From: Robert Sanford <rsanford2@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] port: fix full burst checks in f_tx_bulk ops
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:51:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459198297-49854-4-git-send-email-rsanford@akamai.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459198297-49854-1-git-send-email-rsanford@akamai.com>
For several f_tx_bulk functions in rte_port_{ethdev,ring,sched}.c,
it appears that the intent of the bsz_mask logic is to test whether
pkts_mask contains a full burst (i.e., the <tx_burst_sz> least
significant bits are set).
There are two problems with the bsz_mask code: 1) It truncates
by using the wrong size for local variable uint32_t bsz_mask, and
2) We may pass oversized bursts to the underlying ethdev/ring/sched,
e.g., tx_burst_sz=16, bsz_mask=0x8000, and pkts_mask=0x1ffff
(17 packets), results in expr==0, and we send a burst larger than
desired (and non-power-of-2) to the underlying tx burst interface.
We propose to effectively set bsz_mask = (1 << tx_burst_sz) - 1
(while avoiding truncation for tx_burst_sz=64), to cache the mask
value of a full burst, and then do a simple compare with pkts_mask
in each f_tx_bulk.
Signed-off-by: Robert Sanford <rsanford@akamai.com>
---
lib/librte_port/rte_port_ethdev.c | 15 ++++-----------
lib/librte_port/rte_port_ring.c | 16 ++++------------
lib/librte_port/rte_port_sched.c | 7 ++-----
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_ethdev.c
index 1c34602..3fb4947 100644
--- a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_ethdev.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ rte_port_ethdev_writer_create(void *params, int socket_id)
port->queue_id = conf->queue_id;
port->tx_burst_sz = conf->tx_burst_sz;
port->tx_buf_count = 0;
- port->bsz_mask = 1LLU << (conf->tx_burst_sz - 1);
+ port->bsz_mask = UINT64_MAX >> (64 - conf->tx_burst_sz);
return port;
}
@@ -229,12 +229,9 @@ rte_port_ethdev_writer_tx_bulk(void *port,
{
struct rte_port_ethdev_writer *p =
(struct rte_port_ethdev_writer *) port;
- uint32_t bsz_mask = p->bsz_mask;
uint32_t tx_buf_count = p->tx_buf_count;
- uint64_t expr = (pkts_mask & (pkts_mask + 1)) |
- ((pkts_mask & bsz_mask) ^ bsz_mask);
- if (expr == 0) {
+ if (pkts_mask == p->bsz_mask) {
uint64_t n_pkts = __builtin_popcountll(pkts_mask);
uint32_t n_pkts_ok;
@@ -369,7 +366,7 @@ rte_port_ethdev_writer_nodrop_create(void *params, int socket_id)
port->queue_id = conf->queue_id;
port->tx_burst_sz = conf->tx_burst_sz;
port->tx_buf_count = 0;
- port->bsz_mask = 1LLU << (conf->tx_burst_sz - 1);
+ port->bsz_mask = UINT64_MAX >> (64 - conf->tx_burst_sz);
/*
* When n_retries is 0 it means that we should wait for every packet to
@@ -435,13 +432,9 @@ rte_port_ethdev_writer_nodrop_tx_bulk(void *port,
{
struct rte_port_ethdev_writer_nodrop *p =
(struct rte_port_ethdev_writer_nodrop *) port;
-
- uint32_t bsz_mask = p->bsz_mask;
uint32_t tx_buf_count = p->tx_buf_count;
- uint64_t expr = (pkts_mask & (pkts_mask + 1)) |
- ((pkts_mask & bsz_mask) ^ bsz_mask);
- if (expr == 0) {
+ if (pkts_mask == p->bsz_mask) {
uint64_t n_pkts = __builtin_popcountll(pkts_mask);
uint32_t n_pkts_ok;
diff --git a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_ring.c b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_ring.c
index 765ecc5..b36e4ce 100644
--- a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_ring.c
+++ b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_ring.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ rte_port_ring_writer_create_internal(void *params, int socket_id,
port->ring = conf->ring;
port->tx_burst_sz = conf->tx_burst_sz;
port->tx_buf_count = 0;
- port->bsz_mask = 1LLU << (conf->tx_burst_sz - 1);
+ port->bsz_mask = UINT64_MAX >> (64 - conf->tx_burst_sz);
port->is_multi = is_multi;
return port;
@@ -299,13 +299,9 @@ rte_port_ring_writer_tx_bulk_internal(void *port,
{
struct rte_port_ring_writer *p =
(struct rte_port_ring_writer *) port;
-
- uint32_t bsz_mask = p->bsz_mask;
uint32_t tx_buf_count = p->tx_buf_count;
- uint64_t expr = (pkts_mask & (pkts_mask + 1)) |
- ((pkts_mask & bsz_mask) ^ bsz_mask);
- if (expr == 0) {
+ if (pkts_mask == p->bsz_mask) {
uint64_t n_pkts = __builtin_popcountll(pkts_mask);
uint32_t n_pkts_ok;
@@ -486,7 +482,7 @@ rte_port_ring_writer_nodrop_create_internal(void *params, int socket_id,
port->ring = conf->ring;
port->tx_burst_sz = conf->tx_burst_sz;
port->tx_buf_count = 0;
- port->bsz_mask = 1LLU << (conf->tx_burst_sz - 1);
+ port->bsz_mask = UINT64_MAX >> (64 - conf->tx_burst_sz);
port->is_multi = is_multi;
/*
@@ -613,13 +609,9 @@ rte_port_ring_writer_nodrop_tx_bulk_internal(void *port,
{
struct rte_port_ring_writer_nodrop *p =
(struct rte_port_ring_writer_nodrop *) port;
-
- uint32_t bsz_mask = p->bsz_mask;
uint32_t tx_buf_count = p->tx_buf_count;
- uint64_t expr = (pkts_mask & (pkts_mask + 1)) |
- ((pkts_mask & bsz_mask) ^ bsz_mask);
- if (expr == 0) {
+ if (pkts_mask == p->bsz_mask) {
uint64_t n_pkts = __builtin_popcountll(pkts_mask);
uint32_t n_pkts_ok;
diff --git a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_sched.c b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_sched.c
index c5ff8ab..5b6afc4 100644
--- a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_sched.c
+++ b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_sched.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ rte_port_sched_writer_create(void *params, int socket_id)
port->sched = conf->sched;
port->tx_burst_sz = conf->tx_burst_sz;
port->tx_buf_count = 0;
- port->bsz_mask = 1LLU << (conf->tx_burst_sz - 1);
+ port->bsz_mask = UINT64_MAX >> (64 - conf->tx_burst_sz);
return port;
}
@@ -214,12 +214,9 @@ rte_port_sched_writer_tx_bulk(void *port,
uint64_t pkts_mask)
{
struct rte_port_sched_writer *p = (struct rte_port_sched_writer *) port;
- uint32_t bsz_mask = p->bsz_mask;
uint32_t tx_buf_count = p->tx_buf_count;
- uint64_t expr = (pkts_mask & (pkts_mask + 1)) |
- ((pkts_mask & bsz_mask) ^ bsz_mask);
- if (expr == 0) {
+ if (pkts_mask == p->bsz_mask) {
__rte_unused uint32_t nb_tx;
uint64_t n_pkts = __builtin_popcountll(pkts_mask);
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-28 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-28 20:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] port: fix and test bugs in tx_bulk ops Robert Sanford
2016-03-28 20:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] app/test: enhance test_port_ring_writer Robert Sanford
2016-04-01 19:42 ` Sanford, Robert
2016-04-06 16:46 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-03-28 20:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] port: fix ring writer buffer overflow Robert Sanford
2016-03-31 11:21 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-03-28 20:51 ` Robert Sanford [this message]
2016-03-31 15:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] port: fix full burst checks in f_tx_bulk ops Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-04-01 19:31 ` Sanford, Robert
2016-03-28 20:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] port: fix ethdev writer burst too big Robert Sanford
2016-03-31 13:22 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-03-30 11:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] port: fix and test bugs in tx_bulk ops Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-30 11:58 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459198297-49854-4-git-send-email-rsanford@akamai.com \
--to=rsanford2@gmail.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).