[dpdk-web] [PATCH] add 16.11 performance report to documentation

[dpdk-web] [PATCH] add 16.11 performance report to documentation

[James Poole]

Signed-off-by: James Poole <james.g.poole@intel.com>
---
 doc.html | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc.html b/doc.html
index 2d6116d..680f7ce 100644
--- a/doc.html
+++ b/doc.html
@@ -67,6 +67,10 @@
 				<li>Unmaintained driver for VMware ESXi vmxnet3 without uio: <a href="/doc/vmxnet3-usermap">vmxnet3-usermap</a>.
 			</ul>
 			</ul>
+			<h2>Performance Reports</h2>
+			<ul>
+				<li><a href="http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/Intel_DPDK_R16_11_NIC_performance_report.pdf">DPDK 16.11 Performance Report</a>
+			</ul>
 			<h2>Training</h2>
 			<p>List of resources available online:</p>
 			<ul>
-- 
2.5.5

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add 16.11 performance report to documentation

[Mcnamara, John]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Poole, James G
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 9:07 AM
> To: web@dpdk.org
> Cc: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Gilmore, Walter E
> <walter.e.gilmore@intel.com>; Poole, James G <james.g.poole@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] add 16.11 performance report to documentation
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Poole <james.g.poole@intel.com>

Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add 16.11 performance report to documentation

[Thomas Monjalon]

2016-12-07 09:07, James Poole:
>> +			<h2>Performance Reports</h2>
> +			<ul>
> +				<li><a href="http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/Intel_DPDK_R16_11_NIC_performance_report.pdf">DPDK 16.11 Performance Report</a>
> +			</ul>

This first report is online at http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/Intel_DPDK_R16_11_NIC_performance_report.pdf

Before applying this web patch, I was thinking the title on the web page
should better match the filename, i.e. adding "Intel" and "NIC" words.
What do you think of "DPDK 16.11 Intel NIC Performance Report"?

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add 16.11 performance report to documentation

[Mcnamara, John]

+ Qian, Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 11:21 AM
> To: Poole, James G <james.g.poole@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> Cc: web@dpdk.org; Gilmore, Walter E <walter.e.gilmore@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add 16.11 performance report to
> documentation
> 
> 2016-12-07 09:07, James Poole:
> >> +			<h2>Performance Reports</h2>
> > +			<ul>
> > +				<li><a
> href="http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/Intel_DPDK_R16_11_NIC_performance_report.pdf">DPDK 16.11 Performance Report</a>
> > +			</ul>
> 
> This first report is online at
> http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/Intel_DPDK_R16_11_NIC_performance_report.pdf
> 
> Before applying this web patch, I was thinking the title on the web page
> should better match the filename, i.e. adding "Intel" and "NIC" words.
> What do you think of "DPDK 16.11 Intel NIC Performance Report"?

Hi Thomas,

I think that name change would be okay.

John

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add 16.11 performance report to documentation

[Thomas Monjalon]

2016-12-15 11:48, Mcnamara, John:
> + Qian, Tim
> 
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > 
> > 2016-12-07 09:07, James Poole:
> > >> +			<h2>Performance Reports</h2>
> > > +			<ul>
> > > +				<li><a
> > href="http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/Intel_DPDK_R16_11_NIC_performance_report.pdf">DPDK 16.11 Performance Report</a>
> > > +			</ul>
> > 
> > This first report is online at
> > http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/Intel_DPDK_R16_11_NIC_performance_report.pdf
> > 
> > Before applying this web patch, I was thinking the title on the web page
> > should better match the filename, i.e. adding "Intel" and "NIC" words.
> > What do you think of "DPDK 16.11 Intel NIC Performance Report"?
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> I think that name change would be okay.

Applied, thanks

Check here: http://dpdk.org/doc