From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com> To: Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com>, "moving@dpdk.org" <moving@dpdk.org> Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, February 28th Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:40:27 +0000 Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA722C8227@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <d495177e-11f0-a59c-9d43-0eca8804bf18@redhat.com> > From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary@redhat.com] > > Hi Tim, > > May I propose that we schedule a board meeting and silver member board > seat election either to happen at ONS, or (ideally) to happen before > ONS, after March 27th? The first item of the agenda would be > introductions, the second would be budget priorities, given available > resources (which by then will be known). Yes, that sounds good to me. I think we should do that. > > Thanks, > Dave. > > On 03/01/2017 09:12 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > > Here are my notes from yesterday's call. Please feel free to correct > any errors or to add additional details. > > > > Attendees: Dave Neary (Red Hat), Ed Warnicke (Cisco), Erez Scop > (Mellanox), George Zhao (Huawei), Jan Blunck (Brocade), John Bromhead > (Cavium), John McNamara (Intel), Keith Wiles (Intel), Kevin Traynor (Red > Hat), Olga Shern (Mellanox), Thomas Monjalon (6WIND), Tim O'Driscoll > (Intel) > > > > Firstly, here are some links to help keep track of things: > > Project Charter: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x43ycfW3arJNX- > e6NQt3OVzAuNXtD7dppIhrY48FoGs > > Budget estimate: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1- > 3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit#gid=302618256 > > Reference Lab Proposal: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2017- > February/000177.html > > Technical governance, including info on Maintainers and sub-trees: > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/index.html & > http://dpdk.org/dev. > > Summary of discussion at Userspace event in Dublin: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-October/049259.html > > Minutes of January 10th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2017- > January/000136.html > > Minutes of January 17th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2017- > January/000157.html > > Minutes of January 24th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2017- > January/000162.html > > Minutes of January 31st call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2017- > February/000176.html > > Minutes of February 7th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2017- > February/000179.html > > Minutes of February 14th call: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2017-February/000180.html > > > > > > Membership status: > > - Based on discussions with potential members, $50k seems a good level > for those considering gold level membership. Agreed $50k membership fee > for gold members. > > - LF proposed a $5-20k sliding scale for silver members. That seems > reasonable, but we need some details on what that sliding scale is. > Presumably there's a model from other LF projects that we can reuse. > I'll follow up with Mike to get more details on this. > > - Agreed to target a project launch at ONS (April 3-6). This is very > tight though so we'll need to move quickly. > > - Ed pointed out that even things that seem simple like agreeing > quotes for a press release can take a long time. > > - We need to finalise the charter. Can those who are considering > becoming members review one last time and we can aim to finalise it at > next week's meeting. We do need to be careful not to raise issues that > we've discussed and resolved previously. > > - We discussed whether we need to add the next level of detail on > membership benefits to the charter. This might include things like > specifying how gold and silver members are identified/promoted at DPDK > events, further details on lab access/rates for gold and silver members > etc. The disadvantages are that firstly these details may take a long > time to agree, and secondly that putting this info into the charter > constrains what the governing board can and cannot do in future. The > consensus was to keep the charter at the current level of detail and > leave these details for the governing board to define once it's in > place. > > - Agreed that we do need a summary of membership levels, rates and > benefits that people can use to explain this to their management when > requesting approval. I'll work on a draft before next week's meeting. > > > > Summary: > > - Target launch date is ONS (April 3-6). > > - Companies will need to sign up 1 week before then (Monday March > 27th). > > - We'll aim to finalise the charter at next week's meeting, and have a > draft of the membership agreement from the LF. > > > > DNS Transfer: > > - Thomas is working on DNS transfer for dpdk.org to the LF. Nobody had > any objections to this. > > > > > > Next Meeting: > > Tuesday March 7th at 3pm GMT, 4pm CET, 10am EST, 7am PST (I'll send an > update to extend the meeting series). Access numbers for the call are: > > Skype meeting: https://meet.intel.com/tim.odriscoll/97F0Q1HF > > France: +33 1588 77298 > > UK: +44 179340 2663 > > USA: +1 916 356 2663 > > Bridge Number: 5 > > Conference ID: 120705852 > > The goal for the next meeting is to finalise the charter and > membership agreement. > > > > -- > Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy > Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com > Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-01 14:43 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-03-01 14:12 O'Driscoll, Tim 2017-03-01 14:36 ` Dave Neary 2017-03-01 14:40 ` O'Driscoll, Tim [this message] 2017-03-01 14:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA722C8227@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \ --to=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \ --cc=dneary@redhat.com \ --cc=moving@dpdk.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
DPDK community structure changes This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/moving/0 moving/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 moving moving/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/moving \ moving@dpdk.org public-inbox-index moving Example config snippet for mirrors. Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.moving AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git