patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: "Joyce Kong" <joyce.kong@arm.com>,
	"Jakub Grajciar" <jgrajcia@cisco.com>,
	"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"Ruifeng Wang" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org,
	Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/memif: fix segfault with large burst size
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 15:41:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65b25f36-32fd-45cd-8f84-2058e941c361@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230904071041.3403495-1-joyce.kong@arm.com>

On 9/4/2023 8:10 AM, Joyce Kong wrote:
> There will be a segfault when Rx burst size is greater than
> MAX_PKT_BURST of memif. Fix the issue by correcting the
> wrong mbuf index in eth_memif_rx, which results in accessing
> invalid memory address.
> 
> Bugzilla ID: 1273
> Fixes: aa17df860891 ("net/memif: add a Rx fast path")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> 

Hi Joyce, good catch.

Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.



For record, if nb_pkts > MAX_PKT_BURST, memif buffer consumed in chunks
of MAX_PKT_BURST mbufs, next chunk consumption starts with 'goto
next_bulk' call.

For each chunk, MAX_PKT_BURST mbufs allocated and filled, they are
accessed by 'n_rx_pkts' index, but 'n_rx_pkts' is overall received mbuf
number, so it shouldn't be used as index for that chunk, but 'rx_pkts'
should be used which is reset at the beginning of the chunk processing.

For the first chunk using 'n_rx_pkts' or 'rx_pkts' are same, that
explains how issue lived till now, as commit log mentions issue can be
observed when nb_pkts > MAX_PKT_BURST.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-29 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-04  7:10 Joyce Kong
2023-09-27 16:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-29 14:41 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65b25f36-32fd-45cd-8f84-2058e941c361@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=jgrajcia@cisco.com \
    --cc=joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).