From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB5446C6B; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 08:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1DC40263; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 08:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81E740156 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 08:36:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from loongson.cn (unknown [10.20.42.143]) by gateway (Coremail) with SMTP id _____8DxjXJOYIxohZE2AQ--.43177S3; Fri, 01 Aug 2025 14:35:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.20.42.143] (unknown [10.20.42.143]) by front1 (Coremail) with SMTP id qMiowJCxM+RKYIxor64wAA--.45755S3; Fri, 01 Aug 2025 14:35:56 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] update testing page test recheck support lab list To: Patrick Robb , thomas@monjalon.net Cc: web@dpdk.org, shaibran@amazon.com, aconole@redhat.com, rajesh.t.puttaswamy@intel.com References: <20250725163057.1059638-1-probb@iol.unh.edu> From: zhoumin Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 14:34:00 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux loongarch64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20250725163057.1059638-1-probb@iol.unh.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-CM-TRANSID: qMiowJCxM+RKYIxor64wAA--.45755S3 X-CM-SenderInfo: 52kr3ztlq6z05rqj20fqof0/1tbiAgEBAWiLBYYWRQABsx X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBj93XoW7Aw1DXw18Zry3GFWfJw13Awc_yoW8GF4Dpa 93W3W0vFyUJFy7JrnFvay8tF4rKr95Gr48GayUGa4UJ34Dt3WUKrWrtF45J347WrZ3XF4S 9ayYka47ua15AagCm3ZEXasCq-sJn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7KY7ZEXa sCq-sGcSsGvfJ3Ic02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ebIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy29KBjDU 0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvYb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2 IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r106r15M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48v e4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI 0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v2 6F4UJVW0owAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc804VCY07AIYIkI8VC2zVCFFI0UMc 02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAF wI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JMxk0xIA0c2IEe2xFo4 CEbIxvr21l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG 67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMI IYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E 14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJV W8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07j8yCJU UUUU= X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: web-bounces@dpdk.org On 2025/7/26 12:30AM, Patrick Robb wrote: > Loongson Lab and AWS Lab have both added additional support for the > DPDK test recheck framework in recent months. This patch adds updates > the testing page to reflect that fact. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Robb > --- > content/testing/_index.md | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md > index 31b464c..bd5a6dc 100644 > --- a/content/testing/_index.md > +++ b/content/testing/_index.md > @@ -133,9 +133,10 @@ when sending your recheck email. An example usage is provided below: > Recheck-request: rebase=main, iol-intel-Functional, iol-intel-Performance > ``` > > -Rechecks are currently supported by the UNH-IOL Community Lab, and the GitHub Actions robot, > -so just those Patchwork testing labels beginning wih "iol-" or "github-robot". > -IOL is the only lab supporting the re-apply (rebase) option. > +Rechecks are currently supported by the UNH-IOL Community Lab, the GitHub Actions Robot, > +the Loongson Lab, and the AWS Lab. From that group, UNH-IOL, Loongson, and AWS support > +the rebase argument, and the Github Robot does not. The Intel lab does not have any > +support for rechecks. > > ### Mainline Monitoring > Reviewed-by: Min Zhou Thanks Patrick Robb.