DPDK community structure changes
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ed Warnicke <hagbard@gmail.com>
To: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@nxp.com>
Cc: Michael Dolan <mdolan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Ed Warnicke (eaw)" <eaw@cisco.com>,
	 "O'driscoll, Tim" <tim.o'driscoll@intel.com>,
	"moving@dpdk.org" <moving@dpdk.org>,
	 Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:10:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFVSqg01oQJTtu1p3i1552wochtGWa_-M5BKVTY6n+iV0sFK=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM3PR04MB3068496377678E9E9478147FD7C0@AM3PR04MB306.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4759 bytes --]

Jaswinder,

The fd.io infrastructure is for use by fd.io projects.

DPDK would be welcome as a fd.io project.

If the goal is for DPDK to move somewhere neutral and open with best of
breed governance and resourcing for open CI then becoming a fd.io project
might be the simplest route.   Most of the participants in discussions
around DPDK moving are already fd.io members.

fd.io’s governance is compatible with what we have been discussing.  Should
DPDK join fd.io it would, as all fd.io projects, maintain its own internal
technical governance.

Ed

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@nxp.com>
wrote:

> Ed,
>
>
>
> Do you see any issues in DPDK-project re-using FD.IO …Lab/CI
> infrastructure.
>
>
>
> This can save some dollars for all the participating companies.
>
>
>
> -Jaswinder
>
>
>
> *From:* moving [mailto:moving-bounces@dpdk.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael
> Dolan
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:43 PM
> *To:* Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
> *Cc:* O'driscoll, Tim <tim.o'driscoll@intel.com>; moving@dpdk.org
> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees
>
>
>
> Hi Vincent, there's the Annual LF membership fee and the Annual DPDK
> participation fee. If a company is already an LF member, then there's no LF
> membership fee and it's just the annual DPDK participation fee.
>
>
>
> As I understand it there's been discussion that the DPDK Governing Board
> might want to setup a test lab. I have no idea what the requirements or
> cost of that would be and if it would be managed by a member (or members)
> or the LF. Some projects have a member who steps up to run infrastructure
> for a project, and some want it in the community's control. We don't care
> where/how it's done but if the LF is asked to do it, we have to cover our
> costs.
>
>
>
> Regarding a lab, this group should also consider that FD.io already has a
> test lab that does what I'm guessing the DPDK community wants - it would
> seem to me a huge waste to have largely the same companies setup two labs
> doing the same thing. This was a big part of my original suggestion of just
> working on DPDK under FD.io, but as I understand it some were uncomfortable
> with that. I'm not aware of the issues, but objectively looking at this
> from a distance I still think that would be a very wise option to consider.
> The infrastructure, the organization, funding and membership are already
> there and I think DPDK could operate fairly well on its own with perhaps
> some changes to the technical governance if there are concerns. I'll leave
> my suggestion at that for now, but I know the people funding these projects
> are not going to be pleased to hear they're being asked to fund two nearly
> identical projects. If not merging the projects, then perhaps consider at
> least splitting the cost of infrastructure or a test lab...
>
>
>
> As for events, if the Governing Board decides to host an event, some
> projects pay for events out of the membership fees and that's it, some have
> sponsorships or attendance fees. That's all up to the group that makes the
> decision.
>
>
>
> The LF has no individual "membership". We have individual supporters (
> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/members/individual-supporters) but that's
> not the same as the legal standing of a member. We do also have an
> associate membership for nonprofits, government agencies, and education
> institutions.
>
>
>
> I hope this helps clarify,
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Mike Dolan
> VP of Strategic Programs
> The Linux Foundation
> Office: +1.330.460.3250 <(330)%20460-3250>   Cell: +1.440.552.5322
> <(440)%20552-5322>  Skype: michaelkdolan
> mdolan@linuxfoundation.org
> ---
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
> wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> Following yesterday's call, the LF's website
>   https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/bylaws
> includes the fees.
>
> Platinum
>     US$ 500,000
> Gold
>     US$ 100,000
> Silver
>     US$ 20,000 (employee size greater than 5,000)
>     US$ 15,000 (employee size between 500 and 4,999)
>     US$ 10,000 (employee size between 100 and 499)
>     US$ 5,000 (employee size <100)
>
> There is no option for individuals (I do not know it it makes sense).
>
> It is understood that there are three annual fees for DPDK to be cumulated:
>   -   Annual's LF fee (see the bylaws)
>   - + Annual's DPDK fee (TBD for both levels)
>   - + Annual's DPDK lab fee (TBD)
>  (- + DPDK events)
>
> Feel free to correct if I am mis-interpreting something.
>
> Thank you,
>   Vincent
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9017 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-17 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-11 12:21 Vincent JARDIN
2017-01-11 15:12 ` Michael Dolan
2017-01-17 14:16   ` Jaswinder Singh
2017-01-17 20:10     ` Ed Warnicke [this message]
2017-01-17 22:28       ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2017-01-17 23:46         ` Vincent JARDIN
2017-01-18 17:11           ` George Zhao
2017-01-18 17:14             ` Michael Dolan
2017-01-18 17:19               ` George Zhao
2017-01-18 18:47                 ` Vincent Jardin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFVSqg01oQJTtu1p3i1552wochtGWa_-M5BKVTY6n+iV0sFK=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hagbard@gmail.com \
    --cc=eaw@cisco.com \
    --cc=jaswinder.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=mdolan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=moving@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tim.o'driscoll@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.jardin@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK community structure changes

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/moving/0 moving/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 moving moving/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/moving \
		moving@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index moving

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.moving


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git