From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
Cc: Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/mlx5: adjust removal error
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 14:06:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103130605.GO24849@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1509637324-13525-4-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 03:42:04PM +0000, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Fail-safe PMD expects to get -ENODEV error value if sub PMD control
> command fails because of device removal.
>
> Make control callbacks return with -ENODEV when the device has
> disappeared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
In short I have the same comments as on the mlx4 patch about usage
consistency, this also applies to mlx5; mlx5_removed() should be only used
by the public callbacks from struct eth_dev_ops.
There's an additional difficulty with this PMD, you need to take into
account the fact it provides secondary process support (mlx5_dev_sec_ops).
I think secondary processes do not have any IBV context available for
mlx5_removed() to query, which should resolve to a no-op in this case.
Make sure secondary processes do not crash whatever happens.
See below for coding style and other issues.
> ---
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c | 2 ++
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rss.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c | 6 +++++-
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c | 2 ++
> 7 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h
> index e6a69b8..0dd104a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h
> @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ int mlx5_ibv_device_to_pci_addr(const struct ibv_device *,
> int mlx5_set_link_up(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> void priv_dev_select_tx_function(struct priv *priv, struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> void priv_dev_select_rx_function(struct priv *priv, struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> +int mlx5_removed(const struct priv *priv);
>
> /* mlx5_mac.c */
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c
> index c31ea4b..bf61cd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c
> @@ -394,6 +394,8 @@ struct priv *
>
> ret = priv_sysfs_write(priv, name, value_str, (sizeof(value_str) - 1));
> if (ret == -1) {
> + if (mlx5_removed(priv))
> + errno = ENODEV;
> DEBUG("cannot write %s `%s' (%lu) to sysfs: %s",
> name, value_str, value, strerror(errno));
> return -1;
> @@ -925,13 +927,17 @@ struct priv *
> {
> struct utsname utsname;
> int ver[3];
> + int ret;
>
> if (uname(&utsname) == -1 ||
> sscanf(utsname.release, "%d.%d.%d",
> &ver[0], &ver[1], &ver[2]) != 3 ||
> KERNEL_VERSION(ver[0], ver[1], ver[2]) < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 9, 0))
> - return mlx5_link_update_unlocked_gset(dev, wait_to_complete);
> - return mlx5_link_update_unlocked_gs(dev, wait_to_complete);
> + ret = mlx5_link_update_unlocked_gset(dev, wait_to_complete);
> + ret = mlx5_link_update_unlocked_gs(dev, wait_to_complete);
Besides the extra space after "ret =", I think this doesn't work as
intended. A "else" statement is necessary.
> + if (ret && mlx5_removed(mlx5_get_priv(dev)))
> + return -ENODEV;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -978,6 +984,8 @@ struct priv *
> strerror(ret));
> priv_unlock(priv);
> assert(ret >= 0);
> + if (mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> return -ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1029,6 +1037,8 @@ struct priv *
> out:
> priv_unlock(priv);
> assert(ret >= 0);
> + if (mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> return -ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1083,6 +1093,8 @@ struct priv *
> out:
> priv_unlock(priv);
> assert(ret >= 0);
> + if (mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> return -ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1364,13 +1376,13 @@ struct priv *
> if (up) {
> err = priv_set_flags(priv, ~IFF_UP, IFF_UP);
> if (err)
> - return err;
> + return errno == ENODEV ? -ENODEV : err;
There is a documentation issue here since the mlx5 PMD didn't get all the
errno consistency fixes that mlx4 got, however err is documented as being -1
in case of error, whereas priv_dev_set_link() returns a positive errno value
instead and mlx5_set_link_down/up() should return only negative errno values
but are documented as returning positive ones.
Anyway to keep it short: currently in mlx5, priv_*() => positive errno and
the public-facing mlx5_*() => negative errno, hence you should return a
positive ENODEV here.
You could avoid this mess by patching the public callbacks only and not
internal functions like this one.
> priv_dev_select_tx_function(priv, dev);
> priv_dev_select_rx_function(priv, dev);
> } else {
> err = priv_set_flags(priv, ~IFF_UP, ~IFF_UP);
> if (err)
> - return err;
> + return errno == ENODEV ? -ENODEV : err;
Same here.
> dev->rx_pkt_burst = removed_rx_burst;
> dev->tx_pkt_burst = removed_tx_burst;
> }
> @@ -1474,3 +1486,22 @@ struct priv *
> dev->rx_pkt_burst = mlx5_rx_burst;
> }
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * Check if mlx5 device was removed.
> + *
"mlx5" is redundant.
As with mlx4, a short paragraph should describe where this function is
supposed to be used.
> + * @param priv
> + * Pointer to private structure.
> + *
> + * @return
> + * -ENODEV when device is removed and rte_errno is set, otherwise 0.
> + */
> +int
> +mlx5_removed(const struct priv *priv)
> +{
> + struct ibv_device_attr device_attr;
> +
> + if (ibv_query_device(priv->ctx, &device_attr) == EIO)
> + return -(rte_errno = ENODEV);
Coding rules prohibit this kind of affectation, see mlx4 comments.
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
> index 5f49bf5..448c0a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
> @@ -3068,6 +3068,8 @@ struct rte_flow *
> priv_lock(priv);
> ret = priv_fdir_ctrl_func(priv, filter_op, arg);
> priv_unlock(priv);
> + if (ret && mlx5_removed(priv))
> + ret = ENODEV;
> break;
> default:
> ERROR("%p: filter type (%d) not supported",
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rss.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rss.c
> index f3de46d..1ad9269 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rss.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rss.c
> @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@
> priv_lock(priv);
> ret = priv_dev_rss_reta_query(priv, reta_conf, reta_size);
> priv_unlock(priv);
> + if (ret && mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> return -ret;
> }
>
> @@ -282,5 +284,7 @@
> mlx5_dev_stop(dev);
> mlx5_dev_start(dev);
> }
> + if (ret && mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> return -ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
> index a1f382b..c9a549d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
> @@ -278,6 +278,8 @@
> (*priv->rxqs)[idx] = &rxq_ctrl->rxq;
> out:
> priv_unlock(priv);
> + if (mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> return -ret;
> }
>
> @@ -485,8 +487,11 @@
> }
> exit:
> priv_unlock(priv);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> WARN("unable to arm interrupt on rx queue %d", rx_queue_id);
> + if (mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> return -ret;
> }
>
> @@ -537,9 +542,12 @@
> if (rxq_ibv)
> mlx5_priv_rxq_ibv_release(priv, rxq_ibv);
> priv_unlock(priv);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> WARN("unable to disable interrupt on rx queue %d",
> rx_queue_id);
> + if (mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> return -ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c
> index 5e225d3..33b2a60 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_stats.c
> @@ -438,13 +438,17 @@ struct mlx5_counter_ctrl {
> stats_n = priv_ethtool_get_stats_n(priv);
> if (stats_n < 0) {
> priv_unlock(priv);
> - return -1;
> + ret = -1;
> + goto error;
> }
> if (xstats_ctrl->stats_n != stats_n)
> priv_xstats_init(priv);
> ret = priv_xstats_get(priv, stats);
> priv_unlock(priv);
> }
> +error:
> + if (ret < 0 && mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c
> index fbb2630..a0101cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,8 @@
> (*priv->txqs)[idx] = &txq_ctrl->txq;
> out:
> priv_unlock(priv);
> + if (mlx5_removed(priv))
> + return -ENODEV;
> return -ret;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-03 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-02 15:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Fail-safe fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/failsafe: " Matan Azrad
2017-11-06 8:19 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-11-02 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/mlx4: adjust removal error Matan Azrad
2017-11-03 13:05 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-05 6:52 ` Matan Azrad
2017-11-06 16:51 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-02 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2017-11-03 13:06 ` Adrien Mazarguil [this message]
2017-11-05 6:57 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fail-safe fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 15:16 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-13 15:48 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 16:09 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-13 17:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-14 10:40 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 21:55 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-14 10:40 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-14 10:48 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-14 13:07 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-14 13:27 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-14 14:43 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-19 17:24 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 20:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19 22:13 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-20 8:39 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-07 9:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-07 9:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Matan Azrad
2018-01-07 9:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 22:21 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-20 10:58 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-08 10:57 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-08 12:55 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-08 13:46 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-08 14:00 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-08 14:31 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-10 12:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:43 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 13:51 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-10 13:47 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 8:44 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 17:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-18 17:57 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-18 18:02 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 16:59 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 16:59 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 17:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-18 18:10 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-19 16:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-19 17:35 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-01-19 17:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-19 18:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-19 18:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-20 19:04 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 20:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-20 20:45 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-21 20:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2018-01-21 20:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171103130605.GO24849@6wind.com \
--to=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).