From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from obelix.eantc.de (ns.eantc.com [89.27.172.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DA42F7D for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:04:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.eantc.de ([192.168.100.100] helo=localhost) by obelix.eantc.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1dsRwk-0006yY-Op for users@dpdk.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:04:38 +0200 Received: from [192.168.100.5] (helo=[192.168.100.5]) by eantc.de with ESMTP (eXpurgate 4.1.9) (envelope-from ) id 59ba6246-0fba-c0a864640019-c0a86405cc57-1 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:04:38 +0200 To: users@dpdk.org From: Jan Kropidlowski Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:04:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: [dpdk-users] PktGen and KNI X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:04:39 -0000 Hi team, i'm currently try to bind multiple DPDK processes to one 10G port. This works fine, but we can't run a PktGen test and a KNI process simultaneously. Is this a architectural limitation? The main goal is, to provide sample line traffic and run services like OSPF on the same port. Thanks in advance, -- Jan Kropidlowski