DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Fengkai Sun <qcloud1014@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Secondary process cannot call functions on hugepages
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:44:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210720084430.10dc648c@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6YOcPtZqRvkEtTYugjV0LtV-tNd55B4VWq--zePa8p77XoPg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:28:59 +0800
Fengkai Sun <qcloud1014@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi list,
> 
> Recently I read about the multi-process support of dpdk and found the
> feature of keeping the hugepage mappings between primary and secondary
> processes very interesting.
> Therefore, I made the following experiments:
> 
> 1. I modify the glibc to make dlopen() map shared libraries on hugepages.
> This is done by changing the underlying mapping strategy from mmap to pread.
> 2. I allocate a continuous address by rte_malloc(), and instruct dlopen()
> to map a shared library there, let's call it lib1.so.
> 3. After dlopen() succeeds, I use dlsym() in the primary process to locate
> the global variables and functions in lib1.so, and it turns out they are
> correctly mapped and functions can be called without a problem.
> 4. Because hugepage seems to get away with the effect of ASLR, I record the
> address of those global variables and functions in lib1.so, and verify them
> in the secondary process.
>     The secondary can access the global variables at the same address, but
> when it tries to call the function, a segfault occurs.
> 5. I try to use dlopen() with the same arguments as the primary process in
> the secondary process, but it just gives a segfault.
> 
> Unfortunately, gdb also gives a segfault when the program starts up, so I
> cannot give some useful debug info.
> 
> My question is, does dpdk permit functions to be loaded on hugepages and be
> called by multiple functions? Though the two processes see the exact same
> content on the hugepage, the secondary just cannot call the function on it.


Sounds like no-exec bit.
You might want to look into other libraries that already handle huge
pages and libraries such as hugetlbfs



  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-20 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-20  9:28 Fengkai Sun
2021-07-20 15:44 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2021-07-21  2:34   ` Fengkai Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210720084430.10dc648c@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=qcloud1014@gmail.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).