From: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] 回复: [PATCH v5 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 11:54:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VE1PR08MB567751C97487876B7D8CF1C2C83D0@VE1PR08MB5677.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB3301EF78BC9A9AB7E375B4F99A3E0@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi, Konstantin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> 发送时间: 2020年9月18日 0:26
> 收件人: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
> 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>
> 主题: RE: [PATCH v5 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro
>
>
>
> > Add more parameters into the macro TEST_RING_VERIFY and expand the
> > scope of application for it. Then replace all ring APIs check with
> > TEST_RING_VERIFY to facilitate debugging.
> >
> > Furthermore, correct a spelling mistakes of the macro
> > TEST_RING_FULL_EMTPY_ITER.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_ring.c | 266
> > ++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_ring.c b/app/test/test_ring.c index
> > fb46614f8..605b620ce 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_ring.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_ring.c
> > @@ -46,15 +46,25 @@
> > #define RING_SIZE 4096
> > #define MAX_BULK 32
> >
> > -#define TEST_RING_VERIFY(exp)
> \
> > +/*
> > + * Validate the return value of test cases and print details of the
> > + * ring if validation fails
> > + *
> > + * @param exp
> > + * Expression to validate return value.
> > + * @param r
> > + * A pointer to the ring structure.
> > + */
> > +#define TEST_RING_VERIFY(exp, r) do {
> \
> > if (!(exp)) { \
> > printf("error at %s:%d\tcondition " #exp " failed\n", \
> > __func__, __LINE__); \
> > - rte_ring_dump(stdout, r); \
> > - return -1; \
> > - }
> > + rte_ring_dump(stdout, (r)); \
> > + goto fail; \
> > + } \
> > +} while (0)
>
> LGTM, just one suggestion for the macro above:
> Instead of arrange the whole code with the same label, why not to simply add
> control transfer statement as extra parameter to the macro:
>
> #define TEST_RING_VERIFY(exp, r, errst) do {
> \
> if (!(exp)) { \
> printf("error at %s:%d\tcondition " #exp " failed\n", \
> __func__, __LINE__); \
> rte_ring_dump(stdout, r); \
> errst; \
> }
> \
> } while (0)
>
> Ans then just:
> TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_free_count(r) == 0, r, return -1); or
> TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_free_count(r) == 0, r, goto fail); or whatever is
> appropriate.
>
> With that said:
> Series acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>
Thanks for your advice, the new version with this change has just been updated.
> >
> > -#define TEST_RING_FULL_EMTPY_ITER 8
> > +#define TEST_RING_FULL_EMPTY_ITER 8
> >
> > static const int esize[] = {-1, 4, 8, 16, 20};
> >
> > @@ -316,7 +326,7 @@ test_ring_negative_tests(void)
> > RING_SIZE + 1, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > if (rp != NULL) {
> > printf("Test failed to detect invalid element size\n");
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> >
> >
> > @@ -326,7 +336,7 @@ test_ring_negative_tests(void)
> > RING_SIZE + 1, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > if (rp != NULL) {
> > printf("Test failed to detect odd count\n");
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> >
> > /* Test if ring size is exceeding the limit */ @@ -334,14
> +344,14
> > @@ test_ring_negative_tests(void)
> > RTE_RING_SZ_MASK + 1,
> SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > if (rp != NULL) {
> > printf("Test failed to detect limits\n");
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> >
> > /* Tests if lookup returns NULL on non-existing ring */
> > rp = rte_ring_lookup("ring_not_found");
> > if (rp != NULL && rte_errno != ENOENT) {
> > printf("Test failed to detect NULL ring lookup\n");
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> >
> > /* Test to if a non-power of 2 count causes the create @@ -
> 350,23
> > +360,19 @@ test_ring_negative_tests(void)
> > rp = test_ring_create("test_ring_count", esize[i], 4097,
> > SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > if (rp != NULL)
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> >
> > rp = test_ring_create("test_ring_negative", esize[i], RING_SIZE,
> > SOCKET_ID_ANY,
> > RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
> > if (rp == NULL) {
> > printf("test_ring_negative fail to create ring\n");
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> >
> > - if (rte_ring_lookup("test_ring_negative") != rp)
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_lookup("test_ring_negative") ==
> rp, rp);
> >
> > - if (rte_ring_empty(rp) != 1) {
> > - printf("test_ring_nagative ring is not empty but it
> should be\n");
> > - goto test_fail;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_empty(rp) == 1, rp);
> >
> > /* Tests if it would always fail to create ring with an used
> > * ring name.
> > @@ -374,7 +380,7 @@ test_ring_negative_tests(void)
> > rt = test_ring_create("test_ring_negative", esize[i], RING_SIZE,
> > SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > if (rt != NULL)
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> >
> > rte_ring_free(rp);
> > rp = NULL;
> > @@ -382,7 +388,7 @@ test_ring_negative_tests(void)
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > -test_fail:
> > +fail:
> >
> > rte_ring_free(rp);
> > return -1;
> > @@ -426,44 +432,45 @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests1(unsigned int
> > test_idx)
> >
> > printf("Random full/empty test\n");
> >
> > - for (j = 0; j != TEST_RING_FULL_EMTPY_ITER; j++) {
> > + for (j = 0; j != TEST_RING_FULL_EMPTY_ITER; j++) {
> > /* random shift in the ring */
> > rand = RTE_MAX(rte_rand() % RING_SIZE, 1UL);
> > printf("%s: iteration %u, random shift: %u;\n",
> > __func__, i, rand);
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i], rand,
> > test_idx);
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret != 0);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret != 0, r);
> >
> > ret = test_ring_deq_impl(r, cur_dst, esize[i], rand,
> > test_idx);
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == rand);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == rand, r);
> >
> > /* fill the ring */
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i], rsz,
> > test_idx);
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret != 0);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret != 0, r);
> >
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_free_count(r) == 0);
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(rsz == rte_ring_count(r));
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_full(r));
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_empty(r) == 0);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_free_count(r) == 0, r);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rsz == rte_ring_count(r), r);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_full(r), r);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_empty(r) == 0, r);
> >
> > /* empty the ring */
> > ret = test_ring_deq_impl(r, cur_dst, esize[i], rsz,
> > test_idx);
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == (int)rsz);
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(rsz == rte_ring_free_count(r));
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_count(r) == 0);
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_full(r) == 0);
> > - TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_empty(r));
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == (int)rsz, r);
> > +
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rsz == rte_ring_free_count(r), r);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_count(r) == 0, r);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_full(r) == 0, r);
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_empty(r), r);
> >
> > /* check data */
> > temp_sz = rsz * sizeof(void *);
> > if (esize[i] != -1)
> > temp_sz = rsz * esize[i];
> > TEST_RING_VERIFY(test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst,
> > - temp_sz) == 0);
> > + temp_sz) == 0, r);
> > }
> >
> > /* Free memory before test completed */ @@ -520,45 +527,39
> @@
> > test_ring_burst_bulk_tests2(unsigned int test_idx)
> >
> > printf("enqueue 1 obj\n");
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i], 1, test_idx);
> > - if (ret != 1)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 1, r);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
> >
> > printf("enqueue 2 objs\n");
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i], 2, test_idx);
> > - if (ret != 2)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 2, r);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 2);
> >
> > printf("enqueue MAX_BULK objs\n");
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i], MAX_BULK,
> > test_idx);
> > - if (ret != MAX_BULK)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == MAX_BULK, r);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], MAX_BULK);
> >
> > printf("dequeue 1 obj\n");
> > ret = test_ring_deq_impl(r, cur_dst, esize[i], 1, test_idx);
> > - if (ret != 1)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 1, r);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 1);
> >
> > printf("dequeue 2 objs\n");
> > ret = test_ring_deq_impl(r, cur_dst, esize[i], 2, test_idx);
> > - if (ret != 2)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 2, r);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 2);
> >
> > printf("dequeue MAX_BULK objs\n");
> > ret = test_ring_deq_impl(r, cur_dst, esize[i], MAX_BULK,
> > test_idx);
> > - if (ret != MAX_BULK)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == MAX_BULK, r);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], MAX_BULK);
> >
> > /* check data */
> > - if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst,
> > + RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)) == 0, r);
> >
> > /* Free memory before test completed */
> > rte_ring_free(r);
> > @@ -615,22 +616,20 @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests3(unsigned int test_idx)
> > for (j = 0; j < RING_SIZE / MAX_BULK; j++) {
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i],
> MAX_BULK,
> > test_idx);
> > - if (ret != MAX_BULK)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == MAX_BULK, r);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i],
> > MAX_BULK);
> >
> > ret = test_ring_deq_impl(r, cur_dst, esize[i],
> MAX_BULK,
> > test_idx);
> > - if (ret != MAX_BULK)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == MAX_BULK, r);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i],
> > MAX_BULK);
> > }
> >
> > /* check data */
> > - if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst,
> > + RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)) == 0, r);
> >
> > /* Free memory before test completed */
> > rte_ring_free(r);
> > @@ -690,16 +689,14 @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests4(unsigned int test_idx)
> > for (j = 0; j < (RING_SIZE/MAX_BULK - 1); j++) {
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i],
> MAX_BULK,
> > test_idx);
> > - if (ret != MAX_BULK)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == MAX_BULK, r);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i],
> > MAX_BULK);
> > }
> >
> > printf("Enqueue 2 objects, free entries = MAX_BULK - 2\n");
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i], 2, test_idx);
> > - if (ret != 2)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 2, r);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 2);
> >
> > printf("Enqueue the remaining entries = MAX_BULK - 3\n");
> @@
> > -711,34 +708,29 @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests4(unsigned int test_idx)
> > /* Always one free entry left */
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i], num_elems,
> > test_idx);
> > - if (ret != MAX_BULK - 3)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == MAX_BULK - 3, r);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], MAX_BULK - 3);
> >
> > printf("Test if ring is full\n");
> > - if (rte_ring_full(r) != 1)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_full(r) == 1, r);
> >
> > printf("Test enqueue for a full entry\n");
> > ret = test_ring_enq_impl(r, cur_src, esize[i], MAX_BULK,
> > test_idx);
> > - if (ret != 0)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 0, r);
> >
> > printf("Test dequeue without enough objects\n");
> > for (j = 0; j < RING_SIZE / MAX_BULK - 1; j++) {
> > ret = test_ring_deq_impl(r, cur_dst, esize[i],
> MAX_BULK,
> > test_idx);
> > - if (ret != MAX_BULK)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == MAX_BULK, r);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i],
> > MAX_BULK);
> > }
> >
> > /* Available memory space for the exact MAX_BULK entries */
> > ret = test_ring_deq_impl(r, cur_dst, esize[i], 2, test_idx);
> > - if (ret != 2)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 2, r);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 2);
> >
> > /* Bulk APIs enqueue exact number of elements */ @@ -
> 748,18 +740,16
> > @@ test_ring_burst_bulk_tests4(unsigned int test_idx)
> > num_elems = MAX_BULK;
> > ret = test_ring_deq_impl(r, cur_dst, esize[i], num_elems,
> > test_idx);
> > - if (ret != MAX_BULK - 3)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == MAX_BULK - 3, r);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], MAX_BULK - 3);
> >
> > printf("Test if ring is empty\n");
> > /* Check if ring is empty */
> > - if (rte_ring_empty(r) != 1)
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_empty(r) == 1, r);
> >
> > /* check data */
> > - if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
> > - goto fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst,
> > + RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)) == 0, r);
> >
> > /* Free memory before test completed */
> > rte_ring_free(r);
> > @@ -795,14 +785,14 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> > RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
> > if (rp == NULL) {
> > printf("%s: failed to create ring\n", __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> >
> > /* alloc dummy object pointers */
> > src = test_ring_calloc(RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> > if (src == NULL) {
> > printf("%s: failed to alloc src memory\n", __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> > test_ring_mem_init(src, RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> > cur_src = src;
> > @@ -811,20 +801,13 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> > dst = test_ring_calloc(RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> > if (dst == NULL) {
> > printf("%s: failed to alloc dst memory\n", __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> > cur_dst = dst;
> >
> > - if (rte_ring_lookup("test_ring_basic_ex") != rp) {
> > - printf("%s: failed to find ring\n", __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_lookup("test_ring_basic_ex") ==
> rp, rp);
> >
> > - if (rte_ring_empty(rp) != 1) {
> > - printf("%s: ring is not empty but it should be\n",
> > - __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_empty(rp) == 1, rp);
> >
> > printf("%u ring entries are now free\n",
> > rte_ring_free_count(rp));
> > @@ -832,40 +815,24 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> > for (j = 0; j < RING_SIZE - 1; j++) {
> > ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - printf("%s: rte_ring_enqueue fails\n",
> > - __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 0, rp);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
> > }
> >
> > - if (rte_ring_full(rp) != 1) {
> > - printf("%s: ring is not full but it should be\n",
> > - __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_full(rp) == 1, rp);
> >
> > for (j = 0; j < RING_SIZE - 1; j++) {
> > ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, cur_dst, esize[i], 1,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - printf("%s: rte_ring_dequeue fails\n",
> > - __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 0, rp);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 1);
> > }
> >
> > - if (rte_ring_empty(rp) != 1) {
> > - printf("%s: ring is not empty but it should be\n",
> > - __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_empty(rp) == 1, rp);
> >
> > /* check data */
> > - if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
> > - goto fail_test;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst,
> > + RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)) == 0, rp);
> >
> > /* Following tests use the configured flags to decide
> > * SP/SC or MP/MC.
> > @@ -880,40 +847,28 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> > /* Covering the ring burst operation */
> > ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, cur_src, esize[i], 2,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BURST);
> > - if (ret != 2) {
> > - printf("%s: rte_ring_enqueue_burst fails\n", __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 2, rp);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 2);
> >
> > ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, cur_dst, esize[i], 2,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BURST);
> > - if (ret != 2) {
> > - printf("%s: rte_ring_dequeue_burst fails\n", __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 2, rp);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 2);
> >
> > /* Covering the ring bulk operation */
> > ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, cur_src, esize[i], 2,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BULK);
> > - if (ret != 2) {
> > - printf("%s: rte_ring_enqueue_bulk fails\n", __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 2, rp);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 2);
> >
> > ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, cur_dst, esize[i], 2,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BULK);
> > - if (ret != 2) {
> > - printf("%s: rte_ring_dequeue_bulk fails\n", __func__);
> > - goto fail_test;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 2, rp);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 2);
> >
> > /* check data */
> > - if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
> > - goto fail_test;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst,
> > + RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)) == 0, rp);
> >
> > rte_ring_free(rp);
> > rte_free(src);
> > @@ -925,7 +880,7 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > -fail_test:
> > +fail:
> > rte_ring_free(rp);
> > rte_free(src);
> > rte_free(dst);
> > @@ -955,7 +910,7 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> > RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
> > if (std_r == NULL) {
> > printf("%s: error, can't create std ring\n", __func__);
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> > exact_sz_r = test_ring_create("exact sz", esize[i], ring_sz,
> > rte_socket_id(),
> > @@ -964,7 +919,7 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> > if (exact_sz_r == NULL) {
> > printf("%s: error, can't create exact size ring\n",
> > __func__);
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> > }
> >
> > /* alloc object pointers. Allocate one extra object @@ -972,14
> > +927,14 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> > */
> > src_orig = test_ring_calloc(17, esize[i]);
> > if (src_orig == NULL)
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> > test_ring_mem_init(src_orig, 17, esize[i]);
> > src = (void **)((uintptr_t)src_orig + 1);
> > cur_src = src;
> >
> > dst_orig = test_ring_calloc(17, esize[i]);
> > if (dst_orig == NULL)
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + goto fail;
> > dst = (void **)((uintptr_t)dst_orig + 1);
> > cur_dst = dst;
> >
> > @@ -987,13 +942,9 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> > * Check that the exact size ring is bigger than the
> > * standard ring
> > */
> > - if (rte_ring_get_size(std_r) >= rte_ring_get_size(exact_sz_r)) {
> > - printf("%s: error, std ring (size: %u) is not smaller than
> exact size one (size %u)\n",
> > - __func__,
> > - rte_ring_get_size(std_r),
> > - rte_ring_get_size(exact_sz_r));
> > - goto test_fail;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_get_size(std_r) <=
> > + rte_ring_get_size(exact_sz_r), std_r);
> > +
> > /*
> > * check that the exact_sz_ring can hold one more element
> > * than the standard ring. (16 vs 15 elements) @@ -1001,53
> +952,34
> > @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> > for (j = 0; j < ring_sz - 1; j++) {
> > ret = test_ring_enqueue(std_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - printf("%s: error, enqueue failed\n", __func__);
> > - goto test_fail;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 0, std_r);
> > ret = test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - printf("%s: error, enqueue failed\n", __func__);
> > - goto test_fail;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == 0, exact_sz_r);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
> > }
> > ret = test_ring_enqueue(std_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> > - if (ret != -ENOBUFS) {
> > - printf("%s: error, unexpected successful enqueue\n",
> > - __func__);
> > - goto test_fail;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == -ENOBUFS, std_r);
> > ret = test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> > - if (ret == -ENOBUFS) {
> > - printf("%s: error, enqueue failed\n", __func__);
> > - goto test_fail;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret != -ENOBUFS, exact_sz_r);
> > cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
> >
> > /* check that dequeue returns the expected number of
> elements */
> > ret = test_ring_dequeue(exact_sz_r, cur_dst, esize[i], ring_sz,
> > TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BURST);
> > - if (ret != (int)ring_sz) {
> > - printf("%s: error, failed to dequeue expected nb of
> elements\n",
> > - __func__);
> > - goto test_fail;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(ret == (int)ring_sz, exact_sz_r);
> > cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], ring_sz);
> >
> > /* check that the capacity function returns expected value */
> > - if (rte_ring_get_capacity(exact_sz_r) != ring_sz) {
> > - printf("%s: error, incorrect ring capacity reported\n",
> > - __func__);
> > - goto test_fail;
> > - }
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(rte_ring_get_capacity(exact_sz_r) ==
> ring_sz,
> > + exact_sz_r);
> >
> > /* check data */
> > - if (test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)))
> > - goto test_fail;
> > + TEST_RING_VERIFY(test_ring_mem_cmp(src, dst,
> > + RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst)) == 0,
> > + exact_sz_r);
> >
> > rte_free(src_orig);
> > rte_free(dst_orig);
> > @@ -1061,7 +993,7 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > -test_fail:
> > +fail:
> > rte_free(src_orig);
> > rte_free(dst_orig);
> > rte_ring_free(std_r);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-20 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-29 6:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] wrong pointer passed of ring Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 6:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] ring: fix the misdescription of the param Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 15:59 ` David Marchand
2020-07-29 16:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-07-29 19:34 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-30 10:16 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-31 5:26 ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-29 6:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] test/ring: fix wrong param passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 13:48 ` David Marchand
2020-07-29 14:16 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2020-07-29 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 21:24 ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-30 10:28 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-31 6:25 ` Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] wrong pointer passed and add check Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:51 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27 9:05 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/ring: fix the wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:51 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27 8:54 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/ring: add check to validate the dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:50 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27 8:47 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:28 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:29 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] test/ring: fix wrong number " Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:31 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:37 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-14 9:20 ` David Marchand
2020-09-11 16:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] test/ring: fix wrong number " Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-17 16:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-20 11:54 ` Feifei Wang [this message]
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 15:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-23 9:24 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VE1PR08MB567751C97487876B7D8CF1C2C83D0@VE1PR08MB5677.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).