[dpdk-web] [PATCH] add LTS maintainer emails

[dpdk-web] [PATCH] add LTS maintainer emails

[Ferruh Yigit]

Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
---
 content/roadmap/_index.md | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/content/roadmap/_index.md b/content/roadmap/_index.md
index c6f6459e07e8..2ddc2da38832 100644
--- a/content/roadmap/_index.md
+++ b/content/roadmap/_index.md
@@ -127,8 +127,11 @@ regression tests are run, and if clear, the stable release is announced.
 Typically a new stable release version follows a mainline release
 by 1-2 weeks, depending on the test results.
 
-| Current version | Next version  | Next version Date | End of life | Maintainer     |
-|----------|----------|-------------------|---------------------|--------------------|
-| 18.11.11 | -        | -                 | December 2020 (EOL) | -                  |
-| 19.11.7  | 19.11.8  | June 2021         | November 2021 (LTS) | Christian Ehrhardt |
-| 20.11.1  | 20.11.2  | June 2021         | November 2022 (LTS) | Luca Boccassi      |
+| Current version | Next version  | Next version Date | End of life | Maintainer          |
+|----------|----------|-------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|
+| 18.11.11 | -        | -                 | December 2020 (EOL) | -                       |
+| 19.11.7  | 19.11.8  | June 2021         | November 2021 (LTS) | [Christian Ehrhardt][1] |
+| 20.11.1  | 20.11.2  | June 2021         | November 2022 (LTS) | [Luca Boccassi][2]      |
+
+[1]: mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com
+[2]: mailto:bluca@debian.org
-- 
2.30.2

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add LTS maintainer emails

[Thomas Monjalon]

23/03/2021 17:57, Ferruh Yigit:
> +[1]: mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com
> +[2]: mailto:bluca@debian.org

Is there a specific reason for adding emails?
We should prefer public discussions on stable@dpdk.org.

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add LTS maintainer emails

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 3/23/2021 6:34 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 23/03/2021 17:57, Ferruh Yigit:
>> +[1]: mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com
>> +[2]: mailto:bluca@debian.org
> 
> Is there a specific reason for adding emails?
> We should prefer public discussions on stable@dpdk.org.
> 

To help accessing the maintainers, mail list can be too busy and it can be good 
to cc the maintainer even it is going to the mail list.

And I recognized the mail address of the LTS maintainers are not documented at 
all, they are not in the maintainers file too, so thought it will be good to 
document in this page.

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add LTS maintainer emails

[Thomas Monjalon]

24/03/2021 16:49, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 3/23/2021 6:34 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 23/03/2021 17:57, Ferruh Yigit:
> >> +[1]: mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com
> >> +[2]: mailto:bluca@debian.org
> > 
> > Is there a specific reason for adding emails?
> > We should prefer public discussions on stable@dpdk.org.
> > 
> 
> To help accessing the maintainers, mail list can be too busy and it can be good 
> to cc the maintainer even it is going to the mail list.
> 
> And I recognized the mail address of the LTS maintainers are not documented at 
> all, they are not in the maintainers file too, so thought it will be good to 
> document in this page.

They are in the MAINTAINERS file, but should be updated.

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add LTS maintainer emails

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 3/24/2021 4:58 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 24/03/2021 16:49, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 3/23/2021 6:34 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 23/03/2021 17:57, Ferruh Yigit:
>>>> +[1]: mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com
>>>> +[2]: mailto:bluca@debian.org
>>>
>>> Is there a specific reason for adding emails?
>>> We should prefer public discussions on stable@dpdk.org.
>>>
>>
>> To help accessing the maintainers, mail list can be too busy and it can be good
>> to cc the maintainer even it is going to the mail list.
>>
>> And I recognized the mail address of the LTS maintainers are not documented at
>> all, they are not in the maintainers file too, so thought it will be good to
>> document in this page.
> 
> They are in the MAINTAINERS file, but should be updated.
> 

Indeed, I missed it although I checked it before sending the patch, I guess I 
searched for LTS :/