DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <thomas@monjalon.net>, <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	<hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	<konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, <ciara.power@intel.com>,
	<ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	<ndabilpuram@marvell.com>, <vattunuru@marvell.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/10] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 00:55:26 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220416192530.173895-7-gakhil@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220416192530.173895-1-gakhil@marvell.com>

Added cases to test anti replay for inline IPsec processing
with and without extended sequence number support.

Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
---
 app/test/test_security_inline_proto.c | 308 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 308 insertions(+)

diff --git a/app/test/test_security_inline_proto.c b/app/test/test_security_inline_proto.c
index 209999d02c..f8d6adc88f 100644
--- a/app/test/test_security_inline_proto.c
+++ b/app/test/test_security_inline_proto.c
@@ -1092,6 +1092,136 @@ test_ipsec_inline_proto_all(const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags)
 		return TEST_SKIPPED;
 }
 
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_proto_process_with_esn(struct ipsec_test_data td[],
+		struct ipsec_test_data res_d[],
+		int nb_pkts,
+		bool silent,
+		const struct ipsec_test_flags *flags)
+{
+	struct rte_security_session_conf sess_conf = {0};
+	struct ipsec_test_data *res_d_tmp = NULL;
+	struct rte_crypto_sym_xform cipher = {0};
+	struct rte_crypto_sym_xform auth = {0};
+	struct rte_crypto_sym_xform aead = {0};
+	struct rte_mbuf *rx_pkt = NULL;
+	struct rte_mbuf *tx_pkt = NULL;
+	int nb_rx, nb_sent;
+	struct rte_security_session *ses;
+	struct rte_security_ctx *ctx;
+	uint32_t ol_flags;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	if (td[0].aead) {
+		sess_conf.crypto_xform = &aead;
+	} else {
+		if (td[0].ipsec_xform.direction ==
+				RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS) {
+			sess_conf.crypto_xform = &cipher;
+			sess_conf.crypto_xform->type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
+			sess_conf.crypto_xform->next = &auth;
+			sess_conf.crypto_xform->next->type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
+		} else {
+			sess_conf.crypto_xform = &auth;
+			sess_conf.crypto_xform->type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
+			sess_conf.crypto_xform->next = &cipher;
+			sess_conf.crypto_xform->next->type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* Create Inline IPsec session. */
+	ret = create_inline_ipsec_session(&td[0], port_id, &ses, &ctx,
+					  &ol_flags, flags, &sess_conf);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (td[0].ipsec_xform.direction == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS)
+		create_default_flow(port_id);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
+		tx_pkt = init_packet(mbufpool, td[i].input_text.data,
+					td[i].input_text.len);
+		if (tx_pkt == NULL) {
+			ret = TEST_FAILED;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		if (test_ipsec_pkt_update(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(tx_pkt,
+					uint8_t *, RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN), flags)) {
+			ret = TEST_FAILED;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		if (td[i].ipsec_xform.direction ==
+				RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS) {
+			if (flags->antireplay) {
+				sess_conf.ipsec.esn.value =
+						td[i].ipsec_xform.esn.value;
+				ret = rte_security_session_update(ctx, ses,
+						&sess_conf);
+				if (ret) {
+					printf("Could not update ESN in session\n");
+					rte_pktmbuf_free(tx_pkt);
+					goto out;
+				}
+			}
+			if (ol_flags & RTE_SECURITY_TX_OLOAD_NEED_MDATA)
+				rte_security_set_pkt_metadata(ctx, ses,
+						tx_pkt, NULL);
+			tx_pkt->ol_flags |= RTE_MBUF_F_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD;
+		}
+		/* Send packet to ethdev for inline IPsec processing. */
+		nb_sent = rte_eth_tx_burst(port_id, 0, &tx_pkt, 1);
+		if (nb_sent != 1) {
+			printf("\nUnable to TX packets");
+			rte_pktmbuf_free(tx_pkt);
+			ret = TEST_FAILED;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		rte_pause();
+
+		/* Receive back packet on loopback interface. */
+		do {
+			rte_delay_ms(1);
+			nb_rx = rte_eth_rx_burst(port_id, 0, &rx_pkt, 1);
+		} while (nb_rx == 0);
+
+		rte_pktmbuf_adj(rx_pkt, RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
+
+		if (res_d != NULL)
+			res_d_tmp = &res_d[i];
+
+		ret = test_ipsec_post_process(rx_pkt, &td[i],
+					      res_d_tmp, silent, flags);
+		if (ret != TEST_SUCCESS) {
+			rte_pktmbuf_free(rx_pkt);
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		ret = test_ipsec_stats_verify(ctx, ses, flags,
+					td->ipsec_xform.direction);
+		if (ret != TEST_SUCCESS) {
+			rte_pktmbuf_free(rx_pkt);
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		rte_pktmbuf_free(rx_pkt);
+		rx_pkt = NULL;
+		tx_pkt = NULL;
+		res_d_tmp = NULL;
+	}
+
+out:
+	if (td->ipsec_xform.direction == RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS)
+		destroy_default_flow(port_id);
+
+	/* Destroy session so that other cases can create the session again */
+	rte_security_session_destroy(ctx, ses);
+	ses = NULL;
+
+	return ret;
+}
 
 static int
 ut_setup_inline_ipsec(void)
@@ -1701,6 +1831,153 @@ test_ipsec_inline_proto_known_vec_fragmented(const void *test_data)
 	return test_ipsec_inline_proto_process(&td_outb, NULL, 1, false,
 						&flags);
 }
+
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_pkt_replay(const void *test_data, const uint64_t esn[],
+		      bool replayed_pkt[], uint32_t nb_pkts, bool esn_en,
+		      uint64_t winsz)
+{
+	struct ipsec_test_data td_outb[IPSEC_TEST_PACKETS_MAX];
+	struct ipsec_test_data td_inb[IPSEC_TEST_PACKETS_MAX];
+	struct ipsec_test_flags flags;
+	uint32_t i, ret = 0;
+
+	memset(&flags, 0, sizeof(flags));
+	flags.antireplay = true;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
+		memcpy(&td_outb[i], test_data, sizeof(td_outb));
+		td_outb[i].ipsec_xform.options.iv_gen_disable = 1;
+		td_outb[i].ipsec_xform.replay_win_sz = winsz;
+		td_outb[i].ipsec_xform.options.esn = esn_en;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++)
+		td_outb[i].ipsec_xform.esn.value = esn[i];
+
+	ret = test_ipsec_inline_proto_process_with_esn(td_outb, td_inb,
+				nb_pkts, true, &flags);
+	if (ret != TEST_SUCCESS)
+		return ret;
+
+	test_ipsec_td_update(td_inb, td_outb, nb_pkts, &flags);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
+		td_inb[i].ipsec_xform.options.esn = esn_en;
+		/* Set antireplay flag for packets to be dropped */
+		td_inb[i].ar_packet = replayed_pkt[i];
+	}
+
+	ret = test_ipsec_inline_proto_process_with_esn(td_inb, NULL, nb_pkts,
+				true, &flags);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay(const void *test_data, uint64_t winsz)
+{
+
+	uint32_t nb_pkts = 5;
+	bool replayed_pkt[5];
+	uint64_t esn[5];
+
+	/* 1. Advance the TOP of the window to WS * 2 */
+	esn[0] = winsz * 2;
+	/* 2. Test sequence number within the new window(WS + 1) */
+	esn[1] = winsz + 1;
+	/* 3. Test sequence number less than the window BOTTOM */
+	esn[2] = winsz;
+	/* 4. Test sequence number in the middle of the window */
+	esn[3] = winsz + (winsz / 2);
+	/* 5. Test replay of the packet in the middle of the window */
+	esn[4] = winsz + (winsz / 2);
+
+	replayed_pkt[0] = false;
+	replayed_pkt[1] = false;
+	replayed_pkt[2] = true;
+	replayed_pkt[3] = false;
+	replayed_pkt[4] = true;
+
+	return test_ipsec_inline_pkt_replay(test_data, esn, replayed_pkt,
+			nb_pkts, false, winsz);
+}
+
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay1024(const void *test_data)
+{
+	return test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay(test_data, 1024);
+}
+
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay2048(const void *test_data)
+{
+	return test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay(test_data, 2048);
+}
+
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay4096(const void *test_data)
+{
+	return test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay(test_data, 4096);
+}
+
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay(const void *test_data, uint64_t winsz)
+{
+
+	uint32_t nb_pkts = 7;
+	bool replayed_pkt[7];
+	uint64_t esn[7];
+
+	/* Set the initial sequence number */
+	esn[0] = (uint64_t)(0xFFFFFFFF - winsz);
+	/* 1. Advance the TOP of the window to (1<<32 + WS/2) */
+	esn[1] = (uint64_t)((1ULL << 32) + (winsz / 2));
+	/* 2. Test sequence number within new window (1<<32 + WS/2 + 1) */
+	esn[2] = (uint64_t)((1ULL << 32) - (winsz / 2) + 1);
+	/* 3. Test with sequence number within window (1<<32 - 1) */
+	esn[3] = (uint64_t)((1ULL << 32) - 1);
+	/* 4. Test with sequence number within window (1<<32 - 1) */
+	esn[4] = (uint64_t)(1ULL << 32);
+	/* 5. Test with duplicate sequence number within
+	 * new window (1<<32 - 1)
+	 */
+	esn[5] = (uint64_t)((1ULL << 32) - 1);
+	/* 6. Test with duplicate sequence number within new window (1<<32) */
+	esn[6] = (uint64_t)(1ULL << 32);
+
+	replayed_pkt[0] = false;
+	replayed_pkt[1] = false;
+	replayed_pkt[2] = false;
+	replayed_pkt[3] = false;
+	replayed_pkt[4] = false;
+	replayed_pkt[5] = true;
+	replayed_pkt[6] = true;
+
+	return test_ipsec_inline_pkt_replay(test_data, esn, replayed_pkt, nb_pkts,
+				     true, winsz);
+}
+
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay1024(const void *test_data)
+{
+	return test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay(test_data, 1024);
+}
+
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay2048(const void *test_data)
+{
+	return test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay(test_data, 2048);
+}
+
+static int
+test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay4096(const void *test_data)
+{
+	return test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay(test_data, 4096);
+}
+
+
+
 static struct unit_test_suite inline_ipsec_testsuite  = {
 	.suite_name = "Inline IPsec Ethernet Device Unit Test Suite",
 	.setup = inline_ipsec_testsuite_setup,
@@ -1927,6 +2204,37 @@ static struct unit_test_suite inline_ipsec_testsuite  = {
 			test_ipsec_inline_proto_iv_gen),
 
 
+		TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA(
+			"Antireplay with window size 1024",
+			ut_setup_inline_ipsec, ut_teardown_inline_ipsec,
+			test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay1024,
+			&pkt_aes_128_gcm),
+		TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA(
+			"Antireplay with window size 2048",
+			ut_setup_inline_ipsec, ut_teardown_inline_ipsec,
+			test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay2048,
+			&pkt_aes_128_gcm),
+		TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA(
+			"Antireplay with window size 4096",
+			ut_setup_inline_ipsec, ut_teardown_inline_ipsec,
+			test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_antireplay4096,
+			&pkt_aes_128_gcm),
+		TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA(
+			"ESN and Antireplay with window size 1024",
+			ut_setup_inline_ipsec, ut_teardown_inline_ipsec,
+			test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay1024,
+			&pkt_aes_128_gcm),
+		TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA(
+			"ESN and Antireplay with window size 2048",
+			ut_setup_inline_ipsec, ut_teardown_inline_ipsec,
+			test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay2048,
+			&pkt_aes_128_gcm),
+		TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA(
+			"ESN and Antireplay with window size 4096",
+			ut_setup_inline_ipsec, ut_teardown_inline_ipsec,
+			test_ipsec_inline_proto_pkt_esn_antireplay4096,
+			&pkt_aes_128_gcm),
+
 		TEST_CASE_NAMED_WITH_DATA(
 			"IPv4 Reassembly with 2 fragments",
 			ut_setup_inline_ipsec, ut_teardown_inline_ipsec,
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-16 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 184+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-23 10:02 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2021-08-23 10:18 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-29 13:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-09-21 19:59     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-07  8:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-08 10:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Anoob Joseph
2021-09-13  6:56     ` Xu, Rosen
2021-09-13  7:22       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-14  5:14         ` Anoob Joseph
2021-09-08  6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] " Xu, Rosen
2021-09-08  6:36   ` Xu, Rosen
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 0/8] ethdev: introduce IP " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 1/8] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-11 16:03     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-22  7:38     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-01-30 16:53       ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 2/8] ethdev: add dev op for IP reassembly configuration Akhil Goyal
2022-01-11 16:09     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-11 18:54       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-12 10:22         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-12 10:32           ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-12 10:48             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-12 11:06               ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 13:31                 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 14:41                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 3/8] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-01-11 17:04     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-11 18:44       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-12 10:30         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-12 10:59           ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 22:29             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-13 13:18         ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 14:36           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-13 15:04             ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 4/8] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 5/8] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48     ` [PATCH v2 0/4] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48       ` [PATCH v2 1/4] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48       ` [PATCH v2 2/4] app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48       ` [PATCH v2 3/4] app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48       ` [PATCH v2 4/4] app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23       ` [PATCH v3 0/4] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23         ` [PATCH v3 1/4] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23         ` [PATCH v3 2/4] app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23         ` [PATCH v3 3/4] app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23         ` [PATCH v3 4/4] app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25         ` [PATCH v4 00/10] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 01/10] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 02/10] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 03/10] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 04/10] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 05/10] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 07/10] ethdev: add IPsec SA expiry event subtypes Akhil Goyal
2022-04-19  8:58             ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 10:14               ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-19 10:19                 ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-19 10:37                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 10:39                     ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-19 10:47                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 12:27                   ` Akhil Goyal
2022-04-19 15:41                     ` Ray Kinsella
2022-04-20 13:51                       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57             ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add and test IPsec SA expiry events Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57               ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: add IPsec SA expiry event subtypes Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 14:02                 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 14:02                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-27 18:44                   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57               ` [PATCH v5 2/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA soft expiry cases Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57               ` [PATCH v5 3/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA hard " Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07               ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Add and test IPsec SA expiry events Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07                 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] ethdev: add IPsec SA expiry event subtypes Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07                 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA soft expiry cases Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07                 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA hard " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 08/10] test/security: add inline IPsec SA soft " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 09/10] test/security: add inline IPsec SA hard " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 10/10] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-18  3:44             ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-18  3:55               ` Akhil Goyal
2022-04-25 12:38           ` [PATCH v4 00/10] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Poczatek, Jakub
2022-04-27 15:10           ` [PATCH v5 0/7] " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 1/7] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:44               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 2/7] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:44               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 3/7] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:45               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 4/7] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:45               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 5/7] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:46               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 6/7] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:46               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-28  5:25               ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 7/7] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:46               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:42             ` [PATCH v5 0/7] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-13  7:31             ` [PATCH v6 " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 1/7] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 2/7] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 3/7] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 4/7] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 5/7] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:32               ` [PATCH v6 6/7] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:32               ` [PATCH v6 7/7] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22               ` [PATCH v7 0/7] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  8:05                 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Anoob Joseph
2022-05-24  9:38                   ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 6/8] app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 7/8] app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 8/8] app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases Akhil Goyal
2022-01-06  9:51   ` [PATCH 0/8] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload David Marchand
2022-01-06  9:54     ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:45       ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-20 17:11         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ethdev: add dev op to set/get IP reassembly configuration Akhil Goyal
2022-01-22  8:17       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-01-30 16:30         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26     ` [PATCH v2 4/4] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59       ` [PATCH v3 1/4] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-01 14:11         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02 10:57           ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-02 14:05             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-30 17:59       ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ethdev: add dev op to set/get IP reassembly configuration Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59       ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-01 14:11         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02  9:13           ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59       ` [PATCH v3 4/4] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-01 14:12         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02  9:15           ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-02 14:04             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-01 14:10       ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02  9:05         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13       ` [PATCH v4 0/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13         ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:20           ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 13:53           ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 14:36             ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13         ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 13:58           ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 14:20             ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 14:56               ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 16:20                 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 16:41                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 17:17                     ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 17:23           ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-07 17:28             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 18:01               ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-07 18:28                 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 19:08                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-07 17:29             ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13         ` [PATCH v4 3/3] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08  9:01           ` David Marchand
2022-02-08  9:18             ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08  9:27               ` David Marchand
2022-02-08 10:45                 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 13:19                   ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 19:55                     ` David Marchand
2022-02-08 20:01                       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11         ` [PATCH v5 0/3] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11           ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11           ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11           ` [PATCH v5 3/3] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 22:20           ` [PATCH v6 0/3] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 22:20             ` [PATCH v6 1/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-10  8:54               ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 10:08               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-10 10:20                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 10:30                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-08 22:20             ` [PATCH v6 2/3] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-10  8:54               ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-08 22:20             ` [PATCH v6 3/3] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-10  8:54             ` [PATCH v6 0/3] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220416192530.173895-7-gakhil@marvell.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=vattunuru@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).