DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
	 Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: remove duplicated offload display
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:40:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADyeNEAm-Xgzt4goXoddAFhmas41Oy5ULpAHFNkDLSZZ60yquA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210205142650.1106807-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1017 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:27 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>
> "show port cap all|<port_id>" was to display offload configuration of
> port(s).
>
> But later two other commands added to show same information in more
> accurate way:
>  show port (port_id) rx_offload configuration
>  show port (port_id) tx_offload configuration
>
> These new commands can both show port and queue level configuration,
> also with their capabilities counterparts easier to see offload
> capability and configuration of the port in similar syntax.
>
> So the functionality is duplicated and removing this version, to favor
> the new commands.
>
> Another problem with this command is it requires each new offload to be
> added into the function to display them, and there were missing offloads
> that are not displayed, this requirement for sure will create gaps by
> time as new offloads added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-05 14:26 Ferruh Yigit
2021-02-05 16:40 ` Lance Richardson [this message]
2021-02-07  1:47 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-02-07  1:58 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-02-24 12:29   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CADyeNEAm-Xgzt4goXoddAFhmas41Oy5ULpAHFNkDLSZZ60yquA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lance.richardson@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).