DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
To: Leyi Rong <leyi.rong@intel.com>
Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com,
	ferruh.yigit@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, talshn@nvidia.com,
	pallavi.kadam@intel.com, ranjit.menon@intel.com,
	beilei.xing@intel.com, aconole@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	ci@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix avx code error on MinGW
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 02:07:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210203020758.12cd8089@sovereign> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202143258.108477-1-leyi.rong@intel.com>

On Tue,  2 Feb 2021 22:32:58 +0800, Leyi Rong wrote:
> Adds extra cflags '-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables'
> to avoid the MinGW build error:
> 	Error: invalid register for .seh_savexmm
> 
> Fixes: 5c38c33f7880 ("net/i40e: disable AVX512 with MinGW")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leyi Rong <leyi.rong@intel.com>

Tested-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>

Re: -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables, when cross-compiling from Linux, I
observe bit-to-bit identical i40e_rxtx_vec_avx512.c.obj. My guess it that this
option somehow affects GCC inlining heuristics. Similar issue existed in
librte_acl (at least a year ago win GCC 6, I believe), where GCC generated
incorrect code unless certain functions had been inlined (caught by test
app). No an AVX expert, just my 2c.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02  9:06 [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] net/i40e: disable AVX512 with MinGW Leyi Rong
2021-02-02 10:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-02-02 14:13   ` Tal Shnaiderman
2021-02-02 14:31     ` Rong, Leyi
2021-02-02 14:32 ` [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix avx code error on MinGW Leyi Rong
2021-02-02 23:07   ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2021-02-04 10:41     ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z
2021-02-04 12:36       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-02-04 12:59         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-04 13:43         ` David Marchand
2021-02-04 21:57           ` Lincoln Lavoie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210203020758.12cd8089@sovereign \
    --to=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=leyi.rong@intel.com \
    --cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=ranjit.menon@intel.com \
    --cc=talshn@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).