 1. I still see some errors after disabling igb_uio(setting > CONFIG_RTE_EAL_IGB_UIO=3Dn in x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/.config) in the > same kernel(2.6.32-621.el6.x86_64). Please see the attachment for > detailed error information. You must disable KNI which is also failing: CONFIG_RTE_KNI_KMOD=3Dn > 2. I tried to build dpdk 2.2.0 on Rhel7.2 > kernel(3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64) and I didn=E2=80=99t see any errors. > > 3. I tried to compile older DPDKs(DPDK 1.7.1, DPDK 1.8.0 and DPDK > 2.0.0) on the same Rhel6.8 kernel(2.6.32-621.el6.x86_64). I am seeing > the same errors which I observed while building dpdk 2.2.0 when I try > to compile older DPDKs(DPDK 1.7.1, DPDK 1.8.0 and DPDK 2.0.0) It is hard to maintain these out of tree modules for kernels receiving a lo= t of backports. > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > 2016-03-23 19:04, Murali Krishna: > > [root@Rhel68B1 dpdk-2.2.0]# cat /etc/redhat-release > > > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.8 Beta (Santiago) > > > > [root@Rhel68B1 dpdk-2.2.0]# uname -a > > > > Linux Rhel68B1 2.6.32-621.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 24 00:07:06 EST > > 2016 > > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > [...] > > /root/dpdk-2.2.0/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/build/lib/librte_eal/linuxa= pp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c:213: > > error: =E2=80=98PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT=E2=80=99 undeclared (first = use in this > > function) > [...] > > Is there any workaround for this? > > Yes there are a lot of workarounds (see the 4 proposals below). > igb_uio is an out-of-tree kernel module. > We are replacing it with upstream modules uio_pci_generic or vfio. > > 1/ Try to disable igb_uio in your config > (x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/.config): > CONFIG_RTE_EAL_IGB_UIO=3Dn > 2/ If you want igb_uio, you should upgrade your kernel 3/ If you want > to keep this kernel, you can try an older DPDK version 4/ If you want > to keep this kernel and this DPDK, you can try to fix > the issue and submit a patch to dev@dpdk.org.