patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gaëtan Rivet" <grive@u256.net>
To: vipul.ashri@oracle.com, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/failsafe: link_update request crashing at boot
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:23:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87c84612-4116-4fe7-a711-f5f364513c3d@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021214215.1633-1-vipul.ashri@oracle.com>

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, at 23:42, vipul.ashri@oracle.com wrote:
> From: Vipul Ashri <vipul.ashri@oracle.com>
>
> failsafe crashed while sending early link_update request during
> boot time initialization.
> Based on debugging we found failsafe device was good but sub-
> devices were progressing towards initialization and SUBOPS macro
> where expanding macro gives [partial_dev]->dev_ops->link_update()
> execution of which triggered crash because dev_ops==0. similar
> crash seen at failsafe_eth_dev_close()
>
> Failsafe driver need a separate check for subdevices similar to
> "RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);" which is
> called to almost every eth_dev function.
>
> Fixes: a46f8d5 ("net/failsafe: add fail-safe PMD")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Vipul Ashri <vipul.ashri@oracle.com>

Hello Vipul,

I'm sorry for the delay, I missed your fix on the mailing list.

IIUC, the issue is that failsafe finished init and received an ethdev
operation call, but one of its sub-device, although marked DEV_ACTIVE,
has its eth_dev->dev_ops field NULL.

It is really surprising to me, because there aren't many ways for a sub-device
to become DEV_ACTIVE.

The only two ways are

  * by executing 'fs_dev_configure()', which will first execute
    rte_eth_dev_configure() on the sub-device, and on error would
    stop *without* setting DEV_ACTIVE.
    rte_eth_dev_configure() will itself execute
    RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV), so it would
    return negative errno and fs_dev_configure() would abort.

  * by executing 'fs_dev_remove()' and the sub-device was 'DEV_STARTED'
    to begin with, then it is retrograded to DEV_ACTIVE once stopped.

So I don't understand yet how it is possible for a sub-device to become DEV_ACTIVE
while its eth_dev->dev_ops are NULL. It seems more like a bug, memory corruption or
just an unexpected execution pattern.

Could describe in more detail the execution?
In particular, setting the EAL log-level to debug with the option:
' --log-level pmd.net.failsafe:debug '
for example while using testpmd or your DPDK app.
It should show ethdev level accesses to the sub-devices, and error values.

Best regards,
-- 
Gaetan Rivet

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: vipul.ashri@oracle.com
To: grive@u256.net, vipul.ashri@oracle.com, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/failsafe: link_update request crashing at boot
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:17:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87c84612-4116-4fe7-a711-f5f364513c3d@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20220214144720.gYziJxzZohYvqwFvMbNgCZCcQ00EaFCxY1fNx-X1_1U@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021214215.1633-1-vipul.ashri@oracle.com>

From: Gaëtan Rivet <grive@u256.net>

>On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, at 23:42, vipul.ashri@oracle.com wrote:
>> From: Vipul Ashri <vipul.ashri@oracle.com>
>>
>> failsafe crashed while sending early link_update request during
>> boot time initialization.
>> Based on debugging we found failsafe device was good but sub-
>> devices were progressing towards initialization and SUBOPS macro
>> where expanding macro gives [partial_dev]->dev_ops->link_update()
>> execution of which triggered crash because dev_ops==0. similar
>> crash seen at failsafe_eth_dev_close()
>>
>> Failsafe driver need a separate check for subdevices similar to
>> "RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);" which is
>> called to almost every eth_dev function.
>>
>> Fixes: a46f8d5 ("net/failsafe: add fail-safe PMD")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> Signed-off-by: Vipul Ashri <vipul.ashri@oracle.com>
>
>Hello Vipul,
>
>I'm sorry for the delay, I missed your fix on the mailing list.
>
>IIUC, the issue is that failsafe finished init and received an ethdev
>operation call, but one of its sub-device, although marked DEV_ACTIVE,
>has its eth_dev->dev_ops field NULL.
>
>It is really surprising to me, because there aren't many ways for a sub-device
>to become DEV_ACTIVE.
>
>The only two ways are
>
>  * by executing 'fs_dev_configure()', which will first execute
>    rte_eth_dev_configure() on the sub-device, and on error would
>    stop *without* setting DEV_ACTIVE.
>    rte_eth_dev_configure() will itself execute
>    RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV), so it would
>    return negative errno and fs_dev_configure() would abort.
>
>  * by executing 'fs_dev_remove()' and the sub-device was 'DEV_STARTED'
>    to begin with, then it is retrograded to DEV_ACTIVE once stopped.
>
>So I don't understand yet how it is possible for a sub-device to become DEV_ACTIVE
>while its eth_dev->dev_ops are NULL. It seems more like a bug, memory corruption or
>just an unexpected execution pattern.
>
>Could describe in more detail the execution?
>In particular, setting the EAL log-level to debug with the option:
>' --log-level pmd.net.failsafe:debug '
>for example while using testpmd or your DPDK app.
>It should show ethdev level accesses to the sub-devices, and error values.
>
>Best regards,
>-- 
>Gaetan Rivet

Hi Gaetan

Sorry for very late reply, we were busy working on 21.11 integration.
Although we have adopted this code internally for us but I am sharing the patch to opensource for community benefit.

This is specific case of AZURE setup with our very customized complex environment.

Let me share the logs with traceback first
==================================================================================================================
SECONDARY PROCESS
timestamp=1633598184
TCZ0.0.0 Cycle 152 (Build 1832)
signal 11 (Segmentation fault), address is 0x31117bbce6c8 from 0x47d08b1

[bt]: ( 1) _Z18snprintf_backtraceRPciiP9siginfo_tPv      (+   0xf4) - sp = 0x7fffef3fd110, ip = 0x3acdc54
[bt]: ( 2) _Z13crit_err_hdlriP9siginfo_tPv               (+  0x159) - sp = 0x7fffef3fdc20, ip = 0x3acdf29
[bt]: ( 3) _ZN13SignalAdapter12handleSignalEiP9siginfo_tPv (+  0x104) - sp = 0x7fffef3fdf00, ip = 0x274d4c4
[bt]: ( 4) _L_unlock_18                                  (+   0x2c) - sp = 0x7fffef3fdf80, ip = 0x7ffff7bce630
[bt]: ( 5) rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary                  (+   0x21) - sp = 0x7fffef3fec50, ip = 0x47d08b1
[bt]: ( 6) rte_eth_from_ring                             (+ 0x3438) - sp = 0x7fffef3fec80, ip = 0x4e49da8
[bt]: ( 7) _init                                         (+ 0xa1b8) - sp = 0x7fffef3feec0, ip = 0x12e0368
[bt]: ( 8) local_dev_probe                               (+   0xac) - sp = 0x7fffef3feef0, ip = 0x478fd2c
[bt]: ( 9) rte_uuid_unparse                              (+  0x274) - sp = 0x7fffef3fef30, ip = 0x47a3e94
[bt]: (10) rte_eal_vfio_get_vf_token                     (+   0xd7) - sp = 0x7fffef3ff110, ip = 0x47b04b7
[bt]: (11) eal_hugepage_info_read                        (+  0x602) - sp = 0x7fffef3ff170, ip = 0x47b2cd2
[bt]: (12) start_thread                                  (+   0xc5) - sp = 0x7fffef3ff220, ip = 0x7ffff7bc6ea5
[bt]: (13) clone                                         (+   0x6d) - sp = 0x7fffef3ff2c0, ip = 0x7ffff004096d
EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /var/run/dpdk/oracusbc/mp_socket:eal_dev_mp_request
EAL: Cannot send request to primary
EAL: Failed to send hotplug request to primary
net_failsafe: Failed to probe devargs net_tap_vsc0
EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /var/run/dpdk/oracusbc/mp_socket:eal_dev_mp_request
EAL: Cannot send request to primary
EAL: Failed to send hotplug request to primary
net_failsafe: Failed to probe devargs net_tap_vsc1
EAL: No legacy callbacks, legacy socket not created
EAL: Drop mp reply: eal_dev_mp_request
==================================================================================================================
PRIMARY PROCESS
timestamp=1633598196
TCZ0.0.0 Cycle 152 (Build 1832)
signal 11 (Segmentation fault), address is 0x38 from 0x9d8fbe

[bt]: ( 1) _Z18snprintf_backtraceRPciiP9siginfo_tPv      (+   0xf4) - sp = 0x7fffecf41150, ip = 0x100dd44
[bt]: ( 2) _Z13crit_err_hdlriP9siginfo_tPv               (+  0x159) - sp = 0x7fffecf41c60, ip = 0x100e019
[bt]: ( 3) _ZN13SignalAdapter12handleSignalEiP9siginfo_tPv (+  0x104) - sp = 0x7fffecf41f40, ip = 0xff4894
[bt]: ( 4) _L_unlock_18                                  (+   0x2c) - sp = 0x7fffecf41fc0, ip = 0x7ffff61d9630
[bt]: ( 5) failsafe_eth_dev_close                        (+  0x65e) - sp = 0x7fffecf42c90, ip = 0x9d8fbe
[bt]: ( 6) rte_eth_link_get_nowait                       (+   0x6a) - sp = 0x7fffecf42cf0, ip = 0x62fa0a
[bt]: ( 7) _ZN11StatsThread9statsLoopEP10CustomObject      (+  0x33e) - sp = 0x7fffecf42d20, ip = 0xedea2e
[bt]: ( 8) _ZN11StatsThread9statsLoopEP10CustomObject      (+  0x8dc) - sp = 0x7fffecf42d90, ip = 0xedefcc
[bt]: ( 9) ThreadFunction                                (+   0xe6) - sp = 0x7fffecf42db0, ip = 0x7ffff6b477e6
[bt]: (10) start_thread                                  (+   0xc5) - sp = 0x7fffecf42de0, ip = 0x7ffff61d1ea5
[bt]: (11) clone                                         (+   0x6d) - sp = 0x7fffecf42e80, ip = 0x7ffff0a6b96d

==================================================================================================================
DPDK 20.11.2
core mask is 00000000000000000000000000004000
DPDK Custom Process initialized with 2 ports
the min max TxQ is maxTxQueues 16
Using 1 RxQs for port 0 (# F-core=1)
Using 1 RxQs for port 3 (# F-core=1)
Core 14 (port=0, rxQ=0) kni_ring=(nil)
Core 14 (port=3, rxQ=0) kni_ring=(nil)
Core 14 txN = 0
Thread for core 14 using ring from usbc of 0x31117b29bb00
Ring size must be powers of 2, adjusting from 8196 to 16384
Thread for core 14 using ring from MEDIA of 0x31117b27b840
Encaps Memory Zone= 48044 sizeof encaps = 60
Trace Memory Zone= 272
Policy Memory Zone= 8196 sizeof policy = 240
link status for port 0 is 1
link status for port 3 is 1
PORT 0 supports 16 rx queues and 16 tx queues (driver_name = net_failsafe, driver_type = 16)
PORT 0 is polling for link-change, interrupts disabled
[DPDK] tap_flow_create(): Kernel refused TC filter rule creation (17): File exists
[DPDK] net_failsafe: Failed to create flow on sub_device 1
add_flow(): create() fails for port 0; Reason: overlapping rules or Kernel too old for flower support
Error adding broadcast flow
PORT 3 supports 16 rx queues and 16 tx queues (driver_name = net_failsafe, driver_type = 16)
PORT 3 is polling for link-change, interrupts disabled
[DPDK] EAL: Failed to hotplug add device on primary
[DPDK] tap_flow_create(): Kernel refused TC filter rule creation (17): File exists
[DPDK] net_failsafe: Failed to create flow on sub_device 1
add_flow(): create() fails for port 3; Reason: overlapping rules or Kernel too old for flower support
Error adding broadcast flow
Cmd Thread is available
Capture object initialized
init :Stats Thread is available
ifLinkUpdate: Sending OperStatus for port=0 stat=1
ifLinkUpdate: Port 0 Link Change - speed 40000 Mbps - full-duplex
[DPDK] EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /var/run/dpdk/oracusbc/mp_socket_2934_298e9db8d1:eal_dev_mp_request
[DPDK] EAL: rte_mp_request_sync failed
[DPDK] EAL: Failed to send hotplug request to secondary
[DPDK] EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /var/run/dpdk/oracusbc/mp_socket_2934_298e9db8d1:eal_dev_mp_request
[DPDK] EAL: rte_mp_request_sync failed
[DPDK] EAL: Failed to hotplug add device on primary
[DPDK] Invalid port_id=2
[DPDK] net_failsafe: Operation rte_eth_stats_get failed for sub_device 1 with error -19

There is some race at secondary process and primary got crashed because its data-structures and partially filled.
Let me know if you need GDB analysis, I can share with next reply if you are still unsatisfied. GDB analysis will be bigger.
Thanks!

Regards

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: vipul.ashri@oracle.com
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: "Gaëtan Rivet" <grive@u256.net>, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/failsafe: link_update request crashing at boot
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:37:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87c84612-4116-4fe7-a711-f5f364513c3d@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20220215130751.JtnnILo8__RzsVbFKvCTElWRRnDcspJ9WLPMjYNdbWI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021214215.1633-1-vipul.ashri@oracle.com>

From: Gaëtan Rivet <grive@u256.net>

>On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, at 23:42, vipul.ashri@oracle.com wrote:
>> From: Vipul Ashri <vipul.ashri@oracle.com>
>>
>> failsafe crashed while sending early link_update request during
>> boot time initialization.
>> Based on debugging we found failsafe device was good but sub-
>> devices were progressing towards initialization and SUBOPS macro
>> where expanding macro gives [partial_dev]->dev_ops->link_update()
>> execution of which triggered crash because dev_ops==0. similar
>> crash seen at failsafe_eth_dev_close()
>>
>> Failsafe driver need a separate check for subdevices similar to
>> "RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);" which is
>> called to almost every eth_dev function.
>>
>> Fixes: a46f8d5 ("net/failsafe: add fail-safe PMD")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> Signed-off-by: Vipul Ashri <vipul.ashri@oracle.com>
>
>Hello Vipul,
>
>I'm sorry for the delay, I missed your fix on the mailing list.
>
>IIUC, the issue is that failsafe finished init and received an ethdev
>operation call, but one of its sub-device, although marked DEV_ACTIVE,
>has its eth_dev->dev_ops field NULL.
>
>It is really surprising to me, because there aren't many ways for a sub-device
>to become DEV_ACTIVE.
>
>The only two ways are
>
>  * by executing 'fs_dev_configure()', which will first execute
>    rte_eth_dev_configure() on the sub-device, and on error would
>    stop *without* setting DEV_ACTIVE.
>    rte_eth_dev_configure() will itself execute
>    RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV), so it would
>    return negative errno and fs_dev_configure() would abort.
>
>  * by executing 'fs_dev_remove()' and the sub-device was 'DEV_STARTED'
>    to begin with, then it is retrograded to DEV_ACTIVE once stopped.
>
>So I don't understand yet how it is possible for a sub-device to become DEV_ACTIVE
>while its eth_dev->dev_ops are NULL. It seems more like a bug, memory corruption or
>just an unexpected execution pattern.
>
>Could describe in more detail the execution?
>In particular, setting the EAL log-level to debug with the option:
>' --log-level pmd.net.failsafe:debug '
>for example while using testpmd or your DPDK app.
>It should show ethdev level accesses to the sub-devices, and error values.
>
>Best regards,
>-- 
>Gaetan Rivet

Hi Gaetan

Sorry for very late reply, we were busy working on 21.11 integration.
Although we have adopted this code internally for us but I am sharing the patch to opensource for community benefit.

This is specific case of AZURE setup with our very customized complex environment.

Let me share the logs with traceback first
==================================================================================================================
SECONDARY PROCESS
timestamp=1633598184
TCZ0.0.0 Cycle 152 (Build 1832)
signal 11 (Segmentation fault), address is 0x31117bbce6c8 from 0x47d08b1

[bt]: ( 1) _Z18snprintf_backtraceRPciiP9siginfo_tPv      (+   0xf4) - sp = 0x7fffef3fd110, ip = 0x3acdc54
[bt]: ( 2) _Z13crit_err_hdlriP9siginfo_tPv               (+  0x159) - sp = 0x7fffef3fdc20, ip = 0x3acdf29
[bt]: ( 3) _ZN13SignalAdapter12handleSignalEiP9siginfo_tPv (+  0x104) - sp = 0x7fffef3fdf00, ip = 0x274d4c4
[bt]: ( 4) _L_unlock_18                                  (+   0x2c) - sp = 0x7fffef3fdf80, ip = 0x7ffff7bce630
[bt]: ( 5) rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary                  (+   0x21) - sp = 0x7fffef3fec50, ip = 0x47d08b1
[bt]: ( 6) rte_eth_from_ring                             (+ 0x3438) - sp = 0x7fffef3fec80, ip = 0x4e49da8
[bt]: ( 7) _init                                         (+ 0xa1b8) - sp = 0x7fffef3feec0, ip = 0x12e0368
[bt]: ( 8) local_dev_probe                               (+   0xac) - sp = 0x7fffef3feef0, ip = 0x478fd2c
[bt]: ( 9) rte_uuid_unparse                              (+  0x274) - sp = 0x7fffef3fef30, ip = 0x47a3e94
[bt]: (10) rte_eal_vfio_get_vf_token                     (+   0xd7) - sp = 0x7fffef3ff110, ip = 0x47b04b7
[bt]: (11) eal_hugepage_info_read                        (+  0x602) - sp = 0x7fffef3ff170, ip = 0x47b2cd2
[bt]: (12) start_thread                                  (+   0xc5) - sp = 0x7fffef3ff220, ip = 0x7ffff7bc6ea5
[bt]: (13) clone                                         (+   0x6d) - sp = 0x7fffef3ff2c0, ip = 0x7ffff004096d
EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /var/run/dpdk/oracusbc/mp_socket:eal_dev_mp_request
EAL: Cannot send request to primary
EAL: Failed to send hotplug request to primary
net_failsafe: Failed to probe devargs net_tap_vsc0
EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /var/run/dpdk/oracusbc/mp_socket:eal_dev_mp_request
EAL: Cannot send request to primary
EAL: Failed to send hotplug request to primary
net_failsafe: Failed to probe devargs net_tap_vsc1
EAL: No legacy callbacks, legacy socket not created
EAL: Drop mp reply: eal_dev_mp_request
==================================================================================================================
PRIMARY PROCESS
timestamp=1633598196
TCZ0.0.0 Cycle 152 (Build 1832)
signal 11 (Segmentation fault), address is 0x38 from 0x9d8fbe

[bt]: ( 1) _Z18snprintf_backtraceRPciiP9siginfo_tPv      (+   0xf4) - sp = 0x7fffecf41150, ip = 0x100dd44
[bt]: ( 2) _Z13crit_err_hdlriP9siginfo_tPv               (+  0x159) - sp = 0x7fffecf41c60, ip = 0x100e019
[bt]: ( 3) _ZN13SignalAdapter12handleSignalEiP9siginfo_tPv (+  0x104) - sp = 0x7fffecf41f40, ip = 0xff4894
[bt]: ( 4) _L_unlock_18                                  (+   0x2c) - sp = 0x7fffecf41fc0, ip = 0x7ffff61d9630
[bt]: ( 5) failsafe_eth_dev_close                        (+  0x65e) - sp = 0x7fffecf42c90, ip = 0x9d8fbe
[bt]: ( 6) rte_eth_link_get_nowait                       (+   0x6a) - sp = 0x7fffecf42cf0, ip = 0x62fa0a
[bt]: ( 7) _ZN11StatsThread9statsLoopEP10CustomObject      (+  0x33e) - sp = 0x7fffecf42d20, ip = 0xedea2e
[bt]: ( 8) _ZN11StatsThread9statsLoopEP10CustomObject      (+  0x8dc) - sp = 0x7fffecf42d90, ip = 0xedefcc
[bt]: ( 9) ThreadFunction                                (+   0xe6) - sp = 0x7fffecf42db0, ip = 0x7ffff6b477e6
[bt]: (10) start_thread                                  (+   0xc5) - sp = 0x7fffecf42de0, ip = 0x7ffff61d1ea5
[bt]: (11) clone                                         (+   0x6d) - sp = 0x7fffecf42e80, ip = 0x7ffff0a6b96d

==================================================================================================================
DPDK 20.11.2
core mask is 00000000000000000000000000004000
DPDK Custom Process initialized with 2 ports
the min max TxQ is maxTxQueues 16
Using 1 RxQs for port 0 (# F-core=1)
Using 1 RxQs for port 3 (# F-core=1)
Core 14 (port=0, rxQ=0) kni_ring=(nil)
Core 14 (port=3, rxQ=0) kni_ring=(nil)
Core 14 txN = 0
Thread for core 14 using ring from usbc of 0x31117b29bb00
Ring size must be powers of 2, adjusting from 8196 to 16384
Thread for core 14 using ring from MEDIA of 0x31117b27b840
Encaps Memory Zone= 48044 sizeof encaps = 60
Trace Memory Zone= 272
Policy Memory Zone= 8196 sizeof policy = 240
link status for port 0 is 1
link status for port 3 is 1
PORT 0 supports 16 rx queues and 16 tx queues (driver_name = net_failsafe, driver_type = 16)
PORT 0 is polling for link-change, interrupts disabled
[DPDK] tap_flow_create(): Kernel refused TC filter rule creation (17): File exists
[DPDK] net_failsafe: Failed to create flow on sub_device 1
add_flow(): create() fails for port 0; Reason: overlapping rules or Kernel too old for flower support
Error adding broadcast flow
PORT 3 supports 16 rx queues and 16 tx queues (driver_name = net_failsafe, driver_type = 16)
PORT 3 is polling for link-change, interrupts disabled
[DPDK] EAL: Failed to hotplug add device on primary
[DPDK] tap_flow_create(): Kernel refused TC filter rule creation (17): File exists
[DPDK] net_failsafe: Failed to create flow on sub_device 1
add_flow(): create() fails for port 3; Reason: overlapping rules or Kernel too old for flower support
Error adding broadcast flow
Cmd Thread is available
Capture object initialized
init :Stats Thread is available
ifLinkUpdate: Sending OperStatus for port=0 stat=1
ifLinkUpdate: Port 0 Link Change - speed 40000 Mbps - full-duplex
[DPDK] EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /var/run/dpdk/oracusbc/mp_socket_2934_298e9db8d1:eal_dev_mp_request
[DPDK] EAL: rte_mp_request_sync failed
[DPDK] EAL: Failed to send hotplug request to secondary
[DPDK] EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /var/run/dpdk/oracusbc/mp_socket_2934_298e9db8d1:eal_dev_mp_request
[DPDK] EAL: rte_mp_request_sync failed
[DPDK] EAL: Failed to hotplug add device on primary
[DPDK] Invalid port_id=2
[DPDK] net_failsafe: Operation rte_eth_stats_get failed for sub_device 1 with error -19

There is some race at secondary process and primary got crashed because its data-structures and partially filled.
Let me know if you need GDB analysis, I can share with next reply if you are still unsatisfied. GDB analysis will be bigger.
Thanks!

Regards

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-22 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-21 11:51 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/1] " vipul.ashri
2021-10-21 21:42 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " vipul.ashri
2021-11-22  9:36   ` [dpdk-dev] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-22 10:23   ` Gaëtan Rivet [this message]
2022-02-14 14:47     ` vipul.ashri
2022-02-15 13:07     ` vipul.ashri
2022-02-15 16:24     ` Vipul Ashri
2022-02-15 16:46       ` Vipul Ashri
2023-10-17 16:43         ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-12 11:27           ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-07-07  9:35       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-14 13:44 ` vipul.ashri
2022-02-14 13:09 Vipul Ashri
2022-02-14 16:54 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87c84612-4116-4fe7-a711-f5f364513c3d@www.fastmail.com \
    --to=grive@u256.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=vipul.ashri@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).