DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen <zain2294@gmail.com>
To: Filip Janiszewski <contact@filipjaniszewski.com>
Cc: users <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] rte_mempool_get returning null
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:48:01 +0500
Message-ID: <CAN7yQ2pEOMKaBrWtqN6BiLbAa9+aXqOH4eCmcNLAOXnBHgPUhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26c96412-1f06-2ad5-6d0e-00a8125dc81e@filipjaniszewski.com>

I am thinking you are also freeing the objects allocated after their use?

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, 6:51 PM Filip Janiszewski <
contact@filipjaniszewski.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> What would be the reason for rte_mempool_get returning null even if
> rte_mempool_avail_count returns a big positive number? I know is
> positive since I've added a print in my code to test that..
>
> I've a strange issue where once I extract N items from the pool (where N
> is the exact size of the pool) then the rte_mempool_get fails even if in
> between the N extraction I've replenished the pool with rte_mempool_put
> so that rte_mempool_avail_count is always positive.
>
> The pool is created like this:
>
>     data_pool_ = rte_mempool_create(
>                      fdo_str_name,
>                      config_->chunk_count,
>                      chunk_size,
>                      0, // cache_size
>                      0, // private_data_size
>                      nullptr, // mp_init
>                      nullptr, // mp_init_arg
>                      nullptr, // obj_init
>                      nullptr, // obj_init_arg
>                      config_->host_socket_id,
>                      0 );
>
> Producer and consumer are running on separate threads, but that should
> not be the issue since the creation flag is 0 (Multi producer/Multi
> consumer). So in my scenario is chunk_count is say 128, then after 128
> GET operations I get null even if I PUT back 128 items before this last
> GET (and again, rte_mempool_avail_count is 128...)
>
> Is weird, since this is happening since I've upgraded to 21.02 from
> 20.02.1, may I have messed up the compilation of the new DPDK? How can I
> investigate this issue?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> BR, Filip
> +48 666 369 823
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-30 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-30 13:50 Filip Janiszewski
2021-06-30 14:48 ` Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen [this message]
2021-06-30 17:04   ` Filip Janiszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAN7yQ2pEOMKaBrWtqN6BiLbAa9+aXqOH4eCmcNLAOXnBHgPUhQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=zain2294@gmail.com \
    --cc=contact@filipjaniszewski.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK usage discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/users/0 users/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 users users/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/users \
		users@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index users

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.users


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git