DPDK website maintenance
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "web@dpdk.org" <web@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] update Arm roadmap for 20.08
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:54:54 +0000
Message-ID: <DB6PR0802MB221618D245A2A1C1DBE8971B98820@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2523689.0iaz9iMqiZ@thomas>

Thanks Thomas for your comments.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 3:08 AM
> To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Cc: web@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] update Arm roadmap for 20.08
> 09/06/2020 05:28, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
> > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Additional explanation:
> Was announced in the dpdk-dev mailing list:
> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-June/169542.html
> > +- Bit operations APIs for PMDs
> > +- rte_atomic API deprecation with-in DPDK
> Deprecation is not a feature to coordinate in the roadmap I think.
Ok, no problem. I just wanted to make sure that the community is on-board in reviewing the patch and making decisions. I guess the proposal on the mailing list is enough for that?

> > +- Use C11 atomic semantics in mbuf, eventdev, eal interrupts
> > +- CPU frequency calculation using generic counter for Arm platforms
> > +- LPM library integration with RCU library
> I would word it in reverse order: isn't it the RCU lib which is integrated in LPM?
I guess it is more about which library was created first. I will reverse the order.

> > +- Change IO barriers to align with other-multi-copy atomicity memory
> model for Armv8-a
> I don't understand "other-multi-copy atomicity".
There were few references provided in the patch. They are at [1], [2] and [3]. But, I guess it is not clear what this work item means exactly. I can change it as follows:

"Change IO barriers to use 'DMB' instruction for Armv8-a"

The patch itself is trivial. But, it is a basic change affecting all the drivers for Arm platforms. So, I would like to call out everyone's attention.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=22ec71615d824f4f11d38d0e55a88d8956b7e45f
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6DayghhA8Q
[3] https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/armv8-mca/


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-09 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-09  3:28 Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-09  8:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-09 15:54   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-06-09 17:31     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DB6PR0802MB221618D245A2A1C1DBE8971B98820@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=web@dpdk.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK website maintenance

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/web/0 web/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 web web/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/web \
	public-inbox-index web

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git