From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
To: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
"anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"radu.nicolau@intel.com" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
"david.coyle@intel.com" <david.coyle@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] security: update session create API
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:00:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB3168F51D92B3A8B0357E5E61E6050@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b1e8aed-e4fe-a9fe-98b7-e40755b04e94@partner.samsung.com>
Hi Lukasz,
> Hi Akhil,
> > -#define SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_NAME "SecurityTestsMempoolName"
> > +#define SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_NAME "SecurityTestMp"
> > +#define SECURITY_TEST_PRIV_MEMPOOL_NAME "SecurityTestPrivMp"
> > #define SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE 15
> > #define SECURITY_TEST_SESSION_OBJECT_SIZE sizeof(struct
> rte_security_session)
> >
> > @@ -545,6 +548,22 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
> > SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ts_params->session_mpool,
> > "Cannot create mempool %s\n",
> rte_strerror(rte_errno));
> > +
> > + ts_params->session_priv_mpool = rte_mempool_create(
> > + SECURITY_TEST_PRIV_MEMPOOL_NAME,
> > + SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE,
> > + rte_security_session_get_size(&unittest_params.ctx),
> Call to rte_security_session_get_size() will cause a mockup function
> mock_session_get_size() to be called, which will return 0.
> Why do you call this function instead of defining some value for private
> mempool element size?
Fixed in v3
> > + 0, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> > + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > + if (ts_params->session_priv_mpool == NULL) {
> > + printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed (null): "
> > + "Cannot create priv mempool %s\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__, rte_strerror(rte_errno));
> Instead of printf() use RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,...). All other messages are
> printed this way. It allows control of error messages if required.
Fixed in v3, should be USER1 instead of EAL though.
> > + rte_mempool_free(ts_params->session_mpool);
> > + ts_params->session_mpool = NULL;
> > + return TEST_FAILED;
> > + }
> > +
> > return TEST_SUCCESS;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -559,6 +578,10 @@ testsuite_teardown(void)
> > rte_mempool_free(ts_params->session_mpool);
> > ts_params->session_mpool = NULL;
> > }
> > + if (ts_params->session_priv_mpool) {
> > + rte_mempool_free(ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> > + ts_params->session_priv_mpool = NULL;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -659,7 +682,8 @@ ut_setup_with_session(void)
> > mock_session_create_exp.ret = 0;
> >
> > sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params-
> >conf,
> > - ts_params->session_mpool);
> > + ts_params->session_mpool,
> > + ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> >
> TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_NOT_NULL(rte_security_sessio
> n_create,
> > sess);
> > TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(sess, mock_session_create_exp.sess,
> > @@ -701,7 +725,8 @@ test_session_create_inv_context(void)
> > struct rte_security_session *sess;
> >
> > sess = rte_security_session_create(NULL, &ut_params->conf,
> > - ts_params->session_mpool);
> > + ts_params->session_mpool,
> > + ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> >
> TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_creat
> e,
> > sess, NULL, "%p");
> > TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> > @@ -725,7 +750,8 @@ test_session_create_inv_context_ops(void)
> > ut_params->ctx.ops = NULL;
> >
> > sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params-
> >conf,
> > - ts_params->session_mpool);
> > + ts_params->session_mpool,
> > + ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> >
> TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_creat
> e,
> > sess, NULL, "%p");
> > TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> > @@ -749,7 +775,8 @@ test_session_create_inv_context_ops_fun(void)
> > ut_params->ctx.ops = &empty_ops;
> >
> > sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params-
> >conf,
> > - ts_params->session_mpool);
> > + ts_params->session_mpool,
> > + ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> >
> TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_creat
> e,
> > sess, NULL, "%p");
> > TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> > @@ -770,7 +797,8 @@ test_session_create_inv_configuration(void)
> > struct rte_security_session *sess;
> >
> > sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, NULL,
> > - ts_params->session_mpool);
> > + ts_params->session_mpool,
> > + ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> >
> TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_creat
> e,
> > sess, NULL, "%p");
> > TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0);
> > @@ -781,7 +809,7 @@ test_session_create_inv_configuration(void)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * Test execution of rte_security_session_create with NULL mp parameter
> > + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create with NULL mempools
> > */
> > static int
> > test_session_create_inv_mempool(void)
> > @@ -790,7 +818,7 @@ test_session_create_inv_mempool(void)
> > struct rte_security_session *sess;
> >
> > sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params-
> >conf,
> > - NULL);
> > + NULL, NULL);
> It would be best to add a new testcase for verification of passing NULL
> private mempool.
> If you pass NULL as the primary mempool as in this testcase, the
> verification of priv mempool (rte_securitry.c:37) won't ever happen
> because rte_security_session_create() will return in line 36.
Added a new test. However that was really unnecessary and was an overkill
To add a new case for so many negative cases.
Please have a look at v3 and ack it if no further comments.
Regards,
Akhil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-14 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200903201022eucas1p19a5154b9fb7063f72b18dea1114eeed3@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-09-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " akhil.goyal
2020-09-04 16:04 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-10 22:09 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-09-24 16:22 ` Coyle, David
2020-10-10 22:06 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-10-10 22:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Akhil Goyal
2020-10-12 17:46 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-10-13 2:12 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-14 19:00 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2020-10-15 1:14 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-14 18:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Akhil Goyal
2020-10-15 1:11 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-17 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Akhil Goyal
2020-10-17 13:13 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-18 8:47 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-10-18 9:30 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-18 9:37 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-18 9:42 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-10-18 9:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Akhil Goyal
2020-10-18 11:03 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-19 7:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR04MB3168F51D92B3A8B0357E5E61E6050@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=david.coyle@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).