From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com (mail-it0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB06E5D for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:18:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f190so1628400ita.5 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 23:18:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mayadata-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=reply-to:from:subject:organization:to:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language; bh=efM/mafcKBArQLx03icXgx60OxeJx4Ub+/Pehrh3j48=; b=q2BJRQXqU9uFt5v/MBxEd/Dw7mS2tUc81B8eDITxGA/fXG0FC16eTFwrNR4EbWYOCC wMP5FNOyYFuDfSld3L2g2Tn1bTCkbQ1NznfEYrRB7LgstDuRFeEL0aSd2TuKsQ9n+KMA m9A15aPDrLn8uqTCMXD80cGU+KkG2XRJ7/u9uJcBHXyiD9EsVepSoJua1RK1IYPeZM70 QBSNHkz2bPyYZL7PiqjmaPTpZn9uFezuDeaqspKLWNqA31x0YOYA9PAVVmB564dHc4Bt o+Ekjq+7SDyzMWsnX3Pt8BnzFz742LJ2g297KQ+ye22EtJ1qymcQtj/gF2fjVuwKcug5 GOZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:from:subject:organization:to:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language; bh=efM/mafcKBArQLx03icXgx60OxeJx4Ub+/Pehrh3j48=; b=OWihQVmlu7HQirq87Vvpn8Uusm1CdpQlMAYfR09oDz6oTaM3GJ7IgJz9mLXKiJHhlr h9TDaRWvWOP5FjILLVFpJJXmBTKYC/FTd7PZOjb5H1zBsAVWXhCdWeD8hJUZ+58z5qBN KvFG4chpgTndhE/8ysyZxBNG360gqeIWcnG0QZK5u8n0592KdhdBkcn6XWa6cova1W92 pEv+66TElpISCoFxaqsTDAJ3A9Ma81gqSPec7rZYZt1XtxCaOrV480nCgh4x2W+bxP4l wMfxHH6u4ocQq4/KgScSCuwrTJ5TKEgY/2x89zWUs8XXtu3q098uAo9uTLyIdra7sL/c PZJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKn1n8/adLQHmNJxSkqV51y3cK9U+ZvWLfWoH0usMeLRjdvjbqw hnHzd0dJyjIAZFJuw9REWum7kdYFqNQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouyF+brSH/VKGa0y9iIOOn/URgdP12U0FLh7j8P1KnX52Xplw1nwt+PeI+VTDCmGQ/LcyG0Tg== X-Received: by 10.36.122.17 with SMTP id a17mr2277517itc.30.1513667896374; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 23:18:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.100.170] ([106.51.36.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm832151ita.38.2017.12.18.23.18.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 23:18:14 -0800 (PST) From: Mayank Organization: MayaData To: users@dpdk.org Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:48:11 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] DPDK aware application to use with docker X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: mayank.patel@mayadata.io List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 07:18:18 -0000 Hi All, i want to use DPDK with docker in my current setup. My setup is as below: Here, docker 1 is running server application and docker 2/3 are running client application.(Here, client can be multiple containers in single node or with multiple nodes) Client is connected with server using TCP connection. Now, I want to use DPDK to handle heavy network load from client. what could be the possible solution here? Regards, Mayank