[dpdk-web] [PATCH] doc/nics: list fail-safe driver

[dpdk-web] [PATCH] doc/nics: list fail-safe driver

[Gaetan Rivet]

Link the fail-safe PMD in the NICs guide.

Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
---
 doc/nics.html | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/doc/nics.html b/doc/nics.html
index 1328423..af3da79 100644
--- a/doc/nics.html
+++ b/doc/nics.html
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@
 				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/tap.html">tap</a> (kernel L2)</li>
 				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/pcap_ring.html#libpcap-based-pmd">pcap</a> (file or kernel driver)</li>
 				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/pcap_ring.html#rings-based-pmd">ring</a> (memory)</li>
+				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/fail_safe.html">fail-safe</a> (Seamless Hotplug Support)</li>
 			</ul>
 			<h3>Attic</h3>
 			<ul>
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] doc/nics: list fail-safe driver

[Thomas Monjalon]

03/08/2017 17:56, Gaetan Rivet:
> Link the fail-safe PMD in the NICs guide.

I think it was a request from Ferruh.

> +++ b/doc/nics.html

I don't think this page is the right place for this driver.
Similarly, the bonding PMD is not listed with supported NICs.

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] doc/nics: list fail-safe driver

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 8/3/2017 5:23 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 03/08/2017 17:56, Gaetan Rivet:
>> Link the fail-safe PMD in the NICs guide.
> 
> I think it was a request from Ferruh.

Yes it was from me.
Page title is "Supported NICs", taking this account it might not be
right place to advertise the failsafe.

Meanwhile there are other "others" section which lists some virtual
PMDs, failsafe can be listed as one of them.

> 
>> +++ b/doc/nics.html
> 
> I don't think this page is the right place for this driver.
> Similarly, the bonding PMD is not listed with supported NICs.
> 

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] doc/nics: list fail-safe driver

[Thomas Monjalon]

25/08/2017 14:12, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 8/3/2017 5:23 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 03/08/2017 17:56, Gaetan Rivet:
> >> Link the fail-safe PMD in the NICs guide.
> > 
> > I think it was a request from Ferruh.
> 
> Yes it was from me.
> Page title is "Supported NICs", taking this account it might not be
> right place to advertise the failsafe.
> 
> Meanwhile there are other "others" section which lists some virtual
> PMDs, failsafe can be listed as one of them.

Yes the virtual devices are listed in "others".
If we want to list failsafe, we should also add bonding.