Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] Update roadmap for the Broadcom's bnxt PMD

["Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: web [mailto:web-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 7:38 PM
> To: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
> Cc: web@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] Update roadmap for the Broadcom's bnxt PMD
> 
> 2017-03-01 13:26, Ajit Khaparde:
> > Please let me know if the list is worth being a part of the roadmap.
> > Or if it needs any modification.
> 
> Other items of the roadmap are only few words.
> I think we do not need this level of details, but others can have
> different opinions.
> Do you think it is useful to have drivers progress in the roadmap?
> If yes, it can be summed up with "Support more features in bnxt driver".
> 
> > > --- a/dev/roadmap.html
> > > +++ b/dev/roadmap.html
> > > @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@
> > >                 <li>Atomic Rules net/ark Arkville Driver
> > >                 <li>Xen Netfront Driver
> > >                 <li>New device types in vhost-user
> > > +               <li>Add more dev_ops like set_vf_rate_limit,
> > > set_vf_vlan_filter,
> > > +               set_vf_rx_mode, udp_tunnel_port_add/del, VLAN
> filtering and
> > > +               stripping, stateless tunnel offload, xstats_get/reset,
> > > +               set_mc_addr_list, mac_addr_set_op and update the HWRM
> API
> > > to
> > > +               version 1.7.1 to Broadcom's bnxt driver.

Hi,

I has a similar feeling, that there was too much detail in comparison to the other entries in the list.

How about "Add support for more operation in the Broadcom's bnxt driver and update the HWRM version to 1.7.1."

John