DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
To: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	 "declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"radu.nicolau@intel.com" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
	"david.coyle@intel.com" <david.coyle@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] security: update session create API
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 08:47:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB3168D1CE10A32F9E7D67A7F2E6010@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7412297a-c289-3da9-3f15-7dfc5a818a88@partner.samsung.com>

Hi Lukasz,
> Hi Akhil,
> 
> just one more thing, rest looks good
> 
> <snip>
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_security.c b/app/test/test_security.c
> > index 77fd5adc6..62e4991eb 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_security.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_security.c
> > @@ -363,8 +392,13 @@ static struct mock_session_destroy_data {
> >   static int
> >   mock_session_destroy(void *device, struct rte_security_session *sess)
> >   {
> > -	mock_session_destroy_exp.called++;
> > +	void *sess_priv = get_sec_session_private_data(sess);
> >
> > +	mock_session_destroy_exp.called++;
> > +	if ((mock_session_create_exp.ret == 0) && (sess_priv != NULL)) {
> mock_session_destroy_exp.ret
> > +		rte_mempool_put(rte_mempool_from_obj(sess_priv),
> sess_priv);
> > +		set_sec_session_private_data(sess, NULL);
> > +	}
> >
> 	MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_destroy_ex
> p, device);
> >
> 	MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_destroy_ex
> p, sess);
> >
> <snip>
> > @@ -1371,6 +1492,7 @@ test_session_destroy_ops_failure(void)
> >   	mock_session_destroy_exp.ret = -1;
> >
> >   	TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(1);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_PRIV_MP_USAGE(1);
> >   	TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(1);
> >
> >   	int ret = rte_security_session_destroy(&ut_params->ctx,
> > @@ -1396,6 +1518,7 @@ test_session_destroy_success(void)
> >   	mock_session_destroy_exp.sess = ut_params->sess;
> >   	mock_session_destroy_exp.ret = 0;
> >   	TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(1);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_PRIV_MP_USAGE(1);
> >   	TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(1);
> >
> >   	int ret = rte_security_session_destroy(&ut_params->ctx,
> >   			ut_params->sess);
> >
> 	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_destr
> oy,
> > 			ret, -1, "%d");
> >   	TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_destroy_exp, 1);
> >   	TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(1);
> nit: you can add and assertion here as well: TEST_ASSERT_PRIV_MP_USAGE(1);

Thanks for the review of the patch.

This is causing the test to fail. And I cannot spend more time in debugging this right now.
Since we are approaching RC1 deadline and the intent of the patch is to add a new
Parameter in session create API and which is complete. The issue is with the security
Tests which are trying to create mock driver APIs with no real usage.

Hence, I reckon we can go ahead with this patch in RC1 and fix it later.


@thomas@monjalon.net, @anoobj@marvell.com, @Ananyev, Konstantin.
Any thoughts from your side?

Regards,
Akhil



  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-18  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20200903201022eucas1p19a5154b9fb7063f72b18dea1114eeed3@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-09-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " akhil.goyal
2020-09-04 16:04   ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-10 22:09     ` Akhil Goyal
2020-09-24 16:22   ` Coyle, David
2020-10-10 22:06     ` Akhil Goyal
2020-10-10 22:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Akhil Goyal
2020-10-12 17:46     ` Akhil Goyal
2020-10-13  2:12     ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-14 19:00       ` Akhil Goyal
2020-10-15  1:14         ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-14 18:56     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Akhil Goyal
2020-10-15  1:11       ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-17 11:50       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Akhil Goyal
2020-10-17 13:13         ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-18  8:47           ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2020-10-18  9:30             ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-18  9:37               ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-18  9:42               ` Akhil Goyal
2020-10-18  9:40         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Akhil Goyal
2020-10-18 11:03           ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-19  7:51             ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VI1PR04MB3168D1CE10A32F9E7D67A7F2E6010@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=david.coyle@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).