About rte_flow asynchronous API

About rte_flow asynchronous API

[Junghan Yoon]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 4581 bytes --]

RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

[Bing Zhao]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1799 bytes --]

Hi Junghan,

In testpmd, you can easily do it by:


port stop all

# or port stop 0



flow configure 0 ......

# if there are other port(s)

# flow configure Y ......





port start all

# or port start 0

With the source code implementation, you can configure it before starting a device.

BR. Bing


From: Junghan Yoon <cerotyki@gmail.com<mailto:cerotyki@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 10:57:13 AM
To: users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org> <users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>>
Subject: About rte_flow asynchronous API


Hi.

I'm trying to use testpmd to test rte_flow with asynchronous API in DPDK 22.11.



I turned on dv_esw_en=1 by echoing switchdev to /sys/class/net/...., and set dv_flow_en to 2 to use connectX-6 HWS (hardware steering).

sudo build/app/dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:8a:00.0,dv_flow_en=2 -a 0000:8a:00.1,dv_flow_en=2 -- -i --rxq=1 --txq=1



In the prompt, I typed below

flow configure 0 queues_number 1 queues_size 10 counters_number 0 aging_counters_number 0 meters_number 0 flags 0



but it said "Device with port_id=0 already started.".



I know rte_flow_configure() call should be in the middle of rte_eth_dev_configure() and rte_eth_dev_start().

So, I run testpmd by below to postpone device start,

sudo build/app/dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:8a:00.0,dv_flow_en=2 -a 0000:8a:00.1,dv_flow_en=2 -- -i --rxq=1 --txq=1 --disable-device-start



However, now not only rte_eth_dev_start() but also rte_eth_dev_configure() does not start, so it said "Device with port_id=0 is not configured.".



How can I run rte_flow_configure() between rte_eth_dev_configure() and rte_eth_dev_start() in testpmd?

Is there any parameter to postpone only rte_eth_dev_start()?



Sincerely,

Junghan Yoon.



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8667 bytes --]

RE: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

[Junghan Yoon]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 13364 bytes --]

RE: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

[Bing Zhao]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3211 bytes --]

What’s the FW version are you using?
If you are using OFED driver, it is suggested that you try the OFED >=5.8 with the FW inside.

BR. Bing

From: Junghan Yoon <cerotyki@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 9:50 PM
To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>; users@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

External email: Use caution opening links or attachments

Thank you Zhao.

I tried it, but now mlx5 driver returned error.
mlx5_net: [mlx5dr_action_create_generic]: Cannot create HWS action since HWS is not supported
It is what I saw in my original code before trying on testpmd.
It seems to be an issue from connectX-6 configuration.

Is there anyone ever tried to use asynchronous API with connectX-6?
Setting dv_flow_en=2 and dv_esw_en=1 seems not enough.
I explored the mlx5 code, and found that rte_flow_configure() queries HCA capability by mlx5dr_cmd_query_caps().
In my case, rte_flow_configure() returned error since caps->wqe_based_update is set by 0.

Is there anyone know how to set this value to non-zero?
I already wrote the same question on nvidia forum.

Sincerely,
Junghan Yoon

보낸 사람: Bing Zhao<mailto:bingz@nvidia.com>
보낸 날짜: 2023년 6월 9일 금요일 오후 10:00
받는 사람: users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>; cerotyki@gmail.com<mailto:cerotyki@gmail.com>
제목: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

Hi Junghan,

In testpmd, you can easily do it by:


port stop all

# or port stop 0



flow configure 0 ……

# if there are other port(s)

# flow configure Y ……





port start all

# or port start 0

With the source code implementation, you can configure it before starting a device.

BR. Bing


From: Junghan Yoon <cerotyki@gmail.com<mailto:cerotyki@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 10:57:13 AM
To: users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org> <users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>>
Subject: About rte_flow asynchronous API


Hi.

I’m trying to use testpmd to test rte_flow with asynchronous API in DPDK 22.11.



I turned on dv_esw_en=1 by echoing switchdev to /sys/class/net/…., and set dv_flow_en to 2 to use connectX-6 HWS (hardware steering).

sudo build/app/dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:8a:00.0,dv_flow_en=2 -a 0000:8a:00.1,dv_flow_en=2 -- -i --rxq=1 --txq=1



In the prompt, I typed below

flow configure 0 queues_number 1 queues_size 10 counters_number 0 aging_counters_number 0 meters_number 0 flags 0



but it said “Device with port_id=0 already started.”.



I know rte_flow_configure() call should be in the middle of rte_eth_dev_configure() and rte_eth_dev_start().

So, I run testpmd by below to postpone device start,

sudo build/app/dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:8a:00.0,dv_flow_en=2 -a 0000:8a:00.1,dv_flow_en=2 -- -i --rxq=1 --txq=1 --disable-device-start



However, now not only rte_eth_dev_start() but also rte_eth_dev_configure() does not start, so it said “Device with port_id=0 is not configured.”.



How can I run rte_flow_configure() between rte_eth_dev_configure() and rte_eth_dev_start() in testpmd?

Is there any parameter to postpone only rte_eth_dev_start()?



Sincerely,

Junghan Yoon.




[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 18842 bytes --]

RE: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

[Junghan Yoon]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 16502 bytes --]

RE: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

[Bing Zhao]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3987 bytes --]

FW seems to be a bit old. Please update to 22.34.1xxx to have a try.

From: Junghan Yoon <cerotyki@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 10:06 PM
To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>; users@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

External email: Use caution opening links or attachments

Thank you for your quick response.
Firmware version is 22.30.1004, and OFED version is OFED-5.8-1.1.2.

Sincerely,
Junghan Yoon
보낸 사람: Bing Zhao<mailto:bingz@nvidia.com>
보낸 날짜: 2023년 6월 9일 금요일 오후 10:56
받는 사람: Junghan Yoon<mailto:cerotyki@gmail.com>; users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>
제목: RE: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

What’s the FW version are you using?
If you are using OFED driver, it is suggested that you try the OFED >=5.8 with the FW inside.

BR. Bing

From: Junghan Yoon <cerotyki@gmail.com<mailto:cerotyki@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 9:50 PM
To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com<mailto:bingz@nvidia.com>>; users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

External email: Use caution opening links or attachments

Thank you Zhao.

I tried it, but now mlx5 driver returned error.
mlx5_net: [mlx5dr_action_create_generic]: Cannot create HWS action since HWS is not supported
It is what I saw in my original code before trying on testpmd.
It seems to be an issue from connectX-6 configuration.

Is there anyone ever tried to use asynchronous API with connectX-6?
Setting dv_flow_en=2 and dv_esw_en=1 seems not enough.
I explored the mlx5 code, and found that rte_flow_configure() queries HCA capability by mlx5dr_cmd_query_caps().
In my case, rte_flow_configure() returned error since caps->wqe_based_update is set by 0.

Is there anyone know how to set this value to non-zero?
I already wrote the same question on nvidia forum.

Sincerely,
Junghan Yoon

보낸 사람: Bing Zhao<mailto:bingz@nvidia.com>
보낸 날짜: 2023년 6월 9일 금요일 오후 10:00
받는 사람: users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>; cerotyki@gmail.com<mailto:cerotyki@gmail.com>
제목: RE: About rte_flow asynchronous API

Hi Junghan,

In testpmd, you can easily do it by:


port stop all

# or port stop 0



flow configure 0 ……

# if there are other port(s)

# flow configure Y ……





port start all

# or port start 0

With the source code implementation, you can configure it before starting a device.

BR. Bing


From: Junghan Yoon <cerotyki@gmail.com<mailto:cerotyki@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 10:57:13 AM
To: users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org> <users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>>
Subject: About rte_flow asynchronous API


Hi.

I’m trying to use testpmd to test rte_flow with asynchronous API in DPDK 22.11.



I turned on dv_esw_en=1 by echoing switchdev to /sys/class/net/…., and set dv_flow_en to 2 to use connectX-6 HWS (hardware steering).

sudo build/app/dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:8a:00.0,dv_flow_en=2 -a 0000:8a:00.1,dv_flow_en=2 -- -i --rxq=1 --txq=1



In the prompt, I typed below

flow configure 0 queues_number 1 queues_size 10 counters_number 0 aging_counters_number 0 meters_number 0 flags 0



but it said “Device with port_id=0 already started.”.



I know rte_flow_configure() call should be in the middle of rte_eth_dev_configure() and rte_eth_dev_start().

So, I run testpmd by below to postpone device start,

sudo build/app/dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:8a:00.0,dv_flow_en=2 -a 0000:8a:00.1,dv_flow_en=2 -- -i --rxq=1 --txq=1 --disable-device-start



However, now not only rte_eth_dev_start() but also rte_eth_dev_configure() does not start, so it said “Device with port_id=0 is not configured.”.



How can I run rte_flow_configure() between rte_eth_dev_configure() and rte_eth_dev_start() in testpmd?

Is there any parameter to postpone only rte_eth_dev_start()?



Sincerely,

Junghan Yoon.





[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 22807 bytes --]