DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-users] QAT VFs using cryptodev - memory requirements
@ 2020-12-03 12:57 Joshi, Venkatesh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Joshi, Venkatesh @ 2020-12-03 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: users


I have a DPDK application running 5 instances on 5 CPUs. I have bound 1 QAT VF to each of the CPUs using cryptodev.

I have allocated only a single instance of the following:
* The crypto op pool using rte_crypto_op_pool_create()
* The symmetric session pool using rte_cryptodev_sym_session_pool_create()

So, the pools will be shared by the 5 cryptodevs. Is this safe to do?

Is there any recommendation on whether each cryptodev instance should have its own memory pools?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-12-03 12:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-03 12:57 [dpdk-users] QAT VFs using cryptodev - memory requirements Joshi, Venkatesh

DPDK usage discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/users/0 users/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 users users/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/users \
	public-inbox-index users

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git