DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: Kathleen Capella <kathleen.capella@arm.com>,
	"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>,
	"honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com" <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	"dharmik.thakkar@arm.com" <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/iavf: remove extra copy step in Rx bulk path
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:47:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ab1775b645f4a3298222387c8b39658@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220324221132.10055-1-kathleen.capella@arm.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Capella <kathleen.capella@arm.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 6:12 AM
> To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd@arm.com; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com;
> dharmik.thakkar@arm.com; Kathleen Capella <kathleen.capella@arm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/iavf: remove extra copy step in Rx bulk path
> 
> In the Rx bulk path, packets which are taken from the HW ring, are first
> copied to the stage data structure and then later copied from the stage to the
> rx_pkts array. For the number of packets requested immediately by the
> receiving function, this two-step process adds extra overhead that is not
> necessary.
> 
> Instead, put requested number of packets directly into the rx_pkts array and
> only stage excess packets. On N1SDP with 1 core/port, l3fwd saw up to 4%
> performance improvement. On x86, no difference in performance was
> observed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kathleen Capella <kathleen.capella@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>

Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

Thanks
Qi


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-20 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-24 22:11 Kathleen Capella
2022-03-28 17:31 ` Kathleen Capella
2022-04-20 12:47 ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6ab1775b645f4a3298222387c8b39658@intel.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kathleen.capella@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).