DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jiang, YuX" <yux.jiang@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Devlin, Michelle" <michelle.devlin@intel.com>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: RE: release candidate 21.11-rc4
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:47:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5530CF831E662101B76DB91BFE639@BN9PR11MB5530.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8yA1H_C=Of-p_rOuYDx5oSb+RQGZ7MMOozawWb0WCxubA@mail.gmail.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 2:38 AM
> To: announce@dpdk.org
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Subject: release candidate 21.11-rc4
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> A new DPDK release candidate is ready for testing:
>         https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tag/?id=v21.11-rc4
> 
> There are 46 new patches in this snapshot, for last critical fixes and some
> documentation updates.
> 
> Release notes:
>         https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.html
> 
> You may share some release validation results by replying to this message at
> dev@dpdk.org.
> 
> DPDK 21.11 should be released at the end of this week.
> 
> Please think about sharing your roadmap now for the next release.
> 
> Thank you everyone.
> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand
Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11-rc4 validation test is almost finished. No critical issue and no new issue is found.
# Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
* Build or compile:  
	*Build: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang/ICC version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora35, RHEL8.4, etc.
		- All test done.
		- Known bug: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=881: dpdk-next-net-mrvl branch still need rebase the fix.
	*Compile: cover the CFLAGES(O0/O1/O2/O3) with popular OS such as Ubuntu20.04 and RHEL8.4. 
		- All passed.
	* PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. 
		- All test done. No new issue is found.
		- One known bug https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=864: pmd_stacked_bonded/test_mode_backup_rx:after setup stacked bonded ports,start top level bond port. 
			- still verify failed based on dpdk21.11-rc4.
	* VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.		
		- All test done. No new issue is found.
		- Two known bugs. Intel dev is investigating them.
			[dpdk-21.11]vf_jumboframe/test_vf_jumbo_withjumbo: launch testpmd failed on driver ixgbe-5.13.4
			[dpdk-21.11]vf_vlan/add_pvid_vf: launch testpmd showing error log after vf vlan in kernel pf
	* PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Share code update/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
		- All test done. No new issue is found.
	* Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single core performance test, RFC2544 Zero packet loss performance test, etc.
		- All test done. No big performance drop.
	* Power and IPsec: 
		* Power: test scenarios including bi-direction/Telemetry/Empty Poll Lib/Priority Base Frequency, etc. 
 			- All passed.          
 		* IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
			- Most have done, all passed. 
# Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
	* Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE ESXI 7.0u3, etc.
		- All test done. No new issue is found. 
		- Known issue:
			- One about VMware ESXI 7.0U3: failed to start port. Intel Dev is under investigating.
	* Cryptodev: 
		*Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
			- All test done. No new issue is found.
		*Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance /Cryptodev Latency, etc.
			- All test done. No big performance drop.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-26 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-24 18:38 David Marchand
2021-11-25 16:08 ` Stokes, Ian
2021-11-26 10:09   ` David Marchand
     [not found] ` <PAXPR04MB94450A1D2DA550950C0E2FD6EF639@PAXPR04MB9445.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2021-11-26 10:10   ` [EXT] " David Marchand
2021-11-26 11:47 ` Jiang, YuX [this message]
2021-11-26 13:09   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BN9PR11MB5530CF831E662101B76DB91BFE639@BN9PR11MB5530.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yux.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=michelle.devlin@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).