From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <remes@netcope.com> Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627DB4C57 for <web@dpdk.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:20:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c184so23714811wmd.0 for <web@dpdk.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 05:20:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netcope.com; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Fl+v3Tt9iUKJJ7b3OBzsXi7ZEjlex5JeehI7nmEjQNI=; b=Yp1h2DSDG0YB6Ed5Fb649XnaLNawXpXEIrjnSuXHcd7GgQqiq3xj57xcu4yCHj4C1T g7uX6iBdREoBlv1SrRIJTRVUuMtY0OZZgD3TxslR9pKA+evPT4guA2Jiu/tpvZ1ZXKaz rlUU77I0gVwhThxyVG5O/vbI2mHU8n3A9qzGJ8J534TGEnWp64MgOX7AIk1Kq7hNED7k tG3h2mTVDcL6N8a6qjoQvwWbqPsjBqr1rVbL/IEH74abgOlNoPmOXP5MASrgtzeWbl04 7QEqAjc8qOcAlRKLptLgYYvODa3wHomZVBp+wN6HGKy1UyixKDSPYoclQCWwwd82eY3a 9IZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Fl+v3Tt9iUKJJ7b3OBzsXi7ZEjlex5JeehI7nmEjQNI=; b=exkPYsUQZk753afbZh8+LVfXlkj8P0f4vXb7nkHdAKUGsmLdpvlyfBIaHEE8T72HLr W1F/VbqkurJGqVvX8dkaRvd4uWIDF5/O0W8C6pV1P/fr1Ji6oW7ZnMZQdubcZRcgi0G9 vW0r95EQNysWUdzzy1weQm4zSaKoMxHiL7A/KpTll4HlpPgwNyYLQJWwvaabLAZSTWKB YmHdCrUUVgS1wKvaVQIPGtKlAb/Z3ljD7aOzabyOQ5yPNf/mHCTmGbiJYpHYECB2VPEA Nols0/8RFDgYC0oDL925J+Iys6S9ZDYmWG1Jap2l9dISuMjgmD7zytVh4tvp8xDsw7UG f7ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113cb9aavDCIxULi6cwJPnYs56ehMblICWN6xhiqZO8nlTBi0BMW aD6JT7xekkgA1oOYCszlhA== X-Received: by 10.28.210.149 with SMTP id j143mr4390229wmg.146.1500898833691; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 05:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.9.14] ([185.24.237.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l46sm15201737wrl.15.2017.07.24.05.20.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 05:20:33 -0700 (PDT) To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Cc: web@dpdk.org References: <405afab7-13ce-6f84-e88d-7be6b4de67cf@netcope.com> <4618950.NuQ0IOWWot@xps> From: Jan Remes <remes@netcope.com> Message-ID: <34c56bfb-3e53-4caa-39cd-1e11b6f3be6f@netcope.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:20:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4618950.NuQ0IOWWot@xps> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add 17.05 Netcope performance report X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance <web.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/web>, <mailto:web-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/web/> List-Post: <mailto:web@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:web-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/web>, <mailto:web-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:20:34 -0000 Oh, sorry, I missed that. Of course, moving Netcope below is OK. On 24.7.2017 14:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > 24/07/2017 13:41, Jan Remes: >> Signed-off-by: Jan Remes <remes@netcope.com> >> --- >> --- a/doc.html >> +++ b/doc.html >> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ >> </ul> >> <h2>Performance Reports</h2> >> <ul> >> + <li><a href="http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_17_05_Netcope_NIC_performance_report.pdf">DPDK 17.05 Netcope NIC Performance Report</a> >> <li><a href="http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_17_05_Intel_NIC_performance_report.pdf">DPDK 17.05 Intel NIC Performance Report</a> >> <li><a href="http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_17_05_Intel_virtio_performance_report.pdf">DPDK 17.05 Intel Vhost/Virtio Performance Report</a> >> <li><a href="http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_17_05_Mellanox_NIC_performance_report.pdf">DPDK 17.05 Mellanox NIC Performance Report</a> > Until now, the applied policy is to sort NIC vendors alphabetically. > OK to move Netcope below?