DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/x86: fix some CPU extended features
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 11:15:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWAaQGj4pEJmLh9R@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211006192008.23369-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>

On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 09:20:08PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Caught while checking CPUID related stuff in OVS.
> 
> According to [1], for Structured Extended Feature Flags Enumeration Leaf
> (EAX = 0x07H, ECX = 0):
> 
> - BMI1 is associated to EBX, bit 3 (was incorrectly 2),
> - SMEP is associated to EBX, bit 7 (was incorrectly 6),
> - BMI2 is associated to EBX, bit 8 (was incorrectly 7),
> - ERMS is associated to EBX, bit 9 (was incorrectly 8),
> 
> This patch then sorts the rest of the extended features (leaf 0) for
> readability.
> 
> 1: https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/c5/15/architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.pdf
> 
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")

Wow, I'm surprised at it being incorrect this long, but checking the
original commit of code, it does indeed seem true that this is the correct
fixes line!

> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Ideally, I think the fixes should go in a separate patch from the
reordering, but I don't feel strongly about it so this is ok as either one
or two patches IMHO.

> ---
>  lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c b/lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c
> index d339734a8c..d6b518251b 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c
> @@ -100,18 +100,36 @@ const struct feature_entry rte_cpu_feature_table[] = {
>  	FEAT_DEF(ENERGY_EFF, 0x00000006, 0, RTE_REG_ECX,  3)
>  
>  	FEAT_DEF(FSGSBASE, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  0)
> -	FEAT_DEF(BMI1, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  2)
> +	FEAT_DEF(BMI1, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  3)
>  	FEAT_DEF(HLE, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  4)
>  	FEAT_DEF(AVX2, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  5)
> -	FEAT_DEF(SMEP, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  6)
> -	FEAT_DEF(BMI2, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  7)
> -	FEAT_DEF(ERMS, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  8)
> +	FEAT_DEF(SMEP, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  7)
> +	FEAT_DEF(BMI2, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  8)
> +	FEAT_DEF(ERMS, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX,  9)
>  	FEAT_DEF(INVPCID, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 10)
>  	FEAT_DEF(RTM, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 11)
>  	FEAT_DEF(AVX512F, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 16)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512DQ, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 17)
>  	FEAT_DEF(RDSEED, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 18)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512IFMA, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 21)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512CD, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 28)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512BW, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 30)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VL, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 31)
> +
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VBMI, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX,  1)
> +	FEAT_DEF(WAITPKG, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX,  5)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VBMI2, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX,  6)
> +	FEAT_DEF(GFNI, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX,  8)
> +	FEAT_DEF(VAES, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX,  9)
> +	FEAT_DEF(VPCLMULQDQ, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 10)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VNNI, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 11)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512BITALG, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 12)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VPOPCNTDQ, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 14)
> +	FEAT_DEF(CLDEMOTE, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 25)
> +	FEAT_DEF(MOVDIRI, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 27)
> +	FEAT_DEF(MOVDIR64B, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 28)
>  
> -	FEAT_DEF(WAITPKG, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 5)
> +	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VP2INTERSECT, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EDX,  8)
>  
>  	FEAT_DEF(LAHF_SAHF, 0x80000001, 0, RTE_REG_ECX,  0)
>  	FEAT_DEF(LZCNT, 0x80000001, 0, RTE_REG_ECX,  4)
> @@ -123,24 +141,6 @@ const struct feature_entry rte_cpu_feature_table[] = {
>  	FEAT_DEF(EM64T, 0x80000001, 0, RTE_REG_EDX, 29)
>  
>  	FEAT_DEF(INVTSC, 0x80000007, 0, RTE_REG_EDX,  8)
> -
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512DQ, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 17)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512IFMA, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 21)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512CD, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 28)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512BW, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 30)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VL, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EBX, 31)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VBMI, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 1)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VBMI2, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 6)
> -	FEAT_DEF(GFNI, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 8)
> -	FEAT_DEF(VAES, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 9)
> -	FEAT_DEF(VPCLMULQDQ, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 10)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VNNI, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 11)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512BITALG, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 12)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VPOPCNTDQ, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX,  14)
> -	FEAT_DEF(CLDEMOTE, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 25)
> -	FEAT_DEF(MOVDIRI, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 27)
> -	FEAT_DEF(MOVDIR64B, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_ECX, 28)
> -	FEAT_DEF(AVX512VP2INTERSECT, 0x00000007, 0, RTE_REG_EDX, 8)
>  };
>  
>  int
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-08 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-06 19:20 David Marchand
2021-10-08 10:15 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2021-10-08 11:08   ` David Marchand
2021-10-08 12:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal/x86: fix some CPU extended features definitions David Marchand
2021-10-08 12:07   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal/x86: sort " David Marchand
2021-10-12 19:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal/x86: fix some " David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWAaQGj4pEJmLh9R@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).