DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 08/14] cryptodev: add public key verify option
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 11:46:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB50131117AF1651F7789D532A9FD99@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR18MB4484772789C077A7E2B30EBCD8D99@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2022 1:34 PM
> To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 08/14] cryptodev: add public key verify option
> 
> > - Added key exchange public key verify option.
> > For some elliptic curves public point in DH exchange needs to be
> > checked, if it lays on the curve.
> > Modular exponentiation needs certain checks as well, though
> > mathematically much easier.
> > This commit adds verify option to asym_op operations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h | 9 ++++++---
> >  lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c   | 3 ++-
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> > b/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h index 0dab7c0593..3eafaecbbe 100644
> > --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> > +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> > @@ -141,8 +141,10 @@ enum rte_crypto_asym_ke_type {
> >  	/**< Private Key generation operation */
> >  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATE,
> >  	/**< Public Key generation operation */
> > -	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE
> > +	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE,
> >  	/**< Shared Secret compute operation */
> > +	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_EC_PUBLIC_KEY_VERIFY,
> > +	/**< Public Key Verification */
> 
> If this is not for DH and only for ECDH, then specify this in comments also.
> But IMO, it will be OK to use RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PUB_KEY_VERIFY.
> If it is not valid to use it for DH, we can mention in comments.
+1
> 
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -434,8 +436,9 @@ struct rte_crypto_ecdh_op_param {
> >  	 * Output - generated public key, when xform type is
> >  	 * RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATE.
> >  	 *
> > -	 * Input - peer's public key, when xform type is
> > -	 * RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE.
> > +	 * Input - peer's public key, when xform type is one of:
> > +	 * RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE,
> > +	 * RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_EC_PUBLIC_KEY_VERIFY.
> >  	 */
> >  	struct rte_crypto_ec_point shared_secret;
> >  	/**<
> > diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c index af58f49d07..57ee6b3f07 100644
> > --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > @@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ const char *rte_crypto_asym_op_strings[] = {
> > const char *rte_crypto_asym_ke_strings[] = {
> >  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PRIVATE_KEY_GENERATE] =
> "priv_key_generate",
> >  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATE] =
> "pub_key_generate",
> > -	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE] =
> > "sharedsecret_compute"
> > +	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE] =
> > "sharedsecret_compute",
> > +	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_EC_PUBLIC_KEY_VERIFY] =
> > "pub_ec_key_verify"
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > --
> > 2.13.6


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-25 15:53 [PATCH v2 00/14] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Arek Kusztal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] cryptodev: redefine ec group enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26  9:40   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] cryptodev: reduce number of comments in asym xform Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26  9:52   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 10:03     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] cryptodev: separate key exchange operation enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 10:57   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 11:06     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-26 11:09       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] cryptodev: remove comment about using ephemeral key in dsa Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:02   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] cryptodev: clarify usage of private key in dh Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:04   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:23   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] cryptodev: add elliptic curve diffie hellman Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:29   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 11:44     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] cryptodev: add public key verify option Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:34   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 11:46     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX [this message]
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] cryptodev: add asym op flags Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:46   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] cryptodev: clarify usage of rsa padding hash Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:56   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] cryptodev: move RSA padding into separate struct Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 12:04   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 12:14     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-26 12:19       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 12:35         ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-26 12:41           ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] cryptodev: clarify rsa verify with none padding Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 12:06   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 12:15     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] cryptodev: add salt length and optional label Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 12:08   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] cryptodev: add asym algorithms capabilities Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 12:54   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 14:19     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-26 15:00       ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB50131117AF1651F7789D532A9FD99@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).