DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Cc: chas3@att.com, p.oltarzewski@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] lacp rx/tx handlers fixes for bonding pmd
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:19:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63b2a77b-7b70-48f6-acdd-5b60dd7bf483@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df164a04-8f8a-0e13-b509-29c01d637078@intel.com>



On 6/27/19 4:08 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/10/2019 1:53 PM, David Marchand wrote:
>> Another series with focus on the fast/normal rx/tx handlers for 802.3ad.
>>
>> The first two patches make sure that the rx (resp. tx) fast and normal
>> handlers are equivalent.
>>
>> The third one will most likely have an impact on performance which I
>> tried to mitigate with the last one. However, I have no benchmark to
>> back those patches and I did not test those thoroughly, so they are
>> more like RFC patches but sending anyway.
>>
>>
> 
> Hi Chas,
> 
> Reminder of this patchset, it is waiting for a long time, if there is no
> objection I am for merging it.

These patches caused some additional regressions in our local tests. I 
haven't had time to investigate it though.

> 
> Thanks,
> ferruh
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-27 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-10 12:53 David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/bonding: fix oob access in LACP mode when sending many packets David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53   ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/bonding: fix LACP fast queue Rx handler David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53   ` David Marchand
2019-04-12 14:01   ` Chas Williams
2019-04-12 14:01     ` Chas Williams
2019-04-18  7:11     ` David Marchand
2019-04-18  7:11       ` David Marchand
2019-04-18 22:50       ` Chas Williams
2019-04-18 22:50         ` Chas Williams
2019-05-16  9:12         ` David Marchand
2019-05-16  9:12           ` David Marchand
2019-07-02 15:01           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-08-14  1:43             ` Chas Williams
2019-08-19  9:41               ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/bonding: fix unicast packets filtering when not in promisc David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53   ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/bonding: prefer allmulti to promisc for LACP David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53   ` David Marchand
2019-06-27  8:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] lacp rx/tx handlers fixes for bonding pmd Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-27 12:07   ` WILLIAMS, CHARLES J
2019-06-27 12:19   ` Chas Williams [this message]
2019-08-22 16:48 ` Yigit, Ferruh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63b2a77b-7b70-48f6-acdd-5b60dd7bf483@gmail.com \
    --to=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=chas3@att.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=p.oltarzewski@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).