DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH 08/40] test/crypto: separate key exchange operation enum
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 07:18:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484365A0277D43B620E63BED8D39@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220520055445.40063-9-arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>

> - Key exchange is now separate enum.
> This commit reflects changes to the asymmetric crypto API
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
> ---

Individual patches must compile.
There are multiple patches which needs to be combined.
6,7,8 should be a single patch or else compilation will be broken

2,3 should also be combined.


>  app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
> index 62d710b0a0..0098b6bf65 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ test_one_case(const void *test_case, int sessionless)
>  		printf("  %u) TestCase %s %s\n", test_index++,
>  			tc.modex.description, test_msg);
>  	} else {
> -		for (i = 0; i <=
> RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_OP_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE; i++) {
> +		for (i = 0; i <=
> RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE; i++) {
>  			if (tc.modex.xform_type ==
> RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_RSA) {
>  				if (tc.rsa_data.op_type_flags & (1 << i)) {
>  					if (tc.rsa_data.key_exp) {
> @@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ static inline void print_asym_capa(
>  			rte_crypto_asym_xform_strings[capa->xform_type]);
>  	printf("operation supported -");
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i <= RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_OP_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE;
> i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i <= RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE; i++)
> {
>  		/* check supported operations */
>  		if (rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_optype(capa,
> i))
>  			printf(" %s",
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ test_dh_gen_shared_sec(struct
> rte_crypto_asym_xform *xfrm)
>  	asym_op = op->asym;
> 
>  	/* Setup a xform and op to generate private key only */
> -	xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_OP_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE;
> +	xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE;
>  	xform.next = NULL;
>  	asym_op->dh.priv_key.data = dh_test_params.priv_key.data;
>  	asym_op->dh.priv_key.length = dh_test_params.priv_key.length;
> @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ test_dh_gen_priv_key(struct rte_crypto_asym_xform
> *xfrm)
>  	asym_op = op->asym;
> 
>  	/* Setup a xform and op to generate private key only */
> -	xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_OP_PRIVATE_KEY_GENERATE;
> +	xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PRIVATE_KEY_GENERATE;
>  	xform.next = NULL;
>  	asym_op->dh.priv_key.data = output;
>  	asym_op->dh.priv_key.length = sizeof(output);
> @@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ test_dh_gen_pub_key(struct rte_crypto_asym_xform
> *xfrm)
>  	 * using test private key
>  	 *
>  	 */
> -	xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_OP_PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATE;
> +	xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATE;
>  	xform.next = NULL;
> 
>  	asym_op->dh.pub_key.data = output;
> @@ -1317,9 +1317,10 @@ test_dh_gen_kp(struct rte_crypto_asym_xform
> *xfrm)
>  	/* Setup a xform chain to generate
>  	 * private key first followed by
>  	 * public key
> -	 */xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_OP_PRIVATE_KEY_GENERATE;
> +	 */
> +	xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PRIVATE_KEY_GENERATE;
>  	pub_key_xform.xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DH;
> -	pub_key_xform.dh.type =
> RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_OP_PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATE;
> +	pub_key_xform.dh.type =
> RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATE;
>  	xform.next = &pub_key_xform;
> 
>  	asym_op->dh.pub_key.data = out_pub_key;
> --
> 2.13.6


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-20  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-20  5:54 [PATCH 00/40] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 01/40] cryptodev: redefine ec group enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 02/40] cryptodev: remove list end enumerators Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:19   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 03/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 04/40] cryptodev: reduce number of comments in asym xform Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 10:59   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 17:37     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  5:44       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 05/40] test/crypto: removed asym xform none Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 06/40] cryptodev: separate key exchange operation enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 11:45   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 07/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 08/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:18   ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 09/40] cryptodev: remove unnecessary zero assignement Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:13   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 10/40] cryptodev: remove comment about using ephemeral key in dsa Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 11/40] cryptodev: remove asym crypto next xform Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:22   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 11:12   ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:47     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  6:06       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25  6:36         ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  7:05           ` Anoob Joseph
2022-05-27  6:30             ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-27  6:40               ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-27  6:55                 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-27  7:27                   ` Anoob Joseph
2022-05-27  7:47                     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 12/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 13/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:24   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  7:38     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 14/40] app/test-crypto-perf: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 15/40] app/test-eventdev: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:25   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 16/40] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 11:52   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 17/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 18/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 19/40] cryptodev: changed order of dh fields Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 20/40] cryptodev: add elliptic curve diffie hellman Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:08   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:52     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-24 14:55       ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  6:02         ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25  6:33           ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 21/40] cryptodev: add public key verify option Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:12   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:59     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  6:00       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25  6:30         ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 22/40] cryptodev: move RSA padding into separate struct Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 23/40] crypto/qat: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 24/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 25/40] crypto/octeontx: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 26/40] crypto/cnxk: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 27/40] common/cpt: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 28/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 29/40] cryptodev: add salt length and optional label Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:30   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 15:14     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  5:57       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 30/40] cryptodev: reduce rsa struct to only necessary fields Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:52   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 15:33     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  5:48       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 31/40] crypto/qat: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 32/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 33/40] crypto/octeontx: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 34/40] crypto/cnxk: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 35/40] common/cpt: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 36/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 37/40] cryptodev: add asym op flags Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 12:07   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 38/40] cryptodev: clarify usage of private key in dh Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:56   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:30     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  6:09       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25  6:37         ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 39/40] crypto/openssl: generate dh private key Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 40/40] test/crypto: added test for dh priv key generation Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:30 ` [EXT] [PATCH 00/40] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  7:37   ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484365A0277D43B620E63BED8D39@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).