DPDK community structure changes
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
To: Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com>, "moving@dpdk.org" <moving@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Proposing to cancel tomorrow's "Moving DPDK to LF" call
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:51:49 +0000
Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA722C094D@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce9a4f32-4a3c-3cfb-077c-bf484d16579d@redhat.com>

> From: moving [mailto:moving-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary
> Thanks Tim,
> I think the main blocking factor at this stage is a budget refresh that
> we can use as a basis for relative priorities for expenditure - which
> will feed into funding level discussions.

We talked about that at a recent meeting. What we have currently is an estimated budget - essentially a list of things we'd like to fund, and a total budget that seems reasonable given the likely membership and membership rates. We talked about whether we needed to scrub that estimated budget again now, but agreed that it was good enough at the moment.

Once we've confirmed who the expected project members are, and the final membership rates (we seem to be converging on ~$50k for Gold and ~$5-20K for Silver, although we do need to finalise those numbers) then we'll have a clear idea of what the actual budget is likely to be. At that point, we'll definitely need to prioritise and determine what can and cannot be funded.

> Thanks,
> Dave.
> On 02/20/2017 09:26 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > I propose that we cancel tomorrow's call on "Moving DPDK to the Linux
> Foundation". The main item we need to talk about is the status of the
> membership discussions, and whether it's realistic to be ready for a
> project launch to coincide with ONS at the start of April. However, due
> to the LF's open source leadership summit last week and a public holiday
> in the USA today (Presidents' Day), I don't think much will have changed
> since our last discussion on this. Postponing this for a week will allow
> more time for 1:1 discussions to happen so that we have a full picture.
> >
> > If anybody has any concerns, or other topics that they want to cover
> tomorrow, please comment. If there are no objections then we'll cancel
> tomorrow's meeting and discuss membership status next week instead.
> >
> >
> > Tim
> >
> --
> Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
> Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
> Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338

      reply	other threads:[~2017-02-20 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-20 14:26 O'Driscoll, Tim
2017-02-20 16:36 ` Dave Neary
2017-02-20 22:51   ` O'Driscoll, Tim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA722C094D@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
    --cc=dneary@redhat.com \
    --cc=moving@dpdk.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK community structure changes

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/moving/0 moving/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 moving moving/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/moving \
	public-inbox-index moving

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git