From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com>,
Steve Yang <stevex.yang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
xiaoyun.li@intel.com, "Iremonger,
Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/testpmd: fix max-pkt-len option invalid
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:57:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9a473ab-163a-cb9b-1371-585ceba1ec77@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADyeNEBhU4fNbTRaiFr+bj+t6oiPKkwjyAyKQ9upufJ_HDYhGA@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/25/2021 3:46 PM, Lance Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:35 AM Steve Yang <stevex.yang@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Moved the setting of 'DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME' from
>> 'cmd_config_max_pkt_len_parsed()' to 'init_config()' caused fail the case
>> where 'max_rx_pkt_len' is changed from the command line via
>> "port config all max-pkt-len".
>>
>> The 'init_config()' function is only called when testpmd is started,
>> but the DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME setting needs to be recomputed whenever
>> 'max_rx_pkt_len' changes.
>>
>> Define the 'update_jumbo_frame_offload()' function for both 'init_config()'
>> and 'cmd_config_max_pkt_len_parsed()', and detect if 'max_rx_pkt_len'
>> should be update to 1500 + overhead as default configuration. At the same
>> time, the offloads of rx queue also should update the value once port
>> offloads changed (e.g.: disabled JUMBO_FRAME offload via changed
>> max-pkt-len, reproduce steps [1]), otherwise, it would cause unexpected
>> result.
>>
>> [1]
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-testpmd -c 0xf -n 4 -- -i
>> --max-pkt-len=9000 --tx-offloads=0x8000 --rxq=4 --txq=4 --disable-rss
>> testpmd> set verbose 3
>> testpmd> port stop all
>> testpmd> port config all max-pkt-len 1518 port start all
>>
>> // Got fail error info without this patch
>> Configuring Port 0 (socket 1)
>> Ethdev port_id=0 rx_queue_id=0, new added offloads 0x800 must be
>> within per-queue offload capabilities 0x0 in rte_eth_rx_queue_setup()
>> Fail to configure port 0 rx queues //<-- Fail error info;
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Fixes: 761c4d6690 ("app/testpmd: fix max Rx packet length for VLAN packets")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Yang <stevex.yang@intel.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
>> app/test-pmd/parameters.c | 1 +
>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 2 ++
>> 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> index 89034c8b72..8b6b7b6206 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> @@ -1901,6 +1901,7 @@ cmd_config_max_pkt_len_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>> printf("Unknown parameter\n");
>> return;
>> }
>> + update_jumbo_frame_offload(pid, false);
>
> I'm probably missing something, but why isn't this a matter of simply calling
> port_mtu_set() here (with mtu computed from max pkt len) and keeping
> init_config() as currently implemented?
>
They are very similar, calling the 'port_mtu_set()' can be an option, but it is
headache to get dev->info first and calculate overhead to be able to call
'port_mtu_set()';
Since this is already done in 'init_config()', converting it to a function and
reuse it also looks valid as done here.
I am updating that function and sending a new version soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-25 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-22 8:13 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] app/testpmd: fix dynamic config error for max-pkt-len Steve Yang
2020-12-23 2:27 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2020-12-23 8:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix dynamic config error Steve Yang
2020-12-23 9:00 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-01-13 8:13 ` Chen, BoX C
2021-01-19 15:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-22 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] fix 'max-pkt-len' errors Steve Yang
2021-01-22 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: fix MTU doesn't update when jumbo frame disabled Steve Yang
2021-01-25 7:12 ` Huisong Li
[not found] ` <DM6PR11MB43628A600BAAEC75FFF1343BF9BD9@DM6PR11MB4362.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-01-25 12:38 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-22 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/testpmd: fix max-pkt-len option invalid Steve Yang
2021-01-22 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] app/testpmd: fix dynamic config error Steve Yang
2021-01-22 17:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-22 17:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-25 8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] fix 'max-pkt-len' errors Steve Yang
2021-01-25 8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: fix MTU doesn't update when jumbo frame disabled Steve Yang
2021-01-25 12:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-25 8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/testpmd: fix max-pkt-len option invalid Steve Yang
2021-01-25 14:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-25 15:46 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-25 17:57 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-01-25 18:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] app/testpmd: fix setting maximum packet length Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-25 19:41 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-26 0:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-26 3:22 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-26 3:45 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-26 7:54 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-01-26 11:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-28 21:36 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-28 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-26 9:02 ` [dpdk-dev] " Wisam Monther
2021-01-27 3:04 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-01-28 1:57 ` Chen, BoX C
2021-01-28 9:18 ` Wisam Monther
2021-01-28 9:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-28 11:08 ` Wisam Monther
2021-01-28 12:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-29 9:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9a473ab-163a-cb9b-1371-585ceba1ec77@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=lance.richardson@broadcom.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=stevex.yang@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).