DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>,
	 David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,  Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
	Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>,
	 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>,
	Jie Zhou <jizh@linux.microsoft.com>,
	konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru,
	 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] test/pmd_perf: handling of unknown connection speed
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 15:23:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACZ4nhu_8LNJNPXWt8aHuJ2eLt8zUWv0QkXiUHyxEKCZmNn7tg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6192851.a9HWlOh95j@thomas>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2957 bytes --]

On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 8:15 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 11/05/2022 18:33, Heinrich Schuchardt:
> > When running DPDK in QEMU it cannot determine the connection speed.
> > pmd_perf_autotest treats this as if the connection speed where
> > UNIT32_MAX Mbps:
> >
> >     RTE>>pmd_perf_autotest
> >     Start PMD RXTX cycles cost test.
> >     Allocated mbuf pool on socket 0
> >     CONFIG RXD=1024 TXD=1024
> >     Performance test runs on lcore 1 socket 0
> >     Port 0 Address:52:54:00:12:34:57
> >     Port 1 Address:52:54:00:12:34:58
> >     Checking link statuses...
> >     Port 0 Link up at Unknown FDX Autoneg
> >     Port 1 Link up at Unknown FDX Autoneg
> >     IPv4 pktlen 46
> >     UDP pktlen 26
> >     Generate 4096 packets @socket 0
> >     inject 2048 packet to port 0
> >     inject 2048 packet to port 1
> >     Total packets inject to prime ports = 4096
> >     Each port will do 6391320379464 packets per second
> >     Test will stop after at least 25565281517856 packets received
> >
> > This will not allow the test to terminate in a reasonable timespan.
> > Just assume 10 Gbps in this case instead:
> >
> >     ...
> >     Test will stop after at least 59523808 packets received
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test/test_pmd_perf.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_pmd_perf.c b/app/test/test_pmd_perf.c
> > index 25611bfe9b..ee08c8aade 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_pmd_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_pmd_perf.c
> > @@ -486,10 +486,17 @@ main_loop(__rte_unused void *args)
> >       }
> >       printf("Total packets inject to prime ports = %u\n", idx);
> >
> > -     packets_per_second = (link_mbps * 1000 * 1000) /
> > -             ((PACKET_SIZE + FRAME_GAP + MAC_PREAMBLE) * CHAR_BIT);
> > -     printf("Each port will do %"PRIu64" packets per second\n",
> > -            packets_per_second);
> > +     if (link_mbps != RTE_ETH_SPEED_NUM_UNKNOWN) {
> > +             packets_per_second = (link_mbps * 1000 * 1000) /
> > +                     ((PACKET_SIZE + FRAME_GAP + MAC_PREAMBLE) * CHAR_BIT);
> > +             printf("Each port will do %"PRIu64" packets per second\n",
> > +                    packets_per_second);
> > +             total_packets = RTE_TEST_DURATION * conf->nb_ports * packets_per_second;
>
> This is redundant with below.
>
> > +     } else {
> > +             /* We don't know the speed. Pretend it is 10G */
> > +             packets_per_second = ((uint64_t)RTE_ETH_SPEED_NUM_10G * 1000 * 1000) /
> > +                     ((PACKET_SIZE + FRAME_GAP + MAC_PREAMBLE) * CHAR_BIT);
> > +     }
> >
> >       total_packets = RTE_TEST_DURATION * conf->nb_ports * packets_per_second;
>
> Why not just inserting this:
>
> if (link_mbps == RTE_ETH_SPEED_NUM_UNKNOWN)
>         link_mbps = RTE_ETH_SPEED_NUM_10G;
+1
I think this is better.

>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4218 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-26 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 16:33 Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-06-26 15:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-06-26 22:23   ` Ajit Khaparde [this message]
2022-06-27  7:18   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-06-27  7:54     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACZ4nhu_8LNJNPXWt8aHuJ2eLt8zUWv0QkXiUHyxEKCZmNn7tg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=jizh@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=rosen.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).