[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw104034 [PATCH] net/bonding: fix offloading configuration

[checkpatch@dpdk.org]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/104034

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#57: 
delivered to the slave devices in this way.

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#60: 
the capability of all slave devices. Based on this, the following functions

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#63: 
all the slave devices support this Tx offloading), the enabling status of

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#64: 
the offloading of all slave devices depends on the configuration of the

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#68: 
of the bonding device, the enabling status of the offloading on the slave

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#70: 
on the original configuration of the slave devices.

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#100: FILE: drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c:1719:
+	slave_eth_dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads |=

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#103: FILE: drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c:1722:
+	slave_eth_dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads &=

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#107: FILE: drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c:1726:
+	slave_eth_dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads |=

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'?
#110: FILE: drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c:1729:
+	slave_eth_dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &=

total: 0 errors, 10 warnings, 0 checks, 32 lines checked