* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 17.11] test/rwlock: benchmark on all available cores
@ 2019-07-25 6:50 Joyce Kong
2019-08-02 0:04 ` Yongseok Koh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joyce Kong @ 2019-07-25 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: nd
[ backported from upstream commit fe252fb695efa9deb95f2e6b7baf6f805996a5b0 ]
Add performance test on all available cores to benchmark
the scaling up performance of rw_lock.
Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Suggested-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
test/test/test_rwlock.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/test/test_rwlock.c b/test/test/test_rwlock.c
index 08685d3..1f327fe 100644
--- a/test/test/test_rwlock.c
+++ b/test/test/test_rwlock.c
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
static rte_rwlock_t sl;
static rte_rwlock_t sl_tab[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
+static rte_atomic32_t synchro;
static int
test_rwlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
@@ -94,6 +95,77 @@ test_rwlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
return 0;
}
+static rte_rwlock_t lk = RTE_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+static volatile uint64_t rwlock_data;
+static uint64_t lock_count[RTE_MAX_LCORE] = {0};
+
+#define TIME_MS 100
+#define TEST_RWLOCK_DEBUG 0
+
+static int
+load_loop_fn(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+{
+ uint64_t time_diff = 0, begin;
+ uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
+ uint64_t lcount = 0;
+ const unsigned int lcore = rte_lcore_id();
+
+ /* wait synchro for slaves */
+ if (lcore != rte_get_master_lcore())
+ while (rte_atomic32_read(&synchro) == 0)
+ ;
+
+ begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+ while (time_diff < hz * TIME_MS / 1000) {
+ rte_rwlock_write_lock(&lk);
+ ++rwlock_data;
+ rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&lk);
+
+ rte_rwlock_read_lock(&lk);
+ if (TEST_RWLOCK_DEBUG && !(lcount % 100))
+ printf("Core [%u] rwlock_data = %"PRIu64"\n",
+ lcore, rwlock_data);
+ rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&lk);
+
+ lcount++;
+ /* delay to make lock duty cycle slightly realistic */
+ rte_pause();
+ time_diff = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
+ }
+
+ lock_count[lcore] = lcount;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_rwlock_perf(void)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ uint64_t total = 0;
+
+ printf("\nRwlock Perf Test on %u cores...\n", rte_lcore_count());
+
+ /* clear synchro and start slaves */
+ rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 0);
+ if (rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(load_loop_fn, NULL, SKIP_MASTER) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ /* start synchro and launch test on master */
+ rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 1);
+ load_loop_fn(NULL);
+
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(i) {
+ printf("Core [%u] count = %"PRIu64"\n", i, lock_count[i]);
+ total += lock_count[i];
+ }
+
+ printf("Total count = %"PRIu64"\n", total);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
test_rwlock(void)
{
@@ -124,6 +196,9 @@ test_rwlock(void)
rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+ if (test_rwlock_perf() < 0)
+ return -1;
+
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 17.11] test/rwlock: benchmark on all available cores
2019-07-25 6:50 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 17.11] test/rwlock: benchmark on all available cores Joyce Kong
@ 2019-08-02 0:04 ` Yongseok Koh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yongseok Koh @ 2019-08-02 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joyce Kong; +Cc: stable, nd
> On Jul 24, 2019, at 11:50 PM, Joyce Kong <Joyce.Kong@arm.com> wrote:
>
> [ backported from upstream commit fe252fb695efa9deb95f2e6b7baf6f805996a5b0 ]
>
> Add performance test on all available cores to benchmark
> the scaling up performance of rw_lock.
>
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
>
> Suggested-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> ---
applied to stable/17.11
Thanks,
> test/test/test_rwlock.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/test/test/test_rwlock.c b/test/test/test_rwlock.c
> index 08685d3..1f327fe 100644
> --- a/test/test/test_rwlock.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_rwlock.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
>
> static rte_rwlock_t sl;
> static rte_rwlock_t sl_tab[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
> +static rte_atomic32_t synchro;
>
> static int
> test_rwlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
> @@ -94,6 +95,77 @@ test_rwlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static rte_rwlock_t lk = RTE_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
> +static volatile uint64_t rwlock_data;
> +static uint64_t lock_count[RTE_MAX_LCORE] = {0};
> +
> +#define TIME_MS 100
> +#define TEST_RWLOCK_DEBUG 0
> +
> +static int
> +load_loop_fn(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
> +{
> + uint64_t time_diff = 0, begin;
> + uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
> + uint64_t lcount = 0;
> + const unsigned int lcore = rte_lcore_id();
> +
> + /* wait synchro for slaves */
> + if (lcore != rte_get_master_lcore())
> + while (rte_atomic32_read(&synchro) == 0)
> + ;
> +
> + begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
> + while (time_diff < hz * TIME_MS / 1000) {
> + rte_rwlock_write_lock(&lk);
> + ++rwlock_data;
> + rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&lk);
> +
> + rte_rwlock_read_lock(&lk);
> + if (TEST_RWLOCK_DEBUG && !(lcount % 100))
> + printf("Core [%u] rwlock_data = %"PRIu64"\n",
> + lcore, rwlock_data);
> + rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&lk);
> +
> + lcount++;
> + /* delay to make lock duty cycle slightly realistic */
> + rte_pause();
> + time_diff = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
> + }
> +
> + lock_count[lcore] = lcount;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +test_rwlock_perf(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + uint64_t total = 0;
> +
> + printf("\nRwlock Perf Test on %u cores...\n", rte_lcore_count());
> +
> + /* clear synchro and start slaves */
> + rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 0);
> + if (rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(load_loop_fn, NULL, SKIP_MASTER) < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* start synchro and launch test on master */
> + rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 1);
> + load_loop_fn(NULL);
> +
> + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
> +
> + RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(i) {
> + printf("Core [%u] count = %"PRIu64"\n", i, lock_count[i]);
> + total += lock_count[i];
> + }
> +
> + printf("Total count = %"PRIu64"\n", total);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int
> test_rwlock(void)
> {
> @@ -124,6 +196,9 @@ test_rwlock(void)
>
> rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
>
> + if (test_rwlock_perf() < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-02 0:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-25 6:50 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 17.11] test/rwlock: benchmark on all available cores Joyce Kong
2019-08-02 0:04 ` Yongseok Koh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).