From: David Miller <dmiller423@gmail.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Mathew S Thoennes <tardis@us.ibm.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
Yuying Zhang <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>,
Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>, Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>,
Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
Wenjun Wu <wenjun1.wu@intel.com>,
Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com>,
Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for IBM Z s390x
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 10:48:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEgyohWL7HXTpe+_npgf5Xqp-h29fgZGR6MDiV+rump7JUsQDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEgyohUsSJMg3r6VPQnU1RkjUQPMhShHMR64PwadLdSuTpNSpQ@mail.gmail.com>
It looks like this is still from v2, v3 (fixes the build issue,
missing operator) was submit the same day..
The abi-test failure referenced is present on v3 (which the bot has
only accepted today).
Patch v4 will be split as requested.
Thanks.
- David Miller
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 10:34 AM David Miller <dmiller423@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm happy to split it, I will resubmit when these changes are made.
> I was planning to spend some time to figure out why the CI abi test is
> failing / it had previously passed all tests locally.
> The (one) long term maintainer will be Mathew S Thoennes <tardis@us.ibm.com>.
> I will relay your concerns about CI and have him speak with David Christensen.
>
> - David Miller
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 10:25 AM David Marchand
> <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello David,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 3:35 AM David Miller <dmiller423@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Minimal changes to drivers and app to support the IBM s390x.
> >
> > This seems a bit more than "minimal changes" :-).
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Miller <dmiller423@gmail.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Mathew S Thoennes <tardis@us.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > app/test-acl/main.c | 4 +
> > > app/test/test_acl.c | 1 +
> > > app/test/test_atomic.c | 7 +-
> > > app/test/test_cmdline_ipaddr.c | 12 +-
> > > app/test/test_cmdline_num.c | 110 ++++
> > > app/test/test_hash_functions.c | 29 +
> > > app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h | 14 +
> > > buildtools/pmdinfogen.py | 11 +-
> > > config/meson.build | 2 +
> > > config/s390x/meson.build | 51 ++
> > > config/s390x/s390x_linux_clang_ubuntu | 19 +
> > > doc/guides/nics/features/i40e.ini | 1 +
> > > drivers/common/mlx5/mlx5_common.h | 9 +
> > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_s390x.c | 630 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/net/i40e/meson.build | 2 +
> > > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 8 +-
> > > drivers/net/memif/rte_eth_memif.h | 2 +
> > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rx.c | 24 +-
> > > drivers/net/octeontx/base/octeontx_pki_var.h | 6 +
> > > examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 8 +
> > > examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_s390x.h | 137 ++++
> > > examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_s390x.h | 261 ++++++++
> > > lib/acl/acl_bld.c | 3 +
> > > lib/acl/acl_gen.c | 9 +
> > > lib/acl/acl_run_scalar.c | 8 +
> > > lib/acl/rte_acl.c | 27 +
> > > lib/acl/rte_acl.h | 5 +-
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/meson.build | 16 +
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_atomic.h | 44 ++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_byteorder.h | 43 ++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_cpuflags.h | 41 ++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_cycles.h | 44 ++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_io.h | 184 ++++++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_mcslock.h | 18 +
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_memcpy.h | 55 ++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_pause.h | 22 +
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_power_intrinsics.h | 20 +
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_prefetch.h | 46 ++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_rwlock.h | 42 ++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_spinlock.h | 85 +++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_ticketlock.h | 18 +
> > > lib/eal/s390x/include/rte_vect.h | 35 ++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/meson.build | 16 +
> > > lib/eal/s390x/rte_cpuflags.c | 91 +++
> > > lib/eal/s390x/rte_cycles.c | 11 +
> > > lib/eal/s390x/rte_hypervisor.c | 11 +
> > > lib/eal/s390x/rte_power_intrinsics.c | 51 ++
> > > lib/hash/rte_fbk_hash.h | 7 +
> > > lib/lpm/meson.build | 1 +
> > > lib/lpm/rte_lpm.h | 2 +
> > > lib/lpm/rte_lpm6.c | 18 +
> > > lib/lpm/rte_lpm_s390x.h | 130 ++++
> > > meson.build | 2 +
> > > 53 files changed, 2439 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > - This is too big to review.
> > Please split this patch separating the really minimum support (getting
> > EAL and main libraries to build, disabling the rest that is "broken"
> > for s390x) then adding more components support in later patches.
> >
> > RISC V and LoongArch "recent" additions are good examples.
> > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=23380&state=%2A&archive=both
> > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=24969&state=%2A&archive=both
> >
> > - We need one maintainer for this new architecture.
> >
> > - You'll notice that the DPDK CI reported issues, please fix them.
> >
> > - What are the plans in terms of CI? We need some compilation testing
> > and ideally some regular runtime testing.
> > Maybe you can reach out to IBM PPC DPDK guys, like David Christensen,
> > to see what they are doing.
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Marchand
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-02 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <[PATCH] Add support for IBM Z s390x>
2023-07-26 1:35 ` David Miller
2023-08-02 15:25 ` David Marchand
2023-08-02 15:34 ` David Miller
2023-08-02 15:48 ` David Miller [this message]
2023-08-14 13:03 ` Mathew S Thoennes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEgyohWL7HXTpe+_npgf5Xqp-h29fgZGR6MDiV+rump7JUsQDQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmiller423@gmail.com \
--cc=Yuying.Zhang@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=jgrajcia@cisco.com \
--cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tardis@us.ibm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
--cc=wenjun1.wu@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).