Soft Patch Panel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [spp] [PATCH 0/4] correctly allocate ring resource
@ 2019-02-08  8:47 x-fn-spp
  2019-02-13  7:29 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: x-fn-spp @ 2019-02-08  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ferruh.yigit, ogawa.yasufumi; +Cc: spp

From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>

>From 18.08.1, there is a problem that ring status is not shown
correctly when adding ring second time. 
It is because how to handle delete ring request from user is wrong. 
To resolve, this patch provides the following for spp_nfv
- Replace handling of delete ring request with rte_eth_dev_stop() and 
  rte_eth_dev_close()
- Add existence check of DPDK port when adding ring

This patch series also provides fix for spp_vf and spp_pcap because 
a problem which is caused by incorrect allocation of ring resource exists..

Note: this patch set relies on another patch set 
"introduce new feature SPP PCAP".

Hideyuki Yamashita (4):
  shared: fix trying to create ring already exist
  spp_nfv: fix incorrect deleting for ring port
  spp_vf: fix trying to create ring already exist
  spp_pcap: fix trying to create ring already exist

 src/nfv/commands.h              |  3 ++-
 src/pcap/spp_proc.c             | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 src/shared/secondary/add_port.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 src/vf/common/spp_proc.c        | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [spp] [PATCH 0/4] correctly allocate ring resource
  2019-02-08  8:47 [spp] [PATCH 0/4] correctly allocate ring resource x-fn-spp
@ 2019-02-13  7:29 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yasufumi Ogawa @ 2019-02-13  7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x-fn-spp; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, spp

On 2019/02/08 17:47, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote:
> From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>
> 
>>From 18.08.1, there is a problem that ring status is not shown
> correctly when adding ring second time.
> It is because how to handle delete ring request from user is wrong.
> To resolve, this patch provides the following for spp_nfv
> - Replace handling of delete ring request with rte_eth_dev_stop() and
>    rte_eth_dev_close()
> - Add existence check of DPDK port when adding ring
> 
> This patch series also provides fix for spp_vf and spp_pcap because
> a problem which is caused by incorrect allocation of ring resource exists..
> 
> Note: this patch set relies on another patch set
> "introduce new feature SPP PCAP".

Series of patches applied, thanks.
> 
> Hideyuki Yamashita (4):
>    shared: fix trying to create ring already exist
>    spp_nfv: fix incorrect deleting for ring port
>    spp_vf: fix trying to create ring already exist
>    spp_pcap: fix trying to create ring already exist
> 
>   src/nfv/commands.h              |  3 ++-
>   src/pcap/spp_proc.c             | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>   src/shared/secondary/add_port.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>   src/vf/common/spp_proc.c        | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>   4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 


-- 
Yasufumi Ogawa
NTT Network Service Systems Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-13  7:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-08  8:47 [spp] [PATCH 0/4] correctly allocate ring resource x-fn-spp
2019-02-13  7:29 ` Yasufumi Ogawa

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).