DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Plsek <jplsek@iol.unh.edu>
To: ci@dpdk.org
Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu
Subject: [dpdk-ci] DPDK lab meeting agenda items 2018-07-31
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:47:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+xUZB57o2gLJbzWWAp-ev7-f3onnOqZriGM9gqy0BTopB3QpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi all,

We would like to discuss the following issues (which we did not get
into in the last meeting):

* Talk about finalizing the policies and procedures document that was
sent out as part of the minutes from the last meeting.
* How will the feature request process work? We would like to propose
that we create a new project in bugs.dpdk.org and use that as the
public-facing portal to track bugs and feature requests at a high
level. UNH-IOL will decide in which order to work on feature requests
and bug fixes, with input from the group. UNH-IOL may make
improvements to the dashboard over time as we see fit, but the group
must approve any changes that result in more vendor-specific
information being made publicly available through the dashboard before
it is made live.
* What will the process be for making the relative numbers for each
vendor public? Here are the scenarios that we are envisioning:
  - A vendor may choose to make results for a device all public or all
private.
  - A vendor may choose to make results public starting at date X.
  - A vendor may choose to make future results private leaving current
results public (to support experimental changes on a platform).
  - Anything missing from this list?


Functionality added/bugs fixed in the past 2 weeks:

* (from DPDK 2018-07-17 meeting) Added a way for members to provide
additional information about their hardware and setup. This is done by
vendors sending us a PDF of this information. Once we upload the PDF,
the "Environment Info" becomes a link to the PDF.
* Results not counted towards the overall result are now grayed out
and have a tooltip to make it more apparent that the results are not
part of the overall result.
* Fixed an issue where old patchsets would show up as incomplete when
a new environment was added.
* Added server-side and client-side caching of the home page and patchset view.


What we are working on right now:

* Adding the ability of getting the test logs produced by Jenkins from
the dashboard.
* Using the patchworks API for getting meta information instead of
storing that information in our database.

--
Jeremy Plsek
UNH InterOperability Laboratory

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-07-30 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+xUZB57o2gLJbzWWAp-ev7-f3onnOqZriGM9gqy0BTopB3QpQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jplsek@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).