patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
       [not found] ` <20210330080013.6922-1-rasland@nvidia.com>
@ 2021-03-30  8:00   ` Raslan Darawsheh
  2021-04-01 16:54     ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Raslan Darawsheh @ 2021-03-30  8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev
  Cc: ferruh.yigit, orika, andrew.rybchenko, ivan.malov, ying.a.wang,
	olivier.matz, viacheslavo, shirik, stable

qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
(Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
(QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30

This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.

note: changing the default mask would cause different
patterns generated by testpmd.

Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
---
 doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  3 ++-
 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and their attributes, if any.
 - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
 
   - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
-  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
+
+  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
 
 - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
 
diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
index 6cc57136ac..1eb9711707 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <rte_arp.h>
 #include <rte_common.h>
 #include <rte_ether.h>
+#include <rte_gtp.h>
 #include <rte_icmp.h>
 #include <rte_ip.h>
 #include <rte_sctp.h>
@@ -1421,16 +1422,27 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
  *
  * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
  */
+RTE_STD_C11
 struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
-	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
-	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
+	union {
+		struct {
+			/*
+			 * These fields are retained for compatibility.
+			 * Please switch to the new header field below.
+			 */
+			uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
+			uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
+
+		};
+		struct rte_gtp_psc gtp_psc;
+	};
 };
 
 /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
 #ifndef __cplusplus
 static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
 rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
-	.qfi = 0x3f,
+	.qfi = 0xff,
 };
 #endif
 
-- 
2.29.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
  2021-03-30  8:00   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition Raslan Darawsheh
@ 2021-04-01 16:54     ` Ferruh Yigit
  2021-04-04  7:18       ` Raslan Darawsheh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-01 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raslan Darawsheh, dev
  Cc: orika, andrew.rybchenko, ivan.malov, ying.a.wang, olivier.matz,
	viacheslavo, shirik, stable

On 3/30/2021 9:00 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> (QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30
> 
> This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> 
> note: changing the default mask would cause different
> patterns generated by testpmd.
> 
> Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  3 ++-
>   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and their attributes, if any.
>   - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
>   
>     - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> +
> +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
>   
>   - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
>   
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> index 6cc57136ac..1eb9711707 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>   #include <rte_arp.h>
>   #include <rte_common.h>
>   #include <rte_ether.h>
> +#include <rte_gtp.h>
>   #include <rte_icmp.h>
>   #include <rte_ip.h>
>   #include <rte_sctp.h>
> @@ -1421,16 +1422,27 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
>    *
>    * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
>    */
> +RTE_STD_C11
>   struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
> -	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> +	union {
> +		struct {
> +			/*
> +			 * These fields are retained for compatibility.
> +			 * Please switch to the new header field below.
> +			 */
> +			uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> +			uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> +
> +		};
> +		struct rte_gtp_psc gtp_psc;

Again for consistency, what do you think to rename the variable as 'hdr'?

> +	};
>   };
>   
>   /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
>   #ifndef __cplusplus
>   static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
>   rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
> -	.qfi = 0x3f,
> +	.qfi = 0xff,

Since the protocol header is the preferred way, (individual fields may be 
deprecated in the future), can you please switch to new field, like:
  .gtp_psc.qfi = 0xff,

>   };
>   #endif
>   
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
  2021-04-01 16:54     ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2021-04-04  7:18       ` Raslan Darawsheh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Raslan Darawsheh @ 2021-04-04  7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ferruh Yigit, dev
  Cc: Ori Kam, andrew.rybchenko, ivan.malov, ying.a.wang, olivier.matz,
	Slava Ovsiienko, Shiri Kuzin, stable

Hi Ferruh,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 7:54 PM
> To: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru;
> ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru; ying.a.wang@intel.com; olivier.matz@6wind.com;
> Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Shiri Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
> 
> On 3/30/2021 9:00 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> > qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> > PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> > (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> > (QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30
> >
> > This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> > to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> >
> > note: changing the default mask would cause different
> > patterns generated by testpmd.
> >
> > Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> > Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  3 ++-
> >   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> >   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and
> their attributes, if any.
> >   - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> >
> >     - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> > -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> > +
> > +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
> >
> >   - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > index 6cc57136ac..1eb9711707 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >   #include <rte_arp.h>
> >   #include <rte_common.h>
> >   #include <rte_ether.h>
> > +#include <rte_gtp.h>
> >   #include <rte_icmp.h>
> >   #include <rte_ip.h>
> >   #include <rte_sctp.h>
> > @@ -1421,16 +1422,27 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta
> rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
> >    *
> >    * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> >    */
> > +RTE_STD_C11
> >   struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
> > -	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> > +	union {
> > +		struct {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * These fields are retained for compatibility.
> > +			 * Please switch to the new header field below.
> > +			 */
> > +			uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > +			uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> > +
> > +		};
> > +		struct rte_gtp_psc gtp_psc;
> 
> Again for consistency, what do you think to rename the variable as 'hdr'?
Will do,
> 
> > +	};
> >   };
> >
> >   /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
> >   #ifndef __cplusplus
> >   static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
> >   rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
> > -	.qfi = 0x3f,
> > +	.qfi = 0xff,
> 
> Since the protocol header is the preferred way, (individual fields may be
> deprecated in the future), can you please switch to new field, like:
Yes, will do it accordingly
>   .gtp_psc.qfi = 0xff,
> 
> >   };
> >   #endif
> >
> >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
       [not found] ` <20210404074552.24190-1-rasland@nvidia.com>
@ 2021-04-04  7:45   ` Raslan Darawsheh
  2021-04-06 16:09     ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Raslan Darawsheh @ 2021-04-04  7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev, ferruh.yigit
  Cc: orika, andrew.rybchenko, ivan.malov, ying.a.wang, olivier.matz,
	viacheslavo, shirik, stable

qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
(Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
(QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30

This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.

note: changing the default mask would cause different
patterns generated by testpmd.

Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
---
 doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  3 ++-
 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and their attributes, if any.
 - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
 
   - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
-  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
+
+  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
 
 - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
 
diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
index 6cc57136ac..20b4389429 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <rte_arp.h>
 #include <rte_common.h>
 #include <rte_ether.h>
+#include <rte_gtp.h>
 #include <rte_icmp.h>
 #include <rte_ip.h>
 #include <rte_sctp.h>
@@ -1421,16 +1422,29 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
  *
  * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
  */
+RTE_STD_C11
 struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
-	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
-	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
+	union {
+		struct {
+			/*
+			 * These fields are retained for compatibility.
+			 * Please switch to the new header field below.
+			 */
+			uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
+			uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
+
+		};
+		struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr hdr;
+	};
 };
 
 /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
 #ifndef __cplusplus
 static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
 rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
-	.qfi = 0x3f,
+	.hdr.ppp = 1,
+	.hdr.rqi = 1,
+	.hdr.qfi = 0x3f,
 };
 #endif
 
-- 
2.29.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
  2021-04-04  7:45   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 " Raslan Darawsheh
@ 2021-04-06 16:09     ` Ferruh Yigit
  2021-04-13  8:14       ` Raslan Darawsheh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-06 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raslan Darawsheh, dev, orika, andrew.rybchenko
  Cc: ivan.malov, ying.a.wang, olivier.matz, viacheslavo, shirik,
	stable, David Marchand, Thomas Monjalon

On 4/4/2021 8:45 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> (QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30
> 
> This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> 
> note: changing the default mask would cause different
> patterns generated by testpmd.
> 
> Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  3 ++-
>   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and their attributes, if any.
>   - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
>   
>     - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> +
> +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
>   
>   - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
>   
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> index 6cc57136ac..20b4389429 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>   #include <rte_arp.h>
>   #include <rte_common.h>
>   #include <rte_ether.h>
> +#include <rte_gtp.h>
>   #include <rte_icmp.h>
>   #include <rte_ip.h>
>   #include <rte_sctp.h>
> @@ -1421,16 +1422,29 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
>    *
>    * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
>    */
> +RTE_STD_C11
>   struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
> -	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> +	union {
> +		struct {
> +			/*
> +			 * These fields are retained for compatibility.
> +			 * Please switch to the new header field below.
> +			 */
> +			uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> +			uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> +
> +		};
> +		struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr hdr;
> +	};
>   };

This will change the struct size even with union, since old version is missing 
all fields from protocol header. Struct size will go from 2 --> 5 bytes [1].

Since this is public struct, we can't change its size.

@Ori, Andrew,

Do you have a suggestion for next step?

- We can still add the "struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr", and add a deprecation notice 
for "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc" to say it will use  "struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr" 
on 21.11.

- And for this release use the Raslan's first version:
   -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
   +	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */


Does it make sense? Any comments?



[1]
struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr {
         uint8_t                    ext_hdr_len;          /*     0     1 */
         uint8_t                    type:4;               /*     1: 0  1 */
         uint8_t                    qmp:1;                /*     1: 4  1 */

         /* XXX 3 bits hole, try to pack */

         union {
                 struct {
                         uint8_t    snp:1;                /*     2: 0  1 */
                         uint8_t    spare_dl1:2;          /*     2: 1  1 */
                 };                                       /*     2     1 */
                 struct {
                         uint8_t    dl_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 0  1 */
                         uint8_t    ul_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 1  1 */
                         uint8_t    snp_ul1:1;            /*     2: 2  1 */
                 };                                       /*     2     1 */
         };                                               /*     2     1 */
         union {
                 struct {
                         uint8_t    ppp:1;                /*     3: 0  1 */
                         uint8_t    rqi:1;                /*     3: 1  1 */
                 };                                       /*     3     1 */
                 struct {
                         uint8_t    n_delay_ind:1;        /*     3: 0  1 */
                         uint8_t    spare_ul2:1;          /*     3: 1  1 */
                 };                                       /*     3     1 */
         };                                               /*     3     1 */
         uint8_t                    qfi:6;                /*     4: 0  1 */

         /* XXX 2 bits hole, try to pack */

         uint8_t                    data[];               /*     5     0 */

         /* size: 5, cachelines: 1, members: 7 */
         /* sum members: 3 */
         /* sum bitfield members: 11 bits, bit holes: 2, sum bit holes: 5 bits */
         /* last cacheline: 5 bytes */
};

>   
>   /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
>   #ifndef __cplusplus
>   static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
>   rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
> -	.qfi = 0x3f,
> +	.hdr.ppp = 1,
> +	.hdr.rqi = 1,
> +	.hdr.qfi = 0x3f,
>   };
>   #endif
>   
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
  2021-04-06 16:09     ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2021-04-13  8:14       ` Raslan Darawsheh
  2021-04-13  9:24         ` Ori Kam
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Raslan Darawsheh @ 2021-04-13  8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ferruh Yigit, dev, Ori Kam, andrew.rybchenko
  Cc: ivan.malov, ying.a.wang, olivier.matz, Slava Ovsiienko,
	Shiri Kuzin, stable, David Marchand, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:10 PM
> To: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
> <orika@nvidia.com>; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> Cc: ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru; ying.a.wang@intel.com;
> olivier.matz@6wind.com; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Shiri
> Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org; David Marchand
> <david.marchand@redhat.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
> 
> On 4/4/2021 8:45 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> > qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> > PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> > (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> > (QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30
> >
> > This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> > to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> >
> > note: changing the default mask would cause different
> > patterns generated by testpmd.
> >
> > Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> > Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  3 ++-
> >   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> >   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and
> their attributes, if any.
> >   - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> >
> >     - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> > -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> > +
> > +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
> >
> >   - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > index 6cc57136ac..20b4389429 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >   #include <rte_arp.h>
> >   #include <rte_common.h>
> >   #include <rte_ether.h>
> > +#include <rte_gtp.h>
> >   #include <rte_icmp.h>
> >   #include <rte_ip.h>
> >   #include <rte_sctp.h>
> > @@ -1421,16 +1422,29 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta
> rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
> >    *
> >    * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> >    */
> > +RTE_STD_C11
> >   struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
> > -	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> > +	union {
> > +		struct {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * These fields are retained for compatibility.
> > +			 * Please switch to the new header field below.
> > +			 */
> > +			uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > +			uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> > +
> > +		};
> > +		struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr hdr;
> > +	};
> >   };
> 
> This will change the struct size even with union, since old version is missing
> all fields from protocol header. Struct size will go from 2 --> 5 bytes [1].
> 
> Since this is public struct, we can't change its size.
> 
> @Ori, Andrew,
> 
> Do you have a suggestion for next step?
> 
> - We can still add the "struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr", and add a deprecation notice
> for "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc" to say it will use  "struct
> rte_gtp_psc_hdr"
> on 21.11.
> 
> - And for this release use the Raslan's first version:
>    -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
>    +	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> 
> 
> Does it make sense? Any comments?
> 
@Ori Kam, @andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, 
This is a kind remainder of this patch, 

> 
> 
> [1]
> struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr {
>          uint8_t                    ext_hdr_len;          /*     0     1 */
>          uint8_t                    type:4;               /*     1: 0  1 */
>          uint8_t                    qmp:1;                /*     1: 4  1 */
> 
>          /* XXX 3 bits hole, try to pack */
> 
>          union {
>                  struct {
>                          uint8_t    snp:1;                /*     2: 0  1 */
>                          uint8_t    spare_dl1:2;          /*     2: 1  1 */
>                  };                                       /*     2     1 */
>                  struct {
>                          uint8_t    dl_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 0  1 */
>                          uint8_t    ul_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 1  1 */
>                          uint8_t    snp_ul1:1;            /*     2: 2  1 */
>                  };                                       /*     2     1 */
>          };                                               /*     2     1 */
>          union {
>                  struct {
>                          uint8_t    ppp:1;                /*     3: 0  1 */
>                          uint8_t    rqi:1;                /*     3: 1  1 */
>                  };                                       /*     3     1 */
>                  struct {
>                          uint8_t    n_delay_ind:1;        /*     3: 0  1 */
>                          uint8_t    spare_ul2:1;          /*     3: 1  1 */
>                  };                                       /*     3     1 */
>          };                                               /*     3     1 */
>          uint8_t                    qfi:6;                /*     4: 0  1 */
> 
>          /* XXX 2 bits hole, try to pack */
> 
>          uint8_t                    data[];               /*     5     0 */
> 
>          /* size: 5, cachelines: 1, members: 7 */
>          /* sum members: 3 */
>          /* sum bitfield members: 11 bits, bit holes: 2, sum bit holes: 5 bits */
>          /* last cacheline: 5 bytes */
> };
> 
> >
> >   /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
> >   #ifndef __cplusplus
> >   static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
> >   rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
> > -	.qfi = 0x3f,
> > +	.hdr.ppp = 1,
> > +	.hdr.rqi = 1,
> > +	.hdr.qfi = 0x3f,
> >   };
> >   #endif
> >
> >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
  2021-04-13  8:14       ` Raslan Darawsheh
@ 2021-04-13  9:24         ` Ori Kam
  2021-04-14 12:16           ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ori Kam @ 2021-04-13  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raslan Darawsheh, Ferruh Yigit, dev, andrew.rybchenko
  Cc: ivan.malov, ying.a.wang, olivier.matz, Slava Ovsiienko,
	Shiri Kuzin, stable, David Marchand, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon

Hi Raslan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:10 PM
> > To: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
> > <orika@nvidia.com>; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> > Cc: ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru; ying.a.wang@intel.com;
> > olivier.matz@6wind.com; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Shiri
> > Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org; David Marchand
> > <david.marchand@redhat.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> > <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
> >
> > On 4/4/2021 8:45 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> > > qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> > > PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> > > (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> > > (QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30
> > >
> > > This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> > > to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> > >
> > > note: changing the default mask would cause different
> > > patterns generated by testpmd.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> > > Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > >   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  3 ++-
> > >   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> > >   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > > index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > > @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and
> > their attributes, if any.
> > >   - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> > >
> > >     - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> > > -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> > > +
> > > +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
> > >
> > >   - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > index 6cc57136ac..20b4389429 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > >   #include <rte_arp.h>
> > >   #include <rte_common.h>
> > >   #include <rte_ether.h>
> > > +#include <rte_gtp.h>
> > >   #include <rte_icmp.h>
> > >   #include <rte_ip.h>
> > >   #include <rte_sctp.h>
> > > @@ -1421,16 +1422,29 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta
> > rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
> > >    *
> > >    * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> > >    */
> > > +RTE_STD_C11
> > >   struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
> > > -	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > > -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> > > +	union {
> > > +		struct {
> > > +			/*
> > > +			 * These fields are retained for compatibility.
> > > +			 * Please switch to the new header field below.
> > > +			 */
> > > +			uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > > +			uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> > > +
> > > +		};
> > > +		struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr hdr;
> > > +	};
> > >   };
> >
> > This will change the struct size even with union, since old version is missing
> > all fields from protocol header. Struct size will go from 2 --> 5 bytes [1].
> >
> > Since this is public struct, we can't change its size.
> >
> > @Ori, Andrew,
> >
> > Do you have a suggestion for next step?
> >

I think Ferruh is right, and I think that we should at this point just update the documentation.
Sorry for the detour 
Just small comment about the original  patch.
I don’t think you should change the default mask since it may break existing apps.

> > - We can still add the "struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr", and add a deprecation notice
> > for "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc" to say it will use  "struct
> > rte_gtp_psc_hdr"
> > on 21.11.
> >
> > - And for this release use the Raslan's first version:
> >    -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> >    +	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> >
> >
> > Does it make sense? Any comments?
> >
> @Ori Kam, @andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
> This is a kind remainder of this patch,
> 
> >
> >
> > [1]
> > struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr {
> >          uint8_t                    ext_hdr_len;          /*     0     1 */
> >          uint8_t                    type:4;               /*     1: 0  1 */
> >          uint8_t                    qmp:1;                /*     1: 4  1 */
> >
> >          /* XXX 3 bits hole, try to pack */
> >
> >          union {
> >                  struct {
> >                          uint8_t    snp:1;                /*     2: 0  1 */
> >                          uint8_t    spare_dl1:2;          /*     2: 1  1 */
> >                  };                                       /*     2     1 */
> >                  struct {
> >                          uint8_t    dl_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 0  1 */
> >                          uint8_t    ul_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 1  1 */
> >                          uint8_t    snp_ul1:1;            /*     2: 2  1 */
> >                  };                                       /*     2     1 */
> >          };                                               /*     2     1 */
> >          union {
> >                  struct {
> >                          uint8_t    ppp:1;                /*     3: 0  1 */
> >                          uint8_t    rqi:1;                /*     3: 1  1 */
> >                  };                                       /*     3     1 */
> >                  struct {
> >                          uint8_t    n_delay_ind:1;        /*     3: 0  1 */
> >                          uint8_t    spare_ul2:1;          /*     3: 1  1 */
> >                  };                                       /*     3     1 */
> >          };                                               /*     3     1 */
> >          uint8_t                    qfi:6;                /*     4: 0  1 */
> >
> >          /* XXX 2 bits hole, try to pack */
> >
> >          uint8_t                    data[];               /*     5     0 */
> >
> >          /* size: 5, cachelines: 1, members: 7 */
> >          /* sum members: 3 */
> >          /* sum bitfield members: 11 bits, bit holes: 2, sum bit holes: 5 bits */
> >          /* last cacheline: 5 bytes */
> > };
> >
> > >
> > >   /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
> > >   #ifndef __cplusplus
> > >   static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
> > >   rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
> > > -	.qfi = 0x3f,
> > > +	.hdr.ppp = 1,
> > > +	.hdr.rqi = 1,
> > > +	.hdr.qfi = 0x3f,
> > >   };
> > >   #endif
> > >
> > >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
  2021-04-13  9:24         ` Ori Kam
@ 2021-04-14 12:16           ` Ferruh Yigit
  2021-04-15  6:33             ` Raslan Darawsheh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-14 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ori Kam, Raslan Darawsheh, dev, andrew.rybchenko
  Cc: ivan.malov, ying.a.wang, olivier.matz, Slava Ovsiienko,
	Shiri Kuzin, stable, David Marchand, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon

On 4/13/2021 10:24 AM, Ori Kam wrote:
> Hi Raslan,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:10 PM
>>> To: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
>>> <orika@nvidia.com>; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
>>> Cc: ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru; ying.a.wang@intel.com;
>>> olivier.matz@6wind.com; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Shiri
>>> Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org; David Marchand
>>> <david.marchand@redhat.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
>>> <thomas@monjalon.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
>>>
>>> On 4/4/2021 8:45 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
>>>> qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
>>>> PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
>>>> (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
>>>> (QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30
>>>>
>>>> This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
>>>> to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
>>>>
>>>> note: changing the default mask would cause different
>>>> patterns generated by testpmd.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
>>>> Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  3 ++-
>>>>    lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>>>>    2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
>>>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and
>>> their attributes, if any.
>>>>    - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
>>>>
>>>>      - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
>>>> -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
>>>> +
>>>> +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
>>>>
>>>>    - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>>> index 6cc57136ac..20b4389429 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>>>>    #include <rte_arp.h>
>>>>    #include <rte_common.h>
>>>>    #include <rte_ether.h>
>>>> +#include <rte_gtp.h>
>>>>    #include <rte_icmp.h>
>>>>    #include <rte_ip.h>
>>>>    #include <rte_sctp.h>
>>>> @@ -1421,16 +1422,29 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta
>>> rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
>>>>     *
>>>>     * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
>>>>     */
>>>> +RTE_STD_C11
>>>>    struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
>>>> -	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
>>>> -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
>>>> +	union {
>>>> +		struct {
>>>> +			/*
>>>> +			 * These fields are retained for compatibility.
>>>> +			 * Please switch to the new header field below.
>>>> +			 */
>>>> +			uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
>>>> +			uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
>>>> +
>>>> +		};
>>>> +		struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr hdr;
>>>> +	};
>>>>    };
>>>
>>> This will change the struct size even with union, since old version is missing
>>> all fields from protocol header. Struct size will go from 2 --> 5 bytes [1].
>>>
>>> Since this is public struct, we can't change its size.
>>>
>>> @Ori, Andrew,
>>>
>>> Do you have a suggestion for next step?
>>>
> 
> I think Ferruh is right, and I think that we should at this point just update the documentation.
> Sorry for the detour
> Just small comment about the original  patch.
> I don’t think you should change the default mask since it may break existing apps.
> 

I will continue with first patch [1], and will update the protocol reference in 
the commit log.

Meanwhile adding 'struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr' (patch v4 1/2) work can continue 
separately.
And when it is added we can send a deprecation notice to update 'struct 
rte_flow_item_gtp_psc' and finally update it on v21.11 to have 'struct 
rte_gtp_psc_hdr' in it. Makes sense?

[1]
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210323121134.19113-1-rasland@nvidia.com/

>>> - We can still add the "struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr", and add a deprecation notice
>>> for "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc" to say it will use  "struct
>>> rte_gtp_psc_hdr"
>>> on 21.11.
>>>
>>> - And for this release use the Raslan's first version:
>>>     -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
>>>     +	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
>>>
>>>
>>> Does it make sense? Any comments?
>>>
>> @Ori Kam, @andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
>> This is a kind remainder of this patch,
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr {
>>>           uint8_t                    ext_hdr_len;          /*     0     1 */
>>>           uint8_t                    type:4;               /*     1: 0  1 */
>>>           uint8_t                    qmp:1;                /*     1: 4  1 */
>>>
>>>           /* XXX 3 bits hole, try to pack */
>>>
>>>           union {
>>>                   struct {
>>>                           uint8_t    snp:1;                /*     2: 0  1 */
>>>                           uint8_t    spare_dl1:2;          /*     2: 1  1 */
>>>                   };                                       /*     2     1 */
>>>                   struct {
>>>                           uint8_t    dl_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 0  1 */
>>>                           uint8_t    ul_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 1  1 */
>>>                           uint8_t    snp_ul1:1;            /*     2: 2  1 */
>>>                   };                                       /*     2     1 */
>>>           };                                               /*     2     1 */
>>>           union {
>>>                   struct {
>>>                           uint8_t    ppp:1;                /*     3: 0  1 */
>>>                           uint8_t    rqi:1;                /*     3: 1  1 */
>>>                   };                                       /*     3     1 */
>>>                   struct {
>>>                           uint8_t    n_delay_ind:1;        /*     3: 0  1 */
>>>                           uint8_t    spare_ul2:1;          /*     3: 1  1 */
>>>                   };                                       /*     3     1 */
>>>           };                                               /*     3     1 */
>>>           uint8_t                    qfi:6;                /*     4: 0  1 */
>>>
>>>           /* XXX 2 bits hole, try to pack */
>>>
>>>           uint8_t                    data[];               /*     5     0 */
>>>
>>>           /* size: 5, cachelines: 1, members: 7 */
>>>           /* sum members: 3 */
>>>           /* sum bitfield members: 11 bits, bit holes: 2, sum bit holes: 5 bits */
>>>           /* last cacheline: 5 bytes */
>>> };
>>>
>>>>
>>>>    /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
>>>>    #ifndef __cplusplus
>>>>    static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
>>>>    rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
>>>> -	.qfi = 0x3f,
>>>> +	.hdr.ppp = 1,
>>>> +	.hdr.rqi = 1,
>>>> +	.hdr.qfi = 0x3f,
>>>>    };
>>>>    #endif
>>>>
>>>>
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
  2021-04-14 12:16           ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2021-04-15  6:33             ` Raslan Darawsheh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Raslan Darawsheh @ 2021-04-15  6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ferruh Yigit, Ori Kam, dev, andrew.rybchenko
  Cc: ivan.malov, ying.a.wang, olivier.matz, Slava Ovsiienko,
	Shiri Kuzin, stable, David Marchand, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon



Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 3:17 PM
> To: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>;
> dev@dpdk.org; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> Cc: ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru; ying.a.wang@intel.com;
> olivier.matz@6wind.com; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Shiri
> Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org; David Marchand
> <david.marchand@redhat.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
> 
> On 4/13/2021 10:24 AM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > Hi Raslan,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:10 PM
> >>> To: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
> >>> <orika@nvidia.com>; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> >>> Cc: ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru; ying.a.wang@intel.com;
> >>> olivier.matz@6wind.com; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>;
> Shiri
> >>> Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org; David Marchand
> >>> <david.marchand@redhat.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> >>> <thomas@monjalon.net>
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
> >>>
> >>> On 4/4/2021 8:45 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> >>>> qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> >>>> PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> >>>> (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> >>>> (QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30
> >>>>
> >>>> This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> >>>> to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> >>>>
> >>>> note: changing the default mask would cause different
> >>>> patterns generated by testpmd.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> >>>> Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> >>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  3 ++-
> >>>>    lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> >>>>    2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> >>> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> >>>> index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> >>>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> >>>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> >>>> @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and
> >>> their attributes, if any.
> >>>>    - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> >>>>
> >>>>      - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> >>>> -  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> >>>> +
> >>>> +  - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
> >>>>
> >>>>    - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> >>>> index 6cc57136ac..20b4389429 100644
> >>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> >>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> >>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >>>>    #include <rte_arp.h>
> >>>>    #include <rte_common.h>
> >>>>    #include <rte_ether.h>
> >>>> +#include <rte_gtp.h>
> >>>>    #include <rte_icmp.h>
> >>>>    #include <rte_ip.h>
> >>>>    #include <rte_sctp.h>
> >>>> @@ -1421,16 +1422,29 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta
> >>> rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
> >>>>     *
> >>>>     * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> >>>>     */
> >>>> +RTE_STD_C11
> >>>>    struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
> >>>> -	uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> >>>> -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> >>>> +	union {
> >>>> +		struct {
> >>>> +			/*
> >>>> +			 * These fields are retained for compatibility.
> >>>> +			 * Please switch to the new header field below.
> >>>> +			 */
> >>>> +			uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> >>>> +			uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> >>>> +
> >>>> +		};
> >>>> +		struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr hdr;
> >>>> +	};
> >>>>    };
> >>>
> >>> This will change the struct size even with union, since old version is
> missing
> >>> all fields from protocol header. Struct size will go from 2 --> 5 bytes [1].
> >>>
> >>> Since this is public struct, we can't change its size.
> >>>
> >>> @Ori, Andrew,
> >>>
> >>> Do you have a suggestion for next step?
> >>>
> >
> > I think Ferruh is right, and I think that we should at this point just update
> the documentation.
> > Sorry for the detour
> > Just small comment about the original  patch.
> > I don't think you should change the default mask since it may break existing
> apps.
> >
> 
> I will continue with first patch [1], and will update the protocol reference in
> the commit log.
> 
> Meanwhile adding 'struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr' (patch v4 1/2) work can continue
> separately.
> And when it is added we can send a deprecation notice to update 'struct
> rte_flow_item_gtp_psc' and finally update it on v21.11 to have 'struct
> rte_gtp_psc_hdr' in it. Makes sense?
> 
Yes, makes sense to me, 
I'll work in the meanwhile on providing the new hdrs definition .

> [1]
> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210323121134.19113-1-
> rasland@nvidia.com/
> 
> >>> - We can still add the "struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr", and add a deprecation
> notice
> >>> for "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc" to say it will use  "struct
> >>> rte_gtp_psc_hdr"
> >>> on 21.11.
> >>>
> >>> - And for this release use the Raslan's first version:
> >>>     -	uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> >>>     +	uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Does it make sense? Any comments?
> >>>
> >> @Ori Kam, @andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
> >> This is a kind remainder of this patch,
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>> struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr {
> >>>           uint8_t                    ext_hdr_len;          /*     0     1 */
> >>>           uint8_t                    type:4;               /*     1: 0  1 */
> >>>           uint8_t                    qmp:1;                /*     1: 4  1 */
> >>>
> >>>           /* XXX 3 bits hole, try to pack */
> >>>
> >>>           union {
> >>>                   struct {
> >>>                           uint8_t    snp:1;                /*     2: 0  1 */
> >>>                           uint8_t    spare_dl1:2;          /*     2: 1  1 */
> >>>                   };                                       /*     2     1 */
> >>>                   struct {
> >>>                           uint8_t    dl_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 0  1 */
> >>>                           uint8_t    ul_delay_ind:1;       /*     2: 1  1 */
> >>>                           uint8_t    snp_ul1:1;            /*     2: 2  1 */
> >>>                   };                                       /*     2     1 */
> >>>           };                                               /*     2     1 */
> >>>           union {
> >>>                   struct {
> >>>                           uint8_t    ppp:1;                /*     3: 0  1 */
> >>>                           uint8_t    rqi:1;                /*     3: 1  1 */
> >>>                   };                                       /*     3     1 */
> >>>                   struct {
> >>>                           uint8_t    n_delay_ind:1;        /*     3: 0  1 */
> >>>                           uint8_t    spare_ul2:1;          /*     3: 1  1 */
> >>>                   };                                       /*     3     1 */
> >>>           };                                               /*     3     1 */
> >>>           uint8_t                    qfi:6;                /*     4: 0  1 */
> >>>
> >>>           /* XXX 2 bits hole, try to pack */
> >>>
> >>>           uint8_t                    data[];               /*     5     0 */
> >>>
> >>>           /* size: 5, cachelines: 1, members: 7 */
> >>>           /* sum members: 3 */
> >>>           /* sum bitfield members: 11 bits, bit holes: 2, sum bit holes: 5 bits
> */
> >>>           /* last cacheline: 5 bytes */
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>    /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
> >>>>    #ifndef __cplusplus
> >>>>    static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
> >>>>    rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
> >>>> -	.qfi = 0x3f,
> >>>> +	.hdr.ppp = 1,
> >>>> +	.hdr.rqi = 1,
> >>>> +	.hdr.qfi = 0x3f,
> >>>>    };
> >>>>    #endif
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-15  6:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20210330075036.6579-2-rasland@nvidia.com>
     [not found] ` <20210330080013.6922-1-rasland@nvidia.com>
2021-03-30  8:00   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition Raslan Darawsheh
2021-04-01 16:54     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-04  7:18       ` Raslan Darawsheh
     [not found] ` <20210404074552.24190-1-rasland@nvidia.com>
2021-04-04  7:45   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 " Raslan Darawsheh
2021-04-06 16:09     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-13  8:14       ` Raslan Darawsheh
2021-04-13  9:24         ` Ori Kam
2021-04-14 12:16           ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-15  6:33             ` Raslan Darawsheh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).