DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
	<jgrajcia@cisco.com>,
	"Phil Yang (Arm Technology China)" <Phil.Yang@arm.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	"Damjan Marion (damarion)" <damarion@cisco.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/memif: optimized with one-way barrier
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:59:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d816518-c899-70fb-4e18-1b6e1c8c1fef@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d11f6f6cb1440878a1f2d527576cca6@XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com>

On 10/9/2019 12:17 PM, Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at
Cisco) wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Phil Yang
>>>>> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 7:00 PM
>>>>> To: jgrajcia@cisco.com; dev@dpdk.org
>>>>> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; jerinj@marvell.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
>>>>> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; damarion@cisco.com; nd
>>>> <nd@arm.com>
>>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/memif: optimized with one-way
>>>>> barrier
>>>>>
>>>>> Using 'rte_mb' to synchronize the shared ring head/tail between
>>>>> producer and consumer will stall the pipeline and damage
>>>>> performance on the weak memory model platforms, such like aarch64.
>>>>> Meanwhile update the shared ring head and tail are observable and
>>>>> ordered
>>> between
>>>> CPUs on IA.
>>>>>
>>>>> Optimized this full barrier with the one-way barrier can improve
>>>>> the throughput. On aarch64 n1sdp server this patch make testpmd
>>> throughput
>>>>> boost 2.1%. On Intel E5-2640, testpmd got 3.98% performance gain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
>>>
>>> The patch is looking good, but 'MEMIF_VERSION_MAJOR' in memif.h needs
>>> to be set to 3 as ring pointers are no longer volatile.
>>
>> Updated in v2.
>> Thanks for your comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Phil
> 
> I jumped the gun with the version bump. The change doesn't break compatibility. I'm putting reviewed label on v1.
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com>
> 

Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-14  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26 11:00 Phil Yang
2019-08-26 11:03 ` Phil Yang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-08 11:05   ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-10-09  2:10     ` Phil Yang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-09 11:17       ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-10-14  8:59         ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-10-09  2:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang
2019-10-09 11:14   ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-10-10 14:04     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2d816518-c899-70fb-4e18-1b6e1c8c1fef@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Phil.Yang@arm.com \
    --cc=damarion@cisco.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=jgrajcia@cisco.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).