From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f178.google.com (mail-wj0-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6492A10A7 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:20:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f178.google.com with SMTP id xy5so61526886wjc.0 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 03:20:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QRbmWyRAUgEwQ2wzB3fayxc1wHPpOCpQhXSPr2J/IfA=; b=Ha/g9I2qhEg5JjLRYh/Su5DYMJF0f+jWX99vHYbdXq4gu/skxk+g+G2mgNgQZLSldd q7fQzHWGrfpAWAVKkCoBWp3gNygyeXTntV1ZmqZa7KPlDsY+V4ee0FwcsKpksIIX2wa0 WPCoNamfInd80+9anjAs2iQU3v+yiiiKnYy5KQ70BX7Idv5VVynqAkNWhj34tAeQ0R+w pyJ20YMRWxps7w1yPHuY3GGYAu8nmQr4n/o5uxcSHjK7d7T8S2v/2kbvEAKSq9EWTAL1 J77j8ZZ59WcFbgFVhYSmrqGl5ry2sE/UUP7Ch30sg8qfZUJjC8EVSRrAIm9YxjXwTuha utlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QRbmWyRAUgEwQ2wzB3fayxc1wHPpOCpQhXSPr2J/IfA=; b=d/t7kHLP2YqGwrmjEsLIdrAZP+SvjKpoPCHVQvuMYBFtdvUtfe+XNdiF88BJHsfEM8 Vtr0GGIOVMP4bCMCUFWA3O485vOej4kswHhodtokx2O0FAK2sTwG+TDMUu0dzDAA8i2+ /lZtKWUBGGs40VG3HehpWnwnEpDVsVIxqEgNVMTWIdKFqsft/eT3fBoB/kxZs+Ox3J/o tS1OQCwdm4xtawlqFNPxJJOJwlfPJFNXn65Fel1cFQVEvzv6DUCzSuF8jVEiA2SYjXCE xvbQ0sdIWohsmFCN5RmaEv/3/v5Tzp+pJsjQ7a1/VM2iVxHJVH/DN7MmUF3LCj7fyG65 BNiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00BEXGsj6tdpmarn3nX68AReB34rxwiQMA1awzjkDLxO4445h/xQplmCM9HZjMrI8xy X-Received: by 10.194.9.34 with SMTP id w2mr900805wja.24.1481800849146; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 03:20:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q65sm12016017wmd.6.2016.12.15.03.20.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 03:20:48 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: James Poole , john.mcnamara@intel.com Cc: web@dpdk.org, walter.e.gilmore@intel.com Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:20:47 +0100 Message-ID: <3571351.Ppr3Ib5sf1@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1481101637-5907-1-git-send-email-james.g.poole@intel.com> References: <1481101637-5907-1-git-send-email-james.g.poole@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add 16.11 performance report to documentation X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:20:49 -0000 2016-12-07 09:07, James Poole: >> +

Performance Reports

> + This first report is online at http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/Intel_DPDK_R16_11_NIC_performance_report.pdf Before applying this web patch, I was thinking the title on the web page should better match the filename, i.e. adding "Intel" and "NIC" words. What do you think of "DPDK 16.11 Intel NIC Performance Report"?