patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
To: "Pei, Andy" <andy.pei@intel.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"Ma, WenwuX" <wenwux.ma@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu.hu@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Yinan" <yinan.wang@intel.com>,
	"He, Xingguang" <xingguang.he@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] vhost: fix deadlock when message handling failed
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:14:11 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB350427A668BB2ED82DFBAB379C879@SN6PR11MB3504.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR11MB17399D1937A61D7AEB2B72AB8F879@DM5PR11MB1739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Andy,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pei, Andy <andy.pei@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 5:03 PM
> To: Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; Ma, WenwuX <wenwux.ma@intel.com>;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan <yinan.wang@intel.com>; He,
> Xingguang <xingguang.he@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] vhost: fix deadlock when message handling failed
> 
> HI Chenbo,
> 
> See below example
> 
> 1.
> 	ret = read_vhost_message(dev, fd, &ctx);
> 	if (ret <= 0) {
> 		if (ret < 0)
> 			VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(dev->ifname, ERR, "vhost read message
> failed\n");
> 		else
> 			VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(dev->ifname, INFO, "vhost peer
> closed\n");
> 
> 		return -1;
> 	}
> 
> 2.
> 	ret = vhost_user_check_and_alloc_queue_pair(dev, &ctx);
> 	if (ret < 0) {
> 		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(dev->ifname, ERR, "failed to alloc queue\n");
> 		return -1;
> 	}
> 
> 
> 3. ret = -1
> 	} else if (ret == RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR) {
> 		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(dev->ifname, ERR, "vhost message handling
> failed.\n");
> 		ret = -1;
> 		goto unlock;
> 	}
> 
> I mean ret is used to check the function is returned successfully or not
> while it is also used to store vhost msg return code like
> "RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_XXX".

It makes sense to make it two, one int for return value, one enum
rte_vhost_msg_result only for message handling. IMHO, this could improve 
readability.

Thanks,
Chenbo

> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 4:54 PM
> > To: Pei, Andy <andy.pei@intel.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> > <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; Ma, WenwuX <wenwux.ma@intel.com>;
> > dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan <yinan.wang@intel.com>;
> He,
> > Xingguang <xingguang.he@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] vhost: fix deadlock when message handling failed
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pei, Andy <andy.pei@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 4:42 PM
> > > To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; Ma, WenwuX
> > > <wenwux.ma@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>;
> > > dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan
> > > <yinan.wang@intel.com>; He, Xingguang <xingguang.he@intel.com>;
> > > stable@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] vhost: fix deadlock when message handling
> > > failed
> > >
> > > HI ALL,
> > >
> > > I see that in function vhost_user_msg_handler.
> > > We use "ret" to store both vhost msg return code like
> > > "RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_XXX" and function return value.
> > > I wonder if it is better to use two different variable to make it easy
> > > to read.
> >
> > By saying 'function return value', you mean which function? Can you
> elaborate
> > more?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chenbo
> >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 9:24 PM
> > > > To: Ma, WenwuX <WenwuX.Ma@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo
> > > > <Chenbo.Xia@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > > > Cc: Hu, Jiayu <Jiayu.Hu@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan
> > > > <yinan.wang@intel.com>;
> > > He,
> > > > Xingguang <xingguang.he@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vhost: fix deadlock when message handling
> > > > failed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/7/22 15:27, Wenwu Ma wrote:
> > > > > In vhost_user_msg_handler(), if vhost message handling failed, we
> > > > > should check whether the queue is locked and release the lock
> > > > > before returning. Or, it will cause a deadlock later.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 7f31d4ea05ca ("vhost: fix lock on device readiness
> > > > > notification")
> > > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wenwu Ma <wenwux.ma@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 10 ++++++----
> > > > >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Applied to dpdk-next-virtio/main.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Maxime


      reply	other threads:[~2022-07-11  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220505134008.2865-1-wenwux.ma@intel.com>
2022-05-05 16:17 ` [PATCH v2] vhost: fix deadlock when handling user messages Wenwu Ma
2022-05-06  8:19   ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-05-07 13:27 ` [PATCH v3] vhost: fix deadlock when message handling failed Wenwu Ma
2022-05-07  6:02   ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-05-09  3:13   ` Ling, WeiX
2022-05-17 13:15   ` David Marchand
2022-05-17 13:24   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-07-11  8:42     ` Pei, Andy
2022-07-11  8:54       ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-07-11  9:02         ` Pei, Andy
2022-07-11  9:14           ` Xia, Chenbo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB350427A668BB2ED82DFBAB379C879@SN6PR11MB3504.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=andy.pei@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=wenwux.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=xingguang.he@intel.com \
    --cc=yinan.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

patches for DPDK stable branches

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/0 stable/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 stable stable/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable \
		stable@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index stable

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.stable


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git