From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEC8A04B5 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:05:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84081BE82; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:05:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3E21BE82 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:05:06 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2019 06:05:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,277,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="242854593" Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2019 06:05:04 -0800 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.139]) by IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:05:03 +0000 From: "Richardson, Bruce" To: Thomas Monjalon , Kevin Traynor , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "David Marchand" , Luca Boccassi CC: "web@dpdk.org" , "Mcnamara, John" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-web] [PATCH v2] update latest LTS as 19.11 Thread-Index: AQHVqpxBOBcH7JyeZUGHU5g2vmaA96ep/L0AgAAB+QCAAAOagA== Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:05:03 +0000 Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B07EE85BBA@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20191204120633.85112-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20191204121301.86049-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <051c9229-d249-1c08-1dd3-f4b9d604610f@redhat.com> <9666270.atiki9bGxj@xps> In-Reply-To: <9666270.atiki9bGxj@xps> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZTZmMTc2MDEtNjhiMC00MjQzLTljNGMtN2YwNDVmNzhiZDBiIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiNVQ3Vyt1azFaeWlQQlVRUmJhYnZZamlPaUN0Mk42RTdPVDlrNXFlMkRhcm53TlwvNUdWc2hmUm9MaG8yS3NMUmMifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH v2] update latest LTS as 19.11 X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: web-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "web" > -----Original Message----- > From: web On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 1:52 PM > To: Kevin Traynor ; Yigit, Ferruh > ; David Marchand ; Luc= a > Boccassi > Cc: web@dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John > Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH v2] update latest LTS as 19.11 >=20 > 04/12/2019 14:44, Kevin Traynor: > > On 04/12/2019 12:13, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > > Latest Stable\ > > > > If the intention is to point it to the latest version of the latest > > LTS, can we change it to 'Latest LTS'. I think it avoids some ambiguity= , > e.g. > > if for some reason 20.02 was going to have a stable branch, it could > > claim to be 'latest stable' too. >=20 > Good question. > What is the most interesting to highlight here? > Latest LTS version or Latest stable version including short term? >=20 >=20 My 2c. Latest LTS all the way! That's what we want to steer people towards.