DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <thomas@monjalon.net>, <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	<hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	<pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>, <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
	<declan.doherty@intel.com>, <matan@nvidia.com>, <g.singh@nxp.com>,
	<roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>, <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
	<asomalap@amd.com>, <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 23:43:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210731181327.660296-3-gakhil@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210731181327.660296-1-gakhil@marvell.com>

Asymmetric crypto APIs have been stable from
quite some time, hence moving them from experimental
to stable in DPDK 21.11

Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
---
 lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 10 ----------
 lib/cryptodev/version.map     | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
index 11f4e6fdbf..425f459143 100644
--- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
+++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
@@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_get(uint8_t dev_id,
  *   - Return description of the asymmetric crypto capability if exist.
  *   - Return NULL if the capability not exist.
  */
-__rte_experimental
 const struct rte_cryptodev_asymmetric_xform_capability *
 rte_cryptodev_asym_capability_get(uint8_t dev_id,
 		const struct rte_cryptodev_asym_capability_idx *idx);
@@ -317,7 +316,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_check_aead(
  *   - Return 1 if the op type is supported
  *   - Return 0 if unsupported
  */
-__rte_experimental
 int
 rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_optype(
 	const struct rte_cryptodev_asymmetric_xform_capability *capability,
@@ -333,7 +331,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_optype(
  *   - Return 0 if the parameters are in range of the capability.
  *   - Return -1 if the parameters are out of range of the capability.
  */
-__rte_experimental
 int
 rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_modlen(
 	const struct rte_cryptodev_asymmetric_xform_capability *capability,
@@ -395,7 +392,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_aead_algo_enum(enum rte_crypto_aead_algorithm *algo_enum,
  * - Return -1 if string is not valid
  * - Return 0 if the string is valid
  */
-__rte_experimental
 int
 rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_enum(enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type *xform_enum,
 		const char *xform_string);
@@ -1192,7 +1188,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_sym_session_create(struct rte_mempool *mempool);
  *  - On success return pointer to asym-session
  *  - On failure returns NULL
  */
-__rte_experimental
 struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session *
 rte_cryptodev_asym_session_create(struct rte_mempool *mempool);
 
@@ -1223,7 +1218,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_sym_session_free(struct rte_cryptodev_sym_session *sess);
  *  - -EINVAL if session is NULL.
  *  - -EBUSY if not all device private data has been freed.
  */
-__rte_experimental
 int
 rte_cryptodev_asym_session_free(struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session *sess);
 
@@ -1264,7 +1258,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_sym_session_init(uint8_t dev_id,
  *  - -ENOTSUP if crypto device does not support the crypto transform.
  *  - -ENOMEM if the private session could not be allocated.
  */
-__rte_experimental
 int
 rte_cryptodev_asym_session_init(uint8_t dev_id,
 			struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session *sess,
@@ -1299,7 +1292,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_sym_session_clear(uint8_t dev_id,
  *  - 0 if successful.
  *  - -EINVAL if device is invalid or session is NULL.
  */
-__rte_experimental
 int
 rte_cryptodev_asym_session_clear(uint8_t dev_id,
 			struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session *sess);
@@ -1336,7 +1328,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_sym_get_existing_header_session_size(
  * @return
  *   Size of the asymmetric header session.
  */
-__rte_experimental
 unsigned int
 rte_cryptodev_asym_get_header_session_size(void);
 
@@ -1364,7 +1355,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_sym_get_private_session_size(uint8_t dev_id);
  *   - Size of the asymmetric private data, if successful
  *   - 0 if device is invalid or does not have private session
  */
-__rte_experimental
 unsigned int
 rte_cryptodev_asym_get_private_session_size(uint8_t dev_id);
 
diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/version.map b/lib/cryptodev/version.map
index 9f04737aed..707a2e32d3 100644
--- a/lib/cryptodev/version.map
+++ b/lib/cryptodev/version.map
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-DPDK_21 {
+DPDK_22 {
 	global:
 
 	rte_crypto_aead_algorithm_strings;
@@ -9,6 +9,18 @@ DPDK_21 {
 	rte_crypto_cipher_operation_strings;
 	rte_crypto_op_pool_create;
 	rte_cryptodev_allocate_driver;
+
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_capability_get;
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_get_header_session_size;
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_get_private_session_size;
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_enum;
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_session_clear;
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_session_create;
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_session_free;
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_session_init;
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_modlen;
+	rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_optype;
+
 	rte_cryptodev_callback_register;
 	rte_cryptodev_callback_unregister;
 	rte_cryptodev_close;
@@ -61,16 +73,6 @@ DPDK_21 {
 EXPERIMENTAL {
 	global:
 
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_capability_get;
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_get_header_session_size;
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_get_private_session_size;
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_enum;
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_session_clear;
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_session_create;
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_session_free;
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_session_init;
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_modlen;
-	rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_optype;
 	rte_cryptodev_sym_cpu_crypto_process;
 	rte_cryptodev_sym_get_existing_header_session_size;
 	rte_cryptodev_sym_session_get_user_data;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-31 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-31 18:13 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] cryptodev and security ABI improvements Akhil Goyal
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Akhil Goyal
2021-07-31 18:13 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2021-08-30 15:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-09-03 15:17     ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 11:42       ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-09-07 11:45         ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-08 12:37           ` Kinsella, Ray
2023-02-02 10:49             ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-02-02 11:02               ` Hemant Agrawal
2023-02-14 18:05               ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 15:54   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 15:55   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-15 16:43   ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-31 18:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] cryptodev and security ABI improvements Akhil Goyal
2021-10-08 20:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Akhil Goyal
2021-10-08 20:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-10-12  8:50     ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-08 20:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-10-11  8:31     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-11 16:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-10-11 22:15         ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-10-12  8:31           ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12  6:59         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12  8:53           ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12  8:50     ` [dpdk-dev] " Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-11 10:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Zhang, Roy Fan
2021-10-12  9:55   ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 10:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-10-12 10:50       ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 11:28         ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 11:34           ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 11:52             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 13:38               ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 13:54                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 14:18                   ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 14:47                     ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 15:06                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-13  5:36                         ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-13  7:02                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-13  7:04                             ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-13  8:39                               ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-18  5:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-10-18  5:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-10-18 15:39       ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210731181327.660296-3-gakhil@marvell.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=asomalap@amd.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).