DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] net/mlx5: rte_flow_item_gtp restricted to GTPU
@ 2021-12-28 14:56 David Bouyeure
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Bouyeure @ 2021-12-28 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1008 bytes --]

Hi everybody,


I've implemented some flows offloading through rte_flow, and I'm just 
finding out that my GTPC packets aren't handled the same way as my GTPU 
ones by a Mellanox Connect-X6(FLEX_PARSER_PROFILE_ENABLE==3).

In others words, the GTP rules that I set are ignoring GTPC packets. The 
DPDK api doc doesn't say anything about any GTP-C/GTP-U distinction as 
far as I know, only that there's no way to set some filter against a 
GTPv2(GTP-C) header.

There's a reference to RTE_GTPU_UDP_PORT in 
dpdk.20.11.2/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c::flow_dv_translate_item_gtp(), 
and none to RTE_GTPC_UDP_PORT.

Do you confirm that mlx5 rte_flow implementation is definitely ignoring 
GTPC packets? And, if so, for which reason?


Thanks a lot.


Regards.


P.S: sorry for the previous nested message in '[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] 
net/iavf: support GTPU inner IPv4 for FDIR 
<http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/495fe401-7b39-462c-a698-9d5ee4ded7c5@fraudbuster.mobi/T/#m5f73a4d29de1fdb13663b77940110f2f98ab6085>'


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1489 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] net/mlx5: rte_flow_item_gtp restricted to GTPU
  2021-03-26 14:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/iavf: support GTPU inner IPv4 for FDIR Junfeng Guo
@ 2021-12-28 14:45     ` David Bouyeure
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Bouyeure @ 2021-12-28 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Hi everybody,


I've implemented some flows offloading through rte_flow, and I'm just 
finding out that my GTPC packets aren't handled the same way as my GTPU 
ones by a Mellanox Connect-X6(FLEX_PARSER_PROFILE_ENABLE==3).

In others words, the GTP rules that I set are ignoring GTPC packets. The 
DPDK api doc doesn't say anything about any GTP-C/GTP-U distinction as 
far as I know, only that there's no way to set some filter against a 
GTPv2(GTP-C) header.

There's a reference to RTE_GTPU_UDP_PORT in 
dpdk.20.11.2/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c::flow_dv_translate_item_gtp(), 
and none to RTE_GTPC_UDP_PORT.

Do you confirm that mlx5 rte_flow implementation is definitely ignoring 
GTPC packets? And, if so, for which reason?


Thanks a lot.


Regards.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-28 14:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-28 14:56 [dpdk-dev] net/mlx5: rte_flow_item_gtp restricted to GTPU David Bouyeure
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-26 10:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] net/iavf: support GTPU inner IPv4 for FDIR Junfeng Guo
2021-03-26 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] support GTPU inner IPv4/IPv6 for AVF FDIR Junfeng Guo
2021-03-26 14:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/iavf: support GTPU inner IPv4 for FDIR Junfeng Guo
2021-12-28 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] net/mlx5: rte_flow_item_gtp restricted to GTPU David Bouyeure

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).